Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Amedeo Roberto Esposito

Publications and source records attributed to Amedeo Roberto Esposito.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

From Generalisation Error to Transportation-cost Inequalities and Back

In this work, we connect the problem of bounding the expected generalisation error with transportation-cost inequalities. Exposing the underlying pattern behind both approaches we are able to generalise them and go beyond Kullback-Leibler Divergences/Mutual Information and sub-Gaussian measures. In particular, we are able to provide a result showing the equivalence between two families of inequalities: one involving functionals and one involving measures. This result generalises the one proposed by Bobkov and Götze that connects transportation-cost inequalities with concentration of measure. Moreover, it allows us to recover all standard generalisation error bounds involving mutual information and to introduce new, more general bounds, that involve arbitrary divergence measures.

cs.IT↗

On Sibson's $α$-Mutual Information

We explore a family of information measures that stems from Rényi's $α$-Divergences with $α<0$. In particular, we extend the definition of Sibson's $α$-Mutual Information to negative values of $α$ and show several properties of these objects. Moreover, we highlight how this family of information measures is related to functional inequalities that can be employed in a variety of fields, including lower-bounds on the Risk in Bayesian Estimation Procedures.

cs.IT↗

On conditional Sibson's $α$-Mutual Information

In this work, we analyse how to define a conditional version of Sibson's $α$-Mutual Information. Several such definitions can be advanced and they all lead to different information measures with different (but similar) operational meanings. We will analyse in detail one such definition, compute a closed-form expression for it and endorse it with an operational meaning while also considering some applications. The alternative definitions will also be mentioned and compared.

cs.IT↗

Generalization Error Bounds Via Rényi-, $f$-Divergences and Maximal Leakage

In this work, the probability of an event under some joint distribution is bounded by measuring it with the product of the marginals instead (which is typically easier to analyze) together with a measure of the dependence between the two random variables. These results find applications in adaptive data analysis, where multiple dependencies are introduced and in learning theory, where they can be employed to bound the generalization error of a learning algorithm. Bounds are given in terms of Sibson's Mutual Information, $α-$Divergences, Hellinger Divergences, and $f-$Divergences. A case of particular interest is the Maximal Leakage (or Sibson's Mutual Information of order infinity), since this measure is robust to post-processing and composes adaptively. The corresponding bound can be seen as a generalization of classical bounds, such as Hoeffding's and McDiarmid's inequalities, to the case of dependent random variables.

cs.IT↗

Robust Generalization via $α$-Mutual Information

The aim of this work is to provide bounds connecting two probability measures of the same event using Rényi $α$-Divergences and Sibson's $α$-Mutual Information, a generalization of respectively the Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Shannon's Mutual Information. A particular case of interest can be found when the two probability measures considered are a joint distribution and the corresponding product of marginals (representing the statistically independent scenario). In this case, a bound using Sibson's $α-$Mutual Information is retrieved, extending a result involving Maximal Leakage to general alphabets. These results have broad applications, from bounding the generalization error of learning algorithms to the more general framework of adaptive data analysis, provided that the divergences and/or information measures used are amenable to such an analysis ({\it i.e.,} are robust to post-processing and compose adaptively). The generalization error bounds are derived with respect to high-probability events but a corresponding bound on expected generalization error is also retrieved.

cs.IT↗

Strengthened Information-theoretic Bounds on the Generalization Error

The following problem is considered: given a joint distribution $P_{XY}$ and an event $E$, bound $P_{XY}(E)$ in terms of $P_XP_Y(E)$ (where $P_XP_Y$ is the product of the marginals of $P_{XY}$) and a measure of dependence of $X$ and $Y$. Such bounds have direct applications in the analysis of the generalization error of learning algorithms, where $E$ represents a large error event and the measure of dependence controls the degree of overfitting. Herein, bounds are demonstrated using several information-theoretic metrics, in particular: mutual information, lautum information, maximal leakage, and $J_\infty$. The mutual information bound can outperform comparable bounds in the literature by an arbitrarily large factor.

cs.IT↗

A New Approach to Adaptive Data Analysis and Learning via Maximal Leakage

There is an increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The main cause seems to lie in the fundamental disconnection between theory and practice in data analysis. While the former typically relies on statistical independence, the latter is an inherently adaptive process: new hypotheses are formulated based on the outcomes of previous analyses. A recent line of work tries to mitigate these issues by enforcing constraints, such as differential privacy, that compose adaptively while degrading gracefully and thus provide statistical guarantees even in adaptive contexts. Our contribution consists in the introduction of a new approach, based on the concept of Maximal Leakage, an information-theoretic measure of leakage of information. The main result allows us to compare the probability of an event happening when adaptivity is considered with respect to the non-adaptive scenario. The bound we derive represents a generalization of the bounds used in non-adaptive scenarios (e.g., McDiarmid's inequality for $c$-sensitive functions, false discovery error control via significance level, etc.), and allows us to replicate or even improve, in certain regimes, the results obtained using Max-Information or Differential Privacy. In contrast with the line of work started by Dwork et al., our results do not rely on Differential Privacy but are, in principle, applicable to every algorithm that has a bounded leakage, including the differentially private algorithms and the ones with a short description length.

stat.ML↗