arXiv subjects

Amir Abboud

Publications and source records attributed to Amir Abboud.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Equivalent Dichotomies for Triangle Detection in Subgraph, Induced, and Colored H-Free Graphs

A recent paper by the authors (ITCS'26) initiates the study of the Triangle Detection problem in graphs avoiding a fixed pattern H as a subgraph and proposes a dichotomy hypothesis characterizing which patterns H make the Triangle Detection problem easier in H-free graphs than in general graphs. In this work, we demonstrate that this hypothesis is, in fact, equivalent to analogous hypotheses in two broader settings that a priori seem significantly more challenging: induced H-free graphs and colored H-free graphs. Our main contribution is a reduction from the induced H-free case to the non-induced H'-free case, where H' preserves the structural properties of H that are relevant for the dichotomy, namely 3-colorability and triangle count. A similar reduction is given for the colored case. A key technical ingredient is a self-reduction to Unique Triangle Detection that preserves the induced H-freeness property, via a new color-coding-like reduction.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Triangle Detection in H-Free Graphs

We initiate the study of combinatorial algorithms for Triangle Detection in $H$-free graphs. The goal is to decide if a graph that forbids a fixed pattern $H$ as a subgraph contains a triangle, using only "combinatorial" methods that notably exclude fast matrix multiplication. Our work aims to classify which patterns admit a subcubic speedup, working towards a dichotomy theorem. On the lower bound side, we show that if $H$ is not $3$-colorable or contains more than one triangle, the complexity of the problem remains unchanged, and no combinatorial speedup is likely possible. On the upper bound side, we develop an embedding approach that results in a strongly subcubic, combinatorial algorithm for a rich class of "embeddable" patterns. Specifically, for an embeddable pattern of size $k$, our algorithm runs in $\tilde O(n^{3-\frac{1}{2^{k-3}}})$ time, where $\tilde O(\cdot)$ hides poly-logarithmic factors. This algorithm also extends to listing all the triangles within the same time bound. We supplement this main result with two generalizations: 1) A generalization to patterns that are embeddable up to a single obstacle that arises from a triangle in the pattern. This completes our classification for small patterns, yielding a dichotomy theorem for all patterns of size up to eight. 2) An $H$-sensitive algorithm for embeddable patterns, which runs faster when the number of copies of $H$ is significantly smaller than the maximum possible $\Omega(n^k)$. Finally, we focus on the special case of odd cycles. We present specialized Triangle Detection algorithms that are very efficient: 1) A combinatorial algorithm for $C_{2k+1}$-free graphs that runs in $\tilde O(m+n^{1+2/k})$ time for every $k\geq2$, where $m$ is the number of edges in the graph. 2) A combinatorial $C_5$-sensitive algorithm that runs in $\tilde O(n^2+n^{4/3}t^{1/3})$ time, where $t$ is the number of $5$-cycles in the graph.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Deterministic Almost-Linear-Time Gomory-Hu Trees

Given an $m$-edge, undirected, weighted graph $G=(V,E,w)$, a Gomory-Hu tree $T$ (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a tree over the vertex set $V$ such that all-pairs mincuts in $G$ are preserved exactly in $T$. In this article, we give the first almost-optimal $m^{1+o(1)}$-time deterministic algorithm for constructing a Gomory-Hu tree. Prior to our work, the best deterministic algorithm for this problem dated back to the original algorithm of Gomory and Hu that runs in $nm^{1+o(1)}$ time (using current maxflow algorithms). In fact, this is the first almost-linear time deterministic algorithm for even simpler problems, such as finding the $k$-edge-connected components of a graph. Our new result hinges on two separate and novel components that each introduce a distinct set of de-randomization tools of independent interest: - a deterministic reduction from the all-pairs mincuts problem to the single-souce mincuts problem incurring only subpolynomial overhead, and - a deterministic almost-linear time algorithm for the single-source mincuts problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

A Truly Subcubic Combinatorial Algorithm for Induced 4-Cycle Detection

We present the first truly subcubic, combinatorial algorithm for detecting an induced $4$-cycle in a graph. The running time is $O(n^{2.84})$ on $n$-node graphs, thus separating the task of detecting induced $4$-cycles from detecting triangles, which requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time combinatorially under the popular BMM hypothesis. Significant work has gone into characterizing the exact time complexity of induced $H$-detection, relative to the complexity of detecting cliques of various sizes. Prior work identified the question of whether induced $4$-cycle detection is triangle-hard as the only remaining case towards completing the lowest level of the classification, dubbing it a "curious" case [Dalirrooyfard, Vassilevska W., FOCS 2022]. Our result can be seen as a negative resolution of this question. Our algorithm deviates from previous techniques in the large body of subgraph detection algorithms and employs the trendy topic of graph decomposition that has hitherto been restricted to more global problems (as in the use of expander decompositions for flow problems) or to shaving subpolynomial factors (as in the application of graph regularity lemmas). While our algorithm is slower than the (non-combinatorial) state-of-the-art $\tilde{O}(n^{\omega})$-time algorithm based on polynomial identity testing [Vassilevska W., Wang, Williams, Yu, SODA 2014], combinatorial advancements often come with other benefits. In particular, we give the first nontrivial deterministic algorithm for detecting induced $4$-cycles.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

All-Pairs Shortest Paths with Few Weights per Node

We study the central All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem under the restriction that there are at most $d$ distinct weights on the outgoing edges from every node. For $d=n$ this is the classical (unrestricted) APSP problem that is hypothesized to require cubic time $n^{3-o(1)}$, and at the other extreme, for $d=1$, it is equivalent to the Node-Weighted APSP problem. We present new algorithms that achieve the following results: 1. Node-Weighted APSP can be solved in time $\tilde{O}(n^{(3+\omega)/2}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.686})$, improving on the 15-year-old subcubic bounds $\tilde{O}(n^{(9+\omega)/4}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.843})$ [Chan; STOC '07] and $\tilde{O}(n^{2.830})$ [Yuster; SODA '09]. This positively resolves the question of whether Node-Weighted APSP is an ``intermediate'' problem in the sense of having complexity $n^{2.5+o(1)}$ if $\omega=2$, in which case it also matches an $n^{2.5-o(1)}$ conditional lower bound. 2. For up to $d \leq n^{3-\omega-\epsilon}$ distinct weights per node (where $\epsilon > 0$), the problem can be solved in subcubic time $O(n^{3-f(\epsilon)})$ (where $f(\epsilon) > 0$). In particular, assuming that $\omega = 2$, we can tolerate any sublinear number of distinct weights per node $d \leq n^{1-\epsilon}$, whereas previous work [Yuster; SODA '09] could only handle $d \leq n^{1/2-\epsilon}$ in subcubic time. This promotes our understanding of the APSP hypothesis showing that the hardest instances must exhaust a linear number of weights per node. Our result also applies to the All-Pairs Exact Triangle problem, thus generalizing a result of Chan and Lewenstein on "Clustered 3SUM" from arrays to matrices. Notably, our technique constitutes a rare application of additive combinatorics in graph algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

On Beating $2^n$ for the Closest Vector Problem

The Closest Vector Problem (CVP) is a computational problem in lattices that is central to modern cryptography. The study of its fine-grained complexity has gained momentum in the last few years, partly due to the upcoming deployment of lattice-based cryptosystems in practice. A main motivating question has been if there is a $(2-\varepsilon)^n$ time algorithm on lattices of rank $n$, or whether it can be ruled out by SETH. Previous work came tantalizingly close to a negative answer by showing a $2^{(1-o(1))n}$ lower bound under SETH if the underlying distance metric is changed from the standard $\ell_2$ norm to other $\ell_p$ norms. Moreover, barriers toward proving such results for $\ell_2$ (and any even $p$) were established. In this paper we show \emph{positive results} for a natural special case of the problem that has hitherto seemed just as hard, namely $(0,1)$-$\mathsf{CVP}$ where the lattice vectors are restricted to be sums of subsets of basis vectors (meaning that all coefficients are $0$ or $1$). All previous hardness results applied to this problem, and none of the previous algorithmic techniques could benefit from it. We prove the following results, which follow from new reductions from $(0,1)$-$\mathsf{CVP}$ to weighted Max-SAT and minimum-weight $k$-Clique. 1. An $O(1.7299^n)$ time algorithm for exact $(0,1)$-$\mathsf{CVP}_2$ in Euclidean norm, breaking the natural $2^n$ barrier, as long as the absolute value of all coordinates in the input vectors is $2^{o(n)}$. 2. A computational equivalence between $(0,1)$-$\mathsf{CVP}_p$ and Max-$p$-SAT for all even $p$. 3. The minimum-weight-$k$-Clique conjecture from fine-grained complexity and its numerous consequences (which include the APSP conjecture) can now be supported by the hardness of a lattice problem, namely $(0,1)$-$\mathsf{CVP}_2$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Recognizing Sumsets is NP-Complete

Sumsets are central objects in additive combinatorics. In 2007, Granville asked whether one can efficiently recognize whether a given set $S$ is a sumset, i.e. whether there is a set $A$ such that $A+A=S$. Granville suggested an algorithm that takes exponential time in the size of the given set, but can we do polynomial or even linear time? This basic computational question is indirectly asking a fundamental structural question: do the special characteristics of sumsets allow them to be efficiently recognizable? In this paper, we answer this question negatively by proving that the problem is NP-complete. Specifically, our results hold for integer sets and over any finite field. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, our lower bound becomes $2^{\Omega(n^{1/4})}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

From Donkeys to Kings in Tournaments

A tournament is an orientation of a complete graph. A vertex that can reach every other vertex within two steps is called a \emph{king}. We study the complexity of finding $k$ kings in a tournament graph. We show that the randomized query complexity of finding $k \le 3$ kings is $O(n)$, and for the deterministic case it takes the same amount of queries (up to a constant) as finding a single king (the best known deterministic algorithm makes $O(n^{3/2})$ queries). On the other hand, we show that finding $k \ge 4$ kings requires $\Omega(n^2)$ queries, even in the randomized case. We consider the RAM model for $k \geq 4$. We show an algorithm that finds $k$ kings in time $O(kn^2)$, which is optimal for constant values of $k$. Alternatively, one can also find $k \ge 4$ kings in time $n^{\omega}$ (the time for matrix multiplication). We provide evidence that this is optimal for large $k$ by suggesting a fine-grained reduction from a variant of the triangle detection problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Faster Combinatorial k-Clique Algorithms

Detecting if a graph contains a $k$-Clique is one of the most fundamental problems in computer science. The asymptotically fastest algorithm runs in time $O(n^{ωk/3})$, where $ω$ is the exponent of Boolean matrix multiplication. To date, this is the only technique capable of beating the trivial $O(n^k)$ bound by a polynomial factor. Due to this technique's various limitations, much effort has gone into designing "combinatorial" algorithms that improve over exhaustive search via other techniques. The first contribution of this work is a faster combinatorial algorithm for $k$-Clique, improving Vassilevska's bound of $O(n^{k}/\log^{k-1}{n})$ by two log factors. Technically, our main result is a new reduction from $k$-Clique to Triangle detection that exploits the same divide-and-conquer at the core of recent combinatorial algorithms by Chan (SODA'15) and Yu (ICALP'15). Our second contribution is exploiting combinatorial techniques to improve the state-of-the-art (even of non-combinatorial algorithms) for generalizations of the $k$-Clique problem. In particular, we give the first $o(n^k)$ algorithm for $k$-clique in hypergraphs and an $O(n^3/\log^{2.25}{n} + t)$ algorithm for listing $t$ triangles in a graph.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Worst-Case to Expander-Case Reductions: Derandomized and Generalized

A recent paper by Abboud and Wallheimer [ITCS 2023] presents self-reductions for various fundamental graph problems, which transform worst-case instances to expanders, thus proving that the complexity remains unchanged if the input is assumed to be an expander. An interesting corollary of their self-reductions is that if some problem admits such reduction, then the popular algorithmic paradigm based on expander-decompositions is useless against it. In this paper, we improve their core gadget, which augments a graph to make it an expander while retaining its important structure. Our new core construction has the benefit of being simple to analyze and generalize while obtaining the following results: 1. A derandomization of the self-reductions, showing that the equivalence between worst-case and expander-case holds even for deterministic algorithms, and ruling out the use of expander-decompositions as a derandomization tool. 2. An extension of the results to other models of computation, such as the Fully Dynamic model and the Congested Clique model. In the former, we either improve or provide an alternative approach to some recent hardness results for dynamic expander graphs by Henzinger, Paz, and Sricharan [ESA 2022]. In addition, we continue this line of research by designing new self-reductions for more problems, such as Max-Cut and dynamic Densest Subgraph, and demonstrating that the core gadget can be utilized to lift lower bounds based on the OMv Conjecture to expanders.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

New Graph Decompositions and Combinatorial Boolean Matrix Multiplication Algorithms

We revisit the fundamental Boolean Matrix Multiplication (BMM) problem. With the invention of algebraic fast matrix multiplication over 50 years ago, it also became known that BMM can be solved in truly subcubic $O(n^ω)$ time, where $ω<3$; much work has gone into bringing $ω$ closer to $2$. Since then, a parallel line of work has sought comparably fast combinatorial algorithms but with limited success. The naive $O(n^3)$-time algorithm was initially improved by a $\log^2{n}$ factor [Arlazarov et al.; RAS'70], then by $\log^{2.25}{n}$ [Bansal and Williams; FOCS'09], then by $\log^3{n}$ [Chan; SODA'15], and finally by $\log^4{n}$ [Yu; ICALP'15]. We design a combinatorial algorithm for BMM running in time $n^3 / 2^{Ω(\sqrt[7]{\log n})}$ -- a speed-up over cubic time that is stronger than any poly-log factor. This comes tantalizingly close to refuting the conjecture from the 90s that truly subcubic combinatorial algorithms for BMM are impossible. This popular conjecture is the basis for dozens of fine-grained hardness results. Our main technical contribution is a new regularity decomposition theorem for Boolean matrices (or equivalently, bipartite graphs) under a notion of regularity that was recently introduced and analyzed analytically in the context of communication complexity [Kelley, Lovett, Meka; arXiv'23], and is related to a similar notion from the recent work on $3$-term arithmetic progression free sets [Kelley, Meka; FOCS'23].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Reachability Preservers: New Extremal Bounds and Approximation Algorithms

We abstract and study \emph{reachability preservers}, a graph-theoretic primitive that has been implicit in prior work on network design. Given a directed graph $G = (V, E)$ and a set of \emph{demand pairs} $P \subseteq V \times V$, a reachability preserver is a sparse subgraph $H$ that preserves reachability between all demand pairs. Our first contribution is a series of extremal bounds on the size of reachability preservers. Our main result states that, for an $n$-node graph and demand pairs of the form $P \subseteq S \times V$ for a small node subset $S$, there is always a reachability preserver on $O(n+\sqrt{n |P| |S|})$ edges. We additionally give a lower bound construction demonstrating that this upper bound characterizes the settings in which $O(n)$ size reachability preservers are generally possible, in a large range of parameters. The second contribution of this paper is a new connection between extremal graph sparsification results and classical Steiner Network Design problems. Surprisingly, prior to this work, the osmosis of techniques between these two fields had been superficial. This allows us to improve the state of the art approximation algorithms for the most basic Steiner-type problem in directed graphs from the $O(n^{0.6+\varepsilon})$ of Chlamatac, Dinitz, Kortsarz, and Laekhanukit (SODA'17) to $O(n^{4/7+\varepsilon})$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Stronger 3-SUM Lower Bounds for Approximate Distance Oracles via Additive Combinatorics

The "short cycle removal" technique was recently introduced by Abboud, Bringmann, Khoury and Zamir (STOC '22) to prove fine-grained hardness of approximation. Its main technical result is that listing all triangles in an $n^{1/2}$-regular graph is $n^{2-o(1)}$-hard under the 3-SUM conjecture even when the number of short cycles is small; namely, when the number of $k$-cycles is $O(n^{k/2+γ})$ for $γ<1/2$. Abboud et al. achieve $γ\geq 1/4$ by applying structure vs. randomness arguments on graphs. In this paper, we take a step back and apply conceptually similar arguments on the numbers of the 3-SUM problem. Consequently, we achieve the best possible $γ=0$ and the following lower bounds under the 3-SUM conjecture: * Approximate distance oracles: The seminal Thorup-Zwick distance oracles achieve stretch $2k\pm O(1)$ after preprocessing a graph in $O(m n^{1/k})$ time. For the same stretch, and assuming the query time is $n^{o(1)}$ Abboud et al. proved an $Ω(m^{1+\frac{1}{12.7552 \cdot k}})$ lower bound on the preprocessing time; we improve it to $Ω(m^{1+\frac1{2k}})$ which is only a factor 2 away from the upper bound. We also obtain tight bounds for stretch $2+o(1)$ and $3-ε$ and higher lower bounds for dynamic shortest paths. * Listing 4-cycles: Abboud et al. proved the first super-linear lower bound for listing all 4-cycles in a graph, ruling out $(m^{1.1927}+t)^{1+o(1)}$ time algorithms where $t$ is the number of 4-cycles. We settle the complexity of this basic problem by showing that the $\widetilde{O}(\min(m^{4/3},n^2) +t)$ upper bound is tight up to $n^{o(1)}$ factors. Our results exploit a rich tool set from additive combinatorics, most notably the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem and Rusza's covering lemma. A key ingredient that may be of independent interest is a subquadratic algorithm for 3-SUM if one of the sets has small doubling.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

The Time Complexity of Fully Sparse Matrix Multiplication

What is the time complexity of matrix multiplication of sparse integer matrices with $m_{in}$ nonzeros in the input and $m_{out}$ nonzeros in the output? This paper provides improved upper bounds for this question for almost any choice of $m_{in}$ vs. $m_{out}$, and provides evidence that these new bounds might be optimal up to further progress on fast matrix multiplication. Our main contribution is a new algorithm that reduces sparse matrix multiplication to dense (but smaller) rectangular matrix multiplication. Our running time thus depends on the optimal exponent $ω(a,b,c)$ of multiplying dense $n^a\times n^b$ by $n^b\times n^c$ matrices. We discover that when $m_{out}=Θ(m_{in}^r)$ the time complexity of sparse matrix multiplication is $O(m_{in}^{σ+ε})$, for all $ε> 0$, where $σ$ is the solution to the equation $ω(σ-1,2-σ,1+r-σ)=σ$. No matter what $ω(\cdot,\cdot,\cdot)$ turns out to be, and for all $r\in(0,2)$, the new bound beats the state of the art, and we provide evidence that it is optimal based on the complexity of the all-edge triangle problem. In particular, in terms of the input plus output size $m = m_{in} + m_{out}$ our algorithm runs in time $O(m^{1.3459})$. Even for Boolean matrices, this improves over the previous $m^{\frac{2ω}{ω+1}+ε}=O(m^{1.4071})$ bound [Amossen, Pagh; 2009], which was a natural barrier since it coincides with the longstanding bound of all-edge triangle in sparse graphs [Alon, Yuster, Zwick; 1994]. We find it interesting that matrix multiplication can be solved faster than triangle detection in this natural setting. In fact, we establish an equivalence to a special case of the all-edge triangle problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

On Diameter Approximation in Directed Graphs

Computing the diameter of a graph, i.e. the largest distance, is a fundamental problem that is central in fine-grained complexity. In undirected graphs, the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) yields a lower bound on the time vs. approximation trade-off that is quite close to the upper bounds. In \emph{directed} graphs, however, where only some of the upper bounds apply, much larger gaps remain. Since $d(u,v)$ may not be the same as $d(v,u)$, there are multiple ways to define the problem, the two most natural being the \emph{(one-way) diameter} ($\max_{(u,v)} d(u,v)$) and the \emph{roundtrip diameter} ($\max_{u,v} d(u,v)+d(v,u)$). In this paper we make progress on the outstanding open question for each of them. -- We design the first algorithm for diameter in sparse directed graphs to achieve $n^{1.5-\varepsilon}$ time with an approximation factor better than $2$. The new upper bound trade-off makes the directed case appear more similar to the undirected case. Notably, this is the first algorithm for diameter in sparse graphs that benefits from fast matrix multiplication. -- We design new hardness reductions separating roundtrip diameter from directed and undirected diameter. In particular, a $1.5$-approximation in subquadratic time would refute the All-Nodes $k$-Cycle hypothesis, and any $(2-\varepsilon)$-approximation would imply a breakthrough algorithm for approximate $\ell_{\infty}$-Closest-Pair. Notably, these are the first conditional lower bounds for diameter that are not based on SETH.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

On Complexity of 1-Center in Various Metrics

We consider the classic 1-center problem: Given a set $P$ of $n$ points in a metric space find the point in $P$ that minimizes the maximum distance to the other points of $P$. We study the complexity of this problem in $d$-dimensional $\ell_p$-metrics and in edit and Ulam metrics over strings of length $d$. Our results for the 1-center problem may be classified based on $d$ as follows. $\bullet$ Small $d$: Assuming the hitting set conjecture (HSC), we show that when $d=ω(\log n)$, no subquadratic algorithm can solve 1-center problem in any of the $\ell_p$-metrics, or in edit or Ulam metrics. $\bullet$ Large $d$: When $d=Ω(n)$, we extend our conditional lower bound to rule out subquartic algorithms for 1-center problem in edit metric (assuming Quantified SETH). On the other hand, we give a $(1+ε)$-approximation for 1-center in Ulam metric with running time $\tilde{O_{\varepsilon}}(nd+n^2\sqrt{d})$. We also strengthen some of the above lower bounds by allowing approximations or by reducing the dimension $d$, but only against a weaker class of algorithms which list all requisite solutions. Moreover, we extend one of our hardness results to rule out subquartic algorithms for the well-studied 1-median problem in the edit metric, where given a set of $n$ strings each of length $n$, the goal is to find a string in the set that minimizes the sum of the edit distances to the rest of the strings in the set.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

What Else Can Voronoi Diagrams Do For Diameter In Planar Graphs?

The Voronoi diagrams technique was introduced by Cabello to compute the diameter of planar graphs in subquadratic time. We present novel applications of this technique in static, fault-tolerant, and partially-dynamic undirected unweighted planar graphs, as well as some new limitations. 1. In the static case, we give $n^{3+o(1)}/D^2$ and $\tilde{O}(n\cdot D^2)$ time algorithms for computing the diameter of a planar graph $G$ with diameter $D$. These are faster than the state of the art $\tilde{O}(n^{5/3})$ when $D n^{2/3}$. 2. In the fault-tolerant setting, we give an $n^{7/3+o(1)}$ time algorithm for computing the diameter of $G\setminus \{e\}$ for every edge $e$ in $G$ the replacement diameter problem. Compared to the naive $\tilde{O}(n^{8/3})$ time algorithm that runs the static algorithm for every edge. 3. In the incremental setting, where we wish to maintain the diameter while while adding edges, we present an algorithm with total running time $n^{7/3+o(1)}$. Compared to the naive $\tilde{O}(n^{8/3})$ time algorithm that runs the static algorithm after every update. 4. We give a lower bound (conditioned on the SETH) ruling out an amortized $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ update time for maintaining the diameter in *weighted* planar graph. The lower bound holds even for incremental or decremental updates. Our upper bounds are obtained by novel uses and manipulations of Voronoi diagrams. These include maintaining the Voronoi diagram when edges of the graph are deleted, allowing the sites of the Voronoi diagram to lie on a BFS tree level (rather than on boundaries of $r$-division), and a new reduction from incremental diameter to incremental distance oracles that could be of interest beyond planar graphs. Our lower bound is the first lower bound for a dynamic planar graph problem that is conditioned on the SETH.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Can You Solve Closest String Faster than Exhaustive Search?

We study the fundamental problem of finding the best string to represent a given set, in the form of the Closest String problem: Given a set $X \subseteq Σ^d$ of $n$ strings, find the string $x^*$ minimizing the radius of the smallest Hamming ball around $x^*$ that encloses all the strings in $X$. In this paper, we investigate whether the Closest String problem admits algorithms that are faster than the trivial exhaustive search algorithm. We obtain the following results for the two natural versions of the problem: $\bullet$ In the continuous Closest String problem, the goal is to find the solution string $x^*$ anywhere in $Σ^d$. For binary strings, the exhaustive search algorithm runs in time $O(2^d poly(nd))$ and we prove that it cannot be improved to time $O(2^{(1-ε) d} poly(nd))$, for any $ε> 0$, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. $\bullet$ In the discrete Closest String problem, $x^*$ is required to be in the input set $X$. While this problem is clearly in polynomial time, its fine-grained complexity has been pinpointed to be quadratic time $n^{2 \pm o(1)}$ whenever the dimension is $ω(\log n) < d < n^{o(1)}$. We complement this known hardness result with new algorithms, proving essentially that whenever $d$ falls out of this hard range, the discrete Closest String problem can be solved faster than exhaustive search. In the small-$d$ regime, our algorithm is based on a novel application of the inclusion-exclusion principle. Interestingly, all of our results apply (and some are even stronger) to the natural dual of the Closest String problem, called the Remotest String problem, where the task is to find a string maximizing the Hamming distance to all the strings in $X$.

cs.CC↗