Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Amir M. Ben-Amram

Publications and source records attributed to Amir M. Ben-Amram.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Termination Analysis of Linear-Constraint Programs

This paper provides an overview of techniques in termination analysis for programs with numerical variables and transitions defined by linear constraints. This subarea of program analysis is challenging due to the existence of undecidable problems, and this Survey systematically explores approaches that mitigate this inherent difficulty. These include foundational decidability results, the use of ranking functions, and disjunctive well-founded transition invariants. The Survey also discusses non-termination witnesses, used to prove that a program will not halt. We examine the algorithmic and complexity aspects of these methods, showing how different approaches offer a trade-off between expressive power and computational complexity. The Survey does not discuss how termination analysis is performed on real-world programming languages, nor does it consider more expressive abstract models that include non-linear arithmetic, probabilistic choice, or term rewriting systems.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2025

Ranking Functions for Linear-Constraint Loops

In this paper we study the complexity of the problems: given a loop, described by linear constraints over a finite set of variables, is there a linear or lexicographical-linear ranking function for this loop? While existence of such functions implies termination, these problems are not equivalent to termination. When the variables range over the rationals (or reals), it is known that both problems are PTIME decidable. However, when they range over the integers, whether for single-path or multipath loops, the complexity has not yet been determined. We show that both problems are coNP-complete. However, we point out some special cases of importance of PTIME complexity. We also present complete algorithms for synthesizing linear and lexicographical-linear ranking functions, both for the general case and the special PTIME cases. Moreover, in the rational setting, our algorithm for synthesizing lexicographical-linear ranking functions extends existing ones, because our class of ranking functions is more general, yet it has polynomial time complexity.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2020

Tight Polynomial Worst-Case Bounds for Loop Programs

In 2008, Ben-Amram, Jones and Kristiansen showed that for a simple programming language - representing non-deterministic imperative programs with bounded loops, and arithmetics limited to addition and multiplication - it is possible to decide precisely whether a program has certain growth-rate properties, in particular whether a computed value, or the program's running time, has a polynomial growth rate. A natural and intriguing problem was to move from answering the decision problem to giving a quantitative result, namely, a tight polynomial upper bound. This paper shows how to obtain asymptotically-tight, multivariate, disjunctive polynomial bounds for this class of programs. This is a complete solution: whenever a polynomial bound exists it will be found. A pleasant surprise is that the algorithm is quite simple; but it relies on some subtle reasoning. An important ingredient in the proof is the forest factorization theorem, a strong structural result on homomorphisms into a finite monoid.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2019

Multiphase-Linear Ranking Functions and their Relation to Recurrent Sets

Multiphase ranking functions (M$Φ$RFs) are tuples $\langle f_1,\ldots,f_d \rangle$ of linear functions that are often used to prove termination of loops in which the computation progresses through a number of "phases". Our work provides new insights regarding such functions for loops described by a conjunction of linear constraints (Single-Path Constraint loops). The decision problem existence of a M$Φ$RF asks to determine whether a given SLC loop admits a M$Φ$RF, and the corresponding bounded decision problem restricts the search to M$Φ$RFs of depth $d$, where the parameter $d$ is part of the input. The algorithmic and complexity aspects of the bounded problem have been completely settled in a recent work. In this paper we make progress regarding the existence problem, without a given depth bound. In particular, we present an approach that reveals some important insights into the structure of these functions. Interestingly, it relates the problem of seeking M$Φ$RFs to that of seeking recurrent sets (used to prove non-termination). It also helps in identifying classes of loops for which M$Φ$RFs are sufficient. Our research has led to a new representation for single-path loops, the difference polyhedron replacing the customary transition polyhedron. This representation yields new insights on M$Φ$RFs and SLC loops in general. For example, a result on bounded SLC loops becomes straightforward.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2017

On Multiphase-Linear Ranking Functions

Multiphase ranking functions ($\mathit{MΦRFs}$) were proposed as a means to prove the termination of a loop in which the computation progresses through a number of "phases", and the progress of each phase is described by a different linear ranking function. Our work provides new insights regarding such functions for loops described by a conjunction of linear constraints (single-path loops). We provide a complete polynomial-time solution to the problem of existence and of synthesis of $\mathit{MΦRF}$ of bounded depth (number of phases), when variables range over rational or real numbers; a complete solution for the (harder) case that variables are integer, with a matching lower-bound proof, showing that the problem is coNP-complete; and a new theorem which bounds the number of iterations for loops with $\mathit{MΦRFs}$. Surprisingly, the bound is linear, even when the variables involved change in non-linear way. We also consider a type of lexicographic ranking functions, $\mathit{LLRFs}$, more expressive than types of lexicographic functions for which complete solutions have been given so far. We prove that for the above type of loops, lexicographic functions can be reduced to $\mathit{MΦRFs}$, and thus the questions of complexity of detection and synthesis, and of resulting iteration bounds, are also answered for this class.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2016

Flowchart Programs, Regular Expressions, and Decidability of Polynomial Growth-Rate

We present a new method for inferring complexity properties for a class of programs in the form of flowcharts annotated with loop information. Specifically, our method can (soundly and completely) decide if computed values are polynomially bounded as a function of the input; and similarly for the running time. Such complexity properties are undecidable for a Turing-complete programming language, and a common work-around in program analysis is to settle for sound but incomplete solutions. In contrast, we consider a class of programs that is Turing-incomplete, but strong enough to include several challenges for this kind of analysis. For a related language that has well-structured syntax, similar to Meyer and Ritchie's LOOP programs, the problem has been previously proved to be decidable. The analysis relied on the compositionality of programs, hence the challenge in obtaining similar results for flowchart programs with arbitrary control-flow graphs. Our answer to the challenge is twofold: first, we propose a class of loop-annotated flowcharts, which is more general than the class of flowcharts that directly represent structured programs; secondly, we present a technique to reuse the ideas from the work on tructured programs and apply them to such flowcharts. The technique is inspired by the classic translation of non-deterministic automata to regular expressions, but we obviate the exponential cost of constructing such an expression, obtaining a polynomial-time analysis. These ideas may well be applicable to other analysis problems.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2015

Complexity of Bradley-Manna-Sipma Lexicographic Ranking Functions

In this paper we turn the spotlight on a class of lexicographic ranking functions introduced by Bradley, Manna and Sipma in a seminal CAV 2005 paper, and establish for the first time the complexity of some problems involving the inference of such functions for linear-constraint loops (without precondition). We show that finding such a function, if one exists, can be done in polynomial time in a way which is sound and complete when the variables range over the rationals (or reals). We show that when variables range over the integers, the problem is harder -- deciding the existence of a ranking function is coNP-complete. Next, we study the problem of minimizing the number of components in the ranking function (a.k.a. the dimension). This number is interesting in contexts like computing iteration bounds and loop parallelization. Surprisingly, and unlike the situation for some other classes of lexicographic ranking functions, we find that even deciding whether a two-component ranking function exists is harder than the unrestricted problem: NP-complete over the rationals and $Σ^P_2$-complete over the integers.

cs.PL↗
arXiv2014

The Hardness of Finding Linear Ranking Functions for Lasso Programs

Finding whether a linear-constraint loop has a linear ranking function is an important key to understanding the loop behavior, proving its termination and establishing iteration bounds. If no preconditions are provided, the decision problem is known to be in coNP when variables range over the integers and in PTIME for the rational numbers, or real numbers. Here we show that deciding whether a linear-constraint loop with a precondition, specifically with partially-specified input, has a linear ranking function is EXPSPACE-hard over the integers, and PSPACE-hard over the rationals. The precise complexity of these decision problems is yet unknown. The EXPSPACE lower bound is derived from the reachability problem for Petri nets (equivalently, Vector Addition Systems), and possibly indicates an even stronger lower bound (subject to open problems in VAS theory). The lower bound for the rationals follows from a novel simulation of Boolean programs. Lower bounds are also given for the problem of deciding if a linear ranking-function supported by a particular form of inductive invariant exists. For loops over integers, the problem is PSPACE-hard for convex polyhedral invariants and EXPSPACE-hard for downward-closed sets of natural numbers as invariants.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2014

Bounded Termination of Monotonicity-Constraint Transition Systems

Intuitively, if we can prove that a program terminates, we expect some conclusion regarding its complexity. But the passage from termination proofs to complexity bounds is not always clear. In this work we consider Monotonicity Constraint Transition Systems, a program abstraction where termination is decidable (based on the size-change termination principle). We show that these programs also have a decidable complexity property: one can determine whether the length of all transition sequences can be bounded in terms of the initial state. This is the Bounded Termination problem. Interestingly, if a bound exists, it must be polynomial. We prove that the bounded termination problem is PSPACE-complete. We also discuss, theoretically, the use of bounds on the abstract program to infer conclusions on a concrete program that has been abstracted. The conclusion maybe a polynomial time bound, or in other cases polynomial space or exponential time. We argue that the monotonicity-constraint abstraction promises to be useful for practical complexity analysis of programs.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2013

A Comment on Budach's Mouse-in-an-Octant Problem

Budach's Mouse-in-an-Octant Problem (attributed to Lothar Budach in a 1980 article by van Emde Boas and Karpinski) concerns the behaviour of a very simple finite-state machine ("the mouse") moving on the integer two-dimensional grid. Its decidability is apparently still open. This note sketches a proof that an extended version of the problem (a super-mouse) is undecidable.

cs.FL↗
arXiv2011

Monotonicity Constraints for Termination in the Integer Domain

Size-Change Termination (SCT) is a method of proving program termination based on the impossibility of infinite descent. To this end we use a program abstraction in which transitions are described by Monotonicity Constraints over (abstract) variables. When only constraints of the form x>y' and x\geq y' are allowed, we have size-change graphs. In the last decade, both theory and practice have evolved significantly in this restricted framework. The crucial underlying assumption of most of the past work is that the domain of the variables is well-founded. In a recent paper I showed how to extend and adapt some theory from the domain of size-change graphs to general monotonicity constraints, thus complementing previous work, but remaining in the realm of well-founded domains. However, monotonicity constraints are, interestingly, capable of proving termination also in the integer domain, which is not well-founded. The purpose of this paper is to explore the application of monotonicity constraints in this domain. We lay the necessary theoretical foundation, and present precise decision procedures for termination; finally, we provide a procedure to construct explicit global ranking functions from monotonicity constraints in singly-exponential time, and of optimal worst-case size and dimension (ordinal).

cs.LO↗
arXiv2011

SAT-Based Termination Analysis Using Monotonicity Constraints over the Integers

We describe an algorithm for proving termination of programs abstracted to systems of monotonicity constraints in the integer domain. Monotonicity constraints are a non-trivial extension of the well-known size-change termination method. While deciding termination for systems of monotonicity constraints is PSPACE complete, we focus on a well-defined and significant subset, which we call MCNP, designed to be amenable to a SAT-based solution. Our technique is based on the search for a special type of ranking function defined in terms of bounded differences between multisets of integer values. We describe the application of our approach as the back-end for the termination analysis of Java Bytecode (JBC). At the front-end, systems of monotonicity constraints are obtained by abstracting information, using two different termination analyzers: AProVE and COSTA. Preliminary results reveal that our approach provides a good trade-off between precision and cost of analysis.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2011

Size-Change Termination, Monotonicity Constraints and Ranking Functions

Size-Change Termination (SCT) is a method of proving program termination based on the impossibility of infinite descent. To this end we may use a program abstraction in which transitions are described by monotonicity constraints over (abstract) variables. When only constraints of the form x>y' and x>=y' are allowed, we have size-change graphs. Both theory and practice are now more evolved in this restricted framework then in the general framework of monotonicity constraints. This paper shows that it is possible to extend and adapt some theory from the domain of size-change graphs to the general case, thus complementing previous work on monotonicity constraints. In particular, we present precise decision procedures for termination; and we provide a procedure to construct explicit global ranking functions from monotonicity constraints in singly-exponential time, which is better than what has been published so far even for size-change graphs.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2010

On Decidable Growth-Rate Properties of Imperative Programs

In 2008, Ben-Amram, Jones and Kristiansen showed that for a simple "core" programming language - an imperative language with bounded loops, and arithmetics limited to addition and multiplication - it was possible to decide precisely whether a program had certain growth-rate properties, namely polynomial (or linear) bounds on computed values, or on the running time. This work emphasized the role of the core language in mitigating the notorious undecidability of program properties, so that one deals with decidable problems. A natural and intriguing problem was whether more elements can be added to the core language, improving its utility, while keeping the growth-rate properties decidable. In particular, the method presented could not handle a command that resets a variable to zero. This paper shows how to handle resets. The analysis is given in a logical style (proof rules), and its complexity is shown to be PSPACE-complete (in contrast, without resets, the problem was PTIME). The analysis algorithm evolved from the previous solution in an interesting way: focus was shifted from proving a bound to disproving it, and the algorithm works top-down rather than bottom-up.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2009

The Euler Path to Static Level-Ancestors

Suppose that a rooted tree T is given for preprocessing. The Level-Ancestor Problem is to answer quickly queries of the following form. Given a vertex v and an integer i > 0, find the i-th vertex on the path from the root to v. Algorithms that achieve a linear time bound for preprocessing and a constant time bound for a query have been published by Dietz (1991), Alstrup and Holm (2000), and Bender and Farach (2002). The first two algorithms address dynamic versions of the problem; the last addresses the static version only and is the simplest so far. The purpose of this note is to expose another simple algorithm, derived from a complicated PRAM algorithm by Berkman and Vishkin (1990,1994). We further show some easy extensions of its functionality, adding queries for descendants and level successors as well as ancestors, extensions for which the formerly known algorithms are less suitable.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2009

Ranking Functions for Size-Change Termination II

Size-Change Termination is an increasingly-popular technique for verifying program termination. These termination proofs are deduced from an abstract representation of the program in the form of "size-change graphs". We present algorithms that, for certain classes of size-change graphs, deduce a global ranking function: an expression that ranks program states, and decreases on every transition. A ranking function serves as a witness for a termination proof, and is therefore interesting for program certification. The particular form of the ranking expressions that represent SCT termination proofs sheds light on the scope of the proof method. The complexity of the expressions is also interesting, both practicaly and theoretically. While deducing ranking functions from size-change graphs has already been shown possible, the constructions in this paper are simpler and more transparent than previously known. They improve the upper bound on the size of the ranking expression from triply exponential down to singly exponential (for certain classes of instances). We claim that this result is, in some sense, optimal. To this end, we introduce a framework for lower bounds on the complexity of ranking expressions and prove exponential lower bounds.

cs.LO↗