arXiv subjects

Amirhossein Yousefiramandi

Publications and source records attributed to Amirhossein Yousefiramandi.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Rescuing Points Trapped Inside Incorrect Decision Regions: A target for Evaluating and Improving Forward-Forward Learning

Forward-Forward learning replaces end-to-end backpropagation with local, layer-wise training objectives. Its variants are evaluated primarily by classification accuracy, often measured with linear probes trained on their representations. We show that this evaluation can over-credit the learning method: a linear probe on the representations of an untrained convolutional neural network already reaches accuracy well above chance. Moreover, a single accuracy value does not reveal which datapoints become correctly classified after training and which remain misclassified. To examine what learning contributes beyond the random, untrained baseline, we present an analysis methodology built on the Boundary Proximity Index (BPI), a multiclass margin normalized by a class-centroid reference. We apply our analysis to seven Forward-Forward variants and related layer-local methods and find that initially misclassified points near the probe's decision boundary generally have higher rescue rates than those farther inside incorrect decision regions. Rescue rates vary substantially across methods, with some correcting a substantial fraction of these deeply embedded points. Together, these analyses offer a way to evaluate representation learning beyond accuracy and identify the rescue of points far inside incorrect decision regions as a target for improving local learning methods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Cumulative-Goodness Free-Riding in Forward-Forward Networks: Real, Repairable, but Not Accuracy-Dominant

Forward-Forward (FF) training lets each layer learn from a local goodness criterion. In cumulative-goodness variants, later layers can inherit a task that earlier layers have partly separated. We formalize this as layer free-riding: under the softplus FF criterion, the class-discrimination gradient reaching block $d$ decays exponentially with the positive margin accumulated by earlier blocks (Theorem 3.1); a squared-hinge barrier reproduces the pathology. History-free and hardness-gated repairs raise deeper-layer separation by up to $5\times$ on CIFAR-100 and $45\times$ in an 8-block CIFAR-10 model, yet these and a depth-scaled auxiliary term move accuracy by under one percentage point among non-degenerate variants; on Tiny ImageNet, a harder cross-dataset check of the selected configuration, layer health likewise does not track accuracy. A theory-derived attenuation-compensated objective raises deepest-block separation $5.9\times$ at a consistent cost in the FF classifier's own accuracy that a probe trained on the frozen features recovers; in a smaller CIFAR-10 control, most of its separation gain comes from dropping the depth-scaled auxiliary term it replaces. Accuracy invariance is a property of the deployed sum-based scoring rule under redistribution (Proposition 3.2) and, empirically, of the structured trained readouts we test, not of what the network learns: retrained variants disagree on 13-26% of test predictions. Architecture and augmentation matter far more than the non-degenerate training rules studied. Cumulative free-riding is therefore a real and repairable pathology, but for the softplus and squared-hinge objectives, architectures, and datasets we study, it is not the dominant factor limiting accuracy.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

When Does Synthetic Patent Data Help? Volume-Fidelity Trade-offs in Low-Resource Multi-Label Classification

The issues that must be considered regarding the utilization of synthetic data generated through LLMs for multilabel patent classification include (i) when the use of such data may help and (ii) why. Indeed, the former part appropriately adjusts for the possibility of improving results by an increase in sample size. The current experiment involves six open-source LLMs (from 3.8B to 12B parameters) for four real-data regimes in classification of 64 WIPO labels of assistive technologies. Both full-synthesis generation, conditioned on the label set, and paraphrasing methods are applied, with each used in combination with three classifier categories. It is shown that the claimed improvements in micro F1 for BERT-for-Patents from 0.120 to 0.702 mainly reflect a volume effect; indeed, replication with replacement in 165 examples produces 0.678. Thus, the improvement over the control is +0.024, while compared to the best baseline (focal loss reweighting) is +0.219. The second crucial point to consider here is that of evolving fidelity scores as the data generation regime varies. For low real-data regimes, the volume effect dominates and the correlation coefficient between maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) and classification performance equals r = +0.95. As more real data is used, the correlation becomes inverted and reaches r = -0.73 at the 1:10 regime (Fisher z = +6.47, p < 0.001, 95% CI on Delta r [ +0.96, +1.00 ]). In terms of a fixed budget allocation, combining real data (about 20-30%) with synthetic (70-80%) outperforms both purely synthetic and purely real strategies. Moreover, a corpus that allows for improvement in classification performance up to +0.58 in raw micro F1 may adversely affect a Jaccard-overlap retrieval proxy. Prompt-family variations for other genres may provide some explanation of the phenomenon, but using the standard-patent filter still decreases nDCG@10 by 26%.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Patent Embeddings: A Multi-Task Evaluation of 22 Models Across Retrieval, Classification, and Clustering

Two questions regarding practitioners' use of patent embeddings arise: (i) Does one fine-tuning recipe suffice for all downstream applications? (ii) Is fine-tuning on one patent landscape sufficient for downstream application on other landscapes? By evaluating 22 pre-trained embedding models (ranging from 22M to 12B parameters) on three tasks -- information retrieval, classification, and clustering -- on 113,148 WIPO patents for assistive technology (46,069 citation queries) and on an external DAPFAM dataset, we find that two results cast doubt on the prevailing wisdom. (i) The optimal fine-tuning recipe depends on the downstream task: cross-sectional alignment (recipe R3) provides the largest improvements to retrieval performance (+7.1% nDCG@10), whereas a combined signal recipe (recipe R4) is better suited to classification (+7.1 F1) and clustering (+10.9 V-measure); a matched data control confirms that differences in training dataset size are not a contributing factor. (ii) Single-landscape fine-tuning hampers cross-landscape information retrieval: fine-tuning on one landscape significantly degrades cross-domain retrieval for 5 of 8 model-recipe combinations on the DAPFAM corpus, with the stronger zero-shot models suffering most. While within-family scaling is consistent (Qwen3 0.6B->4B->8B; Llama-Nemotron 1B->8B), cross-family scaling is erratic; the 12B KaLM-Gemma3 is ranked 8th on TAC retrieval performance, following prefix modification. Title+Abstract+Claims is the ubiquitous best text view, and all models suffer from a 55-65% gap between IN and OUT-of-domain performance which cannot be mitigated by hybrid BM25-dense fusion. Code and evaluation framework are publicly available.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Fine-Tuning Causal LLMs for Text Classification: Embedding-Based vs. Instruction-Based Approaches

We explore efficient strategies to fine-tune decoder-only Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream text classification under resource constraints. Two approaches are investigated: (1) attaching a classification head to a pretrained causal LLM and fine-tuning it on the task, using the LLM's final-token embedding as a sequence representation, and (2) instruction-tuning the LLM in a prompt-to-response format for classification. To enable single-GPU fine-tuning of models up to 8B parameters, we combine 4-bit model quantization with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for parameter-efficient training. Experiments on two patent benchmarks, a 5-class single-label internal corpus and the public WIPO-Alpha multi-label dataset with 14 categories, show that the embedding-head approach matches or exceeds fine-tuned BERT baselines on single-label classification while training 10-30x fewer parameters. Instruction-tuning is competitive only in the multi-label regime, and only with substantially larger trainable budgets of at least 100M parameters. These results demonstrate that directly leveraging the internal representations of causal LLMs, together with efficient fine-tuning techniques, yields strong classification performance under limited computational resources. We discuss the advantages of each approach and outline practical guidelines and future directions for optimizing LLM fine-tuning in classification scenarios.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Learning Selective Merge Policies for Deadline-Constrained Coded Caching via Deep Reinforcement Learning

In the coded caching, the server uses the cached information at the users to serve multiple users in parallel with a single coded multi-casting message or packet, that is, a merged packet, and thus mitigates the peak network congestion. In order to deliver the timely messages to the users in the deadline-driven applications like the video streaming, we must determine online the messages to be merged for the delivery, as there is a time limit for each request. It is important to note that while the merging aids the current coded multi-casting packet, it could harm the future deliveries. Our solution employs the deep reinforcement learning to view the coded multi-casting delivery as a masked action-discrete state control problem, and our policy network, trained via the proximal policy optimization, performs better than SACM++. On the uniform-demand benchmark, our policy network reduces the broadcast-packet expiration ratio $ρ$ by $40.9\%$ ($0.208$ vs.\ $0.352$) with respect to the best coded multi-casting baseline (SACM++), while also attaining the best broadcast-efficiency score $σ$ across the Track~A battery among the coded multi-casting methods. One noteworthy phenomenon here is that, for the applications with stricter deadlines, the merging becomes selective instead of aggressive, since the policy network selectively merges at approximately $31.8\%$ of the chances, even though the same observation holds across the variations within the same simulator family. The focus of our design is on the efficient pairwise XOR merging, where the higher-order ($K{\ge}3$) coding can be considered as a natural generalization left for future work.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2025

Patent Language Model Pretraining with ModernBERT

Transformer-based language models such as BERT have become foundational in NLP, yet their performance degrades in specialized domains like patents, which contain long, technical, and legally structured text. Prior approaches to patent NLP have primarily relied on fine-tuning general-purpose models or domain-adapted variants pretrained with limited data. In this work, we pretrain 3 domain-specific masked language models for patents, using the ModernBERT architecture and a curated corpus of over 60 million patent records. Our approach incorporates architectural optimizations, including FlashAttention, rotary embeddings, and GLU feed-forward layers. We evaluate our models on four downstream patent classification tasks. Our model, ModernBERT-base-PT, consistently outperforms the general-purpose ModernBERT baseline on three out of four datasets and achieves competitive performance with a baseline PatentBERT. Additional experiments with ModernBERT-base-VX and Mosaic-BERT-large demonstrate that scaling the model size and customizing the tokenizer further enhance performance on selected tasks. Notably, all ModernBERT variants retain substantially faster inference over - 3x that of PatentBERT - underscoring their suitability for time-sensitive applications. These results underscore the benefits of domain-specific pretraining and architectural improvements for patent-focused NLP tasks.

cs.CL↗