Polynomial-Factor Deterministic NP-Hardness for SVP in Every lp Norm with p > 2
For every constant $2 2$ of Hair and Sahai [STOC'26].
arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Amit Sahai.
For every constant $2 2$ of Hair and Sahai [STOC'26].
An \emph{$n$-divisor set} is a finite set of positive integers containing a multiple of every integer from $1$ through $n$. Umans and Wang proposed, as the arithmetic-progression version of their Strong $(\alpha,\beta)$-Divisor Conjecture, an $n$-divisor arithmetic progression having at most $n^{2\beta}$ terms, each of magnitude at most $\exp(n^\alpha)$. We prove unconditionally that an $n$-divisor arithmetic progression of height $H$ with $\log H=o(\sqrt n)$ must have length \[ L\ge \left(\sqrt{\frac{8}{27}}-o(1)\right) \frac{n^{3/4}}{\sqrt{\log n}}. \] Consequently, the arithmetic-progression version is false whenever $\alpha<1/2$ and $\beta<3/8$. In particular, it is false at the proposed point $(\alpha,\beta)=(1/3,1/3)$, even if both bounds are relaxed by $n^{o(1)}$ at the exponent level. The proof uses primes in a fixed band below $\sqrt n$ to turn semiprime divisibility into a finite incidence structure. An elementary bounded-degree linear-space estimate then gives the result. This theorem concerns the one-dimensional arithmetic-progression version only; it does not disprove the higher-rank Strong Divisor Conjecture.
We give an unconditional construction of information-theoretically secure one-time private-key unclonable encryption scheme for one-bit messages, with efficient encryption and decryption and exponentially small unclonable-indistinguishability advantage.
Recent developments in AI for Mathematics (AI4Math), especially Large Language Model (LLM)-driven theorem provers, has achieved remarkable success in formal proof generation for well-defined mathematical problems through Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP) languages. However, current systems remain fundamentally limited in tackling frontier research mathematics, such as discovering new theorems or resolving open conjectures, which are often open-ended, under-specified, and involve multiple layers of abstraction. We argue that the next leap in AI4Math systems requires a decisive shift from predefined problem-solvers to research agents that can address frontier mathematical challenges with rigorous formal mathematical reasoning. In this position paper, we provide a systematic review of the field, covering datasets, auto-formalization, and proof synthesis. More importantly, we identify core limitations of existing systems in serving as mathematical research agents, examining issues across datasets, relational structure, mathematical exploration, tool ecosystem, and human-AI collaboration, outlining a strategic road-map for the future of AI4Math.
We prove a list recovery guarantee for random low-rate linear codes over sufficiently large prime fields. For fixed dimension $d$, error fraction $\alpha$, and accuracy parameter $\varepsilon$, a random $d$-dimensional linear code $C \subseteq \mathbb{F}_p^n$ is, with high probability, $(\alpha,\ell,\frac{1+\varepsilon}{1-\alpha}\ell)$-list recoverable simultaneously for all input list sizes $\ell\le 2^{O_{\alpha, \varepsilon, d}(n/\log n)}$. The proof is inspired by work of Matou\v{s}ek, P\v{r}\'{\i}v\v{e}tiv\'{y}, and \v{S}kovro\v{n} on reconstructing point sets from their projections. It combines a deterministic graph-theoretic certificate, a nonvanishing determinant criterion, and the Schwartz--Zippel lemma. We also give a lower bound showing that any linear code $C \subseteq \mathbb{F}_p^n$ of dimension at least two cannot be $(\alpha,\ell,\frac{1+\varepsilon}{1-\alpha}\ell)$-list recoverable for feasible list sizes $\ell \geq 2^{\Omega_{\alpha, \varepsilon}(n)}$. In this sense, our result is nearly optimal.
LLM watermarks must be detectable without compromising text quality, yet most existing schemes bias the next-token distribution and pay for detection with measurable quality loss. We present SLAM (Structural Linguistic Activation Marking), a novel white-box watermarking scheme that sidesteps this cost by writing the mark into structural geometry rather than token frequencies: sparse autoencoders identify residual-stream directions encoding linguistic structure (e.g., voice, tense, clause order), and we causally steer those directions at generation time, leaving lexical sampling and semantics unconstrained. On Gemma-2 2B and 9B, SLAM achieves 100% detection accuracy with a quality cost of only 1-2 reward points - compared to 7.5-11.5 for KGW, EWD, and Unigram - with naturalness and diversity preserved at near-unwatermarked levels across both models. The trade-off is a complementary robustness profile: SLAM resists word-level edits but is vulnerable to paraphrase that restructures syntax (at a quality cost), the converse of token-distribution methods.
We give a public key encryption scheme with plausible quasi-exponential security based on the conjectured intractability of two constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), both of which are instantiated with a corruption rate of $1 - o(1)$. First, we conjecture the hardness of a new large alphabet random predicate CSP (LARP-CSP) defined over an arbitrary but strongly expanding factor graph, where the vast majority of predicate outputs are replaced with random outputs. Second, we conjecture the hardness of the standard $k$XOR problem defined over a random factor graph, again where the vast majority of parity computations are replaced with random bits. In support of our hardness conjecture for LARP-CSPs, we give a variety of lower bounds, ruling out many natural attacks including all known attacks that exploit non-random factor graphs. Our public key encryption scheme is the first to leverage high corruption CSPs while simultaneously achieving a plausible security level far above quasi-polynomial. At the heart of our work is a new method for planting cryptographic trapdoors based on the label extended factor graph for a CSP. Along the way to achieving our result, we give the first uniform construction of an error-correcting code that has an expanding, low density generator matrix while simultaneously allowing for efficient decoding from a $1 - o(1)$ fraction of corruptions.
We show that, assuming NP $\not\subseteq$ $\cap_{\delta > 0}$DTIME$\left(\exp{n^\delta}\right)$, the shortest vector problem for lattices of rank $n$ in any finite $\ell_p$ norm is hard to approximate within a factor of $2^{(\log n)^{1 - o(1)}}$, via a deterministic reduction. Previously, for the Euclidean case $p=2$, even hardness of the exact shortest vector problem was not known under a deterministic reduction.
Automated theorem proving (ATP) benchmarks largely consist of problems formalized in MathLib, so current ATP training and evaluation are heavily biased toward MathLib's definitional framework. However, frontier mathematics is often exploratory and prototype-heavy, relying on bespoke constructions that deviate from standard libraries. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of current ATP systems when applied to a novel definitional framework, specifically examining the performance gap between standard library problems and bespoke mathematical constructions. We introduce TaoBench, an undergraduate-level benchmark derived from Terence Tao's Analysis I, which formalizes analysis by constructing core mathematical concepts from scratch, without relying on standard Mathlib definitions, as well as by mixing from-scratch and MathLib constructions. For fair evaluation, we build an agentic pipeline that automatically extracts a compilable, self-contained local environment for each problem. To isolate the effect of definitional frameworks, we additionally translate every problem into a mathematically equivalent Mathlib formulation, yielding paired TaoBench-Mathlib statements for direct comparison. While state-of-the-art ATP models perform capably within the MathLib framework, performance drops by an average of roughly 26% on the definitionally equivalent Tao formulation. This indicates that the main bottleneck is limited generalization across definitional frameworks rather than task difficulty. TaoBench thus highlights a gap between benchmark performance and applicability, and provides a concrete foundation for developing and testing provers better aligned with research mathematics.
Training LLMs to think and reason for longer has become a key ingredient in building state-of-the-art models that can solve complex problems previously out of reach. Recent efforts pursue this in different ways, such as RL fine-tuning to elicit long CoT or scaling latent reasoning through architectural recurrence. This makes reasoning length an important scaling knob. In this work, we identify a novel phenomenon (both theoretically and experimentally): under outcome-only supervision, out-of-distribution (OOD) performance can continue improving as training-time reasoning length (e.g., the token budget in RL, or the loop count in looped Transformers) increases, even after in-distribution (ID) performance has saturated. This suggests that robustness may require a larger budget than ID validation alone would indicate. We provide theoretical explanations via two mechanisms: (i) self-iteration can induce a stronger inductive bias in the hypothesis class, reshaping ID-optimal solutions in ways that improve OOD generalization; and (ii) when shortcut solutions that work for ID samples but not for OOD samples persist in the hypothesis class, regularization can reduce the learned solution's reliance on these shortcuts as the number of self-iterations increases. We complement the theory with empirical evidence from two realizations of scaling training-time reasoning length: increasing the number of loops in looped Transformers on a synthetic task, and increasing token budgets during RL fine-tuning of LLMs on mathematical reasoning.
We prove that SVP$_p$ is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of $2^{\log^{1 - \varepsilon} n}$, for all constants $\varepsilon > 0$ and $p > 2$, under standard deterministic Karp reductions. This result is also the first proof that \emph{exact} SVP$_p$ is NP-hard in a finite $\ell_p$ norm. Hardness for SVP$_p$ with $p$ finite was previously only known if NP $\not \subseteq$ RP, and under that assumption, hardness of approximation was only known for all constant factors. As a corollary to our main theorem, we show that under the Sliding Scale Conjecture, SVP$_p$ is NP-hard to approximate within a small polynomial factor, for all constants $p > 2$. Our proof techniques are surprisingly elementary; we reduce from a \emph{regularized} PCP instance directly to the shortest vector problem by using simple gadgets related to Vandermonde matrices and Hadamard matrices.
In this work, we propose a new way to (non-interactively, verifiably) demonstrate quantum advantage by solving the average-case $\mathsf{NP}$ search problem of finding a solution to a system of (underdetermined) constant degree multivariate equations over the finite field $\mathbb{F}_2$ drawn from a specified distribution. In particular, for any $d \geq 2$, we design a distribution of degree up to $d$ polynomials $\{p_i(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\}_{i\in [m]}$ for $m 2$, it is classically hard to find one based on a thorough review of existing classical cryptanalysis. Our work thus posits that degree three functions are enough to instantiate the random oracle to obtain non-relativized quantum advantage. Our approach begins with the breakthrough Yamakawa-Zhandry (FOCS 2022) quantum algorithmic framework. In our work, we demonstrate that this quantum algorithmic framework extends to the setting of multivariate polynomial systems. Our key technical contribution is a new analysis on the Fourier spectra of distributions induced by a general family of distributions over $\mathbb{F}_2$ multivariate polynomials -- those that satisfy $2$-wise independence and shift-invariance. This family of distributions includes the distribution of uniform random degree at most $d$ polynomials for any constant $d \geq 2$. Our analysis opens up potentially new directions for quantum cryptanalysis of other multivariate systems.
Watermarking AI-generated text is critical for combating misuse. Yet recent theoretical work argues that any watermark can be erased via random walk attacks that perturb text while preserving quality. However, such attacks rely on two key assumptions: (1) rapid mixing (watermarks dissolve quickly under perturbations) and (2) reliable quality preservation (automated quality oracles perfectly guide edits). Through large-scale experiments and human-validated assessments, we find mixing is slow: 100% of perturbed texts retain traces of their origin after hundreds of edits, defying rapid mixing. Oracles falter, as state-of-the-art quality detectors misjudge edits (77% accuracy), compounding errors during attacks. Ultimately, attacks underperform: automated walks remove watermarks just 26% of the time -- dropping to 10% under human quality review. These findings challenge the inevitability of watermark removal. Instead, practical barriers -- slow mixing and imperfect quality control -- reveal watermarking to be far more robust than theoretical models suggest. The gap between idealized attacks and real-world feasibility underscores the need for stronger watermarking methods and more realistic attack models.
In this work, we propose a new way to (non-interactively, verifiably) demonstrate Quantum Advantage by solving the average-case $\mathsf{NP}$ search problem of finding a solution to a system of (underdetermined) multivariate quadratic equations over the finite field $\mathbb{F}_2$ drawn from a specified distribution. In particular, we design a distribution of degree-2 polynomials $\{p_i(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\}_{i\in [m]}$ for $m<n$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$ for which we show that there is a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that simultaneously solves $\{p_i(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=y_i\}_{i\in [m]}$ for a random vector $(y_1,\ldots,y_m)$. On the other hand, while a solution exists with high probability, we conjecture that it is classically hard to find one based on classical cryptanalysis that we provide, including a comprehensive review of all known relevant classical algorithms for solving multivariate quadratics. Our approach proceeds by examining the Yamakawa-Zhandry (FOCS 2022) quantum advantage scheme and replacing the role of the random oracle with our multivariate quadratic equations. Our work therefore gives several new perspectives: First, our algorithm gives a counterexample to the conventional belief that generic classically hard multivariate quadratic systems are also quantumly hard. Second, based on cryptanalytic evidence, our work gives an explicit simple replacement for the random oracle from the work of Yamakawa and Zhandry. We show how to instantiate the random oracle with families of just degree two multivariate polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_2$.
Evaluations of creative stories generated by large language models (LLMs) often focus on objective properties of the text, such as its style, coherence, and diversity. While these metrics are indispensable, they do not speak to a story's subjective, psychological impact from a reader's perspective. We introduce the Psychological Depth Scale (PDS), a novel framework rooted in literary theory that measures an LLM's ability to produce authentic and narratively complex stories that provoke emotion, empathy, and engagement. We empirically validate our framework by showing that humans can consistently evaluate stories based on PDS (0.72 Krippendorff's alpha). We also explore techniques for automating the PDS to easily scale future analyses. GPT-4o, combined with a novel Mixture-of-Personas (MoP) prompting strategy, achieves an average Spearman correlation of 0.51 with human judgment while Llama-3-70B with constrained decoding scores as high as 0.68 for empathy. Finally, we compared the depth of stories authored by both humans and LLMs. Surprisingly, GPT-4 stories either surpassed or were statistically indistinguishable from highly-rated human-written stories sourced from Reddit. By shifting the focus from text to reader, the Psychological Depth Scale is a validated, automated, and systematic means of measuring the capacity of LLMs to connect with humans through the stories they tell.
In this work, we show how to construct indistinguishability obfuscation from subexponential hardness of four well-founded assumptions. We prove: Let $τ\in (0,\infty), δ\in (0,1), ε\in (0,1)$ be arbitrary constants. Assume sub-exponential security of the following assumptions, where $λ$ is a security parameter, and the parameters $\ell,k,n$ below are large enough polynomials in $λ$: - The SXDH assumption on asymmetric bilinear groups of a prime order $p = O(2^λ)$, - The LWE assumption over $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$ with subexponential modulus-to-noise ratio $2^{k^ε}$, where $k$ is the dimension of the LWE secret, - The LPN assumption over $\mathbb{Z}_p$ with polynomially many LPN samples and error rate $1/\ell^δ$, where $\ell$ is the dimension of the LPN secret, - The existence of a Boolean PRG in $\mathsf{NC}^0$ with stretch $n^{1+τ}$, Then, (subexponentially secure) indistinguishability obfuscation for all polynomial-size circuits exists.
Any $d$-regular graph on $n$ vertices with spectral expansion $λ$ satisfying $n = Ω(d^3\log(d)/λ)$ yields a $O\left(\frac{λ^{3/2}}{d}\right)$-non-malleable code for single-bit messages in the split-state model.
How much adversarial noise can protocols for interactive communication tolerate? This question was examined by Braverman and Rao (IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2014) for the case of "robust" protocols, where each party sends messages only in fixed and predetermined rounds. We consider a new class of non-robust protocols for Interactive Communication, which we call adaptive protocols. Such protocols adapt structurally to the noise induced by the channel in the sense that both the order of speaking, and the length of the protocol may vary depending on observed noise. We define models that capture adaptive protocols and study upper and lower bounds on the permissible noise rate in these models. When the length of the protocol may adaptively change according to the noise, we demonstrate a protocol that tolerates noise rates up to $1/3$. When the order of speaking may adaptively change as well, we demonstrate a protocol that tolerates noise rates up to $2/3$. Hence, adaptivity circumvents an impossibility result of $1/4$ on the fraction of tolerable noise (Braverman and Rao, 2014).