SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Amy Cochran

Publications and source records attributed to Amy Cochran.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Robust Power and Sample Size Calculations in Quasi-likelihood Models: Methods and Practice

Accurate power and sample size (PSS) calculations are essential for designing studies that use quasi-likelihood (QL) models, which extend generalized linear models (GLMs) to settings where the full distribution of the outcome is not specified. Traditional PSS approaches often rely on restrictive distributional assumptions, limiting their applicability when responses have non-standard distributions, variance functions are misspecified, or when predictors exhibit complex dependence structures. Building on recent advances in effect size measures for PSS - specifically, 2 Standard Deviations in the Linear Predictor (2SLiP) and Pseudo-Partial $R^2$ (P2R2) - developed with interpretability in mind, this paper extends and evaluates these effect size measures in the QL framework, keying in particular on their utility in PSS. We assess their empirical performance for the Wald test and then extend to the score test through extensive simulations across diverse outcome types, link functions, and variance structures. To illustrate practical utility, we applied these effect size measures to survey data on frontline health care workers from \citet{cahill2022occupational} to quantify the association between perceived personal protective equipment adequacy and mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, adjusting for covariates. Our findings demonstrate that both 2SLiP and P2R2 provide robust and interpretable alternatives to traditional methods, maintaining accuracy with minimal distributional assumptions and enhancing the flexibility of PSS for realistic study designs.

stat.ME

Designing a quasi-experiment to study the clinical impact of adaptive risk prediction models

Clinical risk prediction is a valuable tool for guiding healthcare interventions toward those most likely to benefit. Yet, evaluating the pairing of a risk prediction model with an intervention using randomized controlled trials presents substantial challenges, making quasi-experimental designs an attractive alternatives. Existing designs, however, assume that both the model and the decision rules used to trigger interventions (typically a risk threshold) remain fixed. This limits their utility in modern healthcare, where both are routinely updated. We introduce a regression discontinuity framework that accommodates adaptation in both the model and the risk threshold. We precisely characterize the form of interference introduced by these adaptations and exploit this structure to establish conditions for identification and thus design estimation strategies. The key idea is to define counterfactual risks-the scores patients would have received under hypothetical reorderings-thereby restoring local exchangeability and enabling valid estimation of the local average treatment effect. Our estimator leverages the fact that, although counterfactual risk vectors grow with time, they typically lie in a low-dimensional space. In simulations of cardiovascular prevention programs, we show that our method accurately recovers treatment effects even as thresholds adapt to meet operational or clinical targets and models are updated to align predicted and observed outcomes or to exclude demographic predictors such as race.

stat.ME

A proxy-based approach for unmeasured confounding in electronic health records research

Electronic health records (EHR) are widely used to study clinical decisions, yet unmeasured confounding remains a persistent challenge. Proxy variables offer a potential solution. In EHR data, clinicians already record many such measurements (e.g., vitals), each revealing something about a patient's underlying health. Despite this, proxy-based methods are rarely used in practice. We introduce a new way to use proxies to adjust for unmeasured confounding. Our approach uses a vector of proxies to construct covariates that capture aspects of the unmeasured confounder, which are then included in a regression model. As one implementation, we use factor analysis followed by regression. We compare this approach with existing methods, including proximal causal inference, across a range of realistic settings. In practice, assumptions rarely hold exactly, so we study what happens when models are misspecified and variables are used incorrectly: e.g., a confounder or instrument is treated as a proxy. Finally, we apply the method to EHR data to estimate the effect of hospital admission for older adults presenting to the emergency department with chest pain, a setting where unmeasured confounding is a substantial concern. This work provides a practical way to use proxies and may help bring proxy-based methods into broader use.

stat.ME