arXiv subjects

Anannya Upasana

Publications and source records attributed to Anannya Upasana.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Fixed Budget vs. Covering Target: The Partial Set Cover Boundary for Bounded VC-Dimension

Maximum Coverage and Partial Set Cover are fundamental parameterized covering problems. The former fixes a budget $k$ and maximizes coverage; the latter meets a target with as few sets as possible. Badanidiyuru, Kleinberg, and Lee (SoCG 2012) give an EPAS for the former on bounded-VC set systems, while Jain et al. (SODA 2023) show that on $K_{d,d}$-free incidence graphs, $k+1$ sets suffice whenever $k$ sets meet the target. We ask whether this guarantee extends to all bounded-VC set systems. Our first result is negative. Unless FPT = W[1], Partial Set Cover admits no parameterized $(2-δ)$-approximation even at VC-dimension seven. Under ETH, it has no parameterized approximation scheme there and no $2^{o(d)}$-approximation at VC-dimension $d$. On the positive side, bounded semi-ladder index restores this guarantee. It is stronger than bounded VC-dimension but strictly generalizes the $K_{d,d}$-free setting. For Weighted Partial Set Cover, if $k$ sets cover weight $W$, we find $k+1$ sets covering weight $W$ in $2^{O(Γk\log k)}N$ time, where $Γ$ is the downward intersection complexity and $N$ is the input size. The framework supports per-class targets and matroid independence, with applications to partial dominating set and geometric and bounded-size covering. Finally, we give a deterministic FPT reduction from Weighted CC-MaxSAT to a bounded family of Weighted Maximum Coverage instances, preserving incidence structure and approximation schemes with constant-factor accuracy loss. This gives an EPAS at bounded semi-ladder index. We improve the deterministic BKL bounded-VC implementation; combined with our reduction, it yields a $2^{\widetilde{O}(kd/\varepsilon)}N^{O(1)}$-time EPAS for bounded-VC Weighted CC-MaxSAT.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Dominating Set with Quotas: Balancing Coverage and Constraints

We study a natural generalization of the classical \textsc{Dominating Set} problem, called \textsc{Dominating Set with Quotas} (DSQ). In this problem, we are given a graph $ G $, an integer $ k $, and for each vertex $ v \in V(G) $, a lower quota $ \mathrm{lo}_v $ and an upper quota $ \mathrm{up}_v $. The goal is to determine whether there exists a set $ S \subseteq V(G) $ of size at most $ k $ such that for every vertex $ v \in V(G) $, the number of vertices in its closed neighborhood that belong to $ S $, i.e., $ |N[v] \cap S| $, lies within the range $ [\mathrm{lo}_v, \mathrm{up}_v] $. This richer model captures a variety of practical settings where both under- and over-coverage must be avoided -- such as in fault-tolerant infrastructure, load-balanced facility placement, or constrained communication networks. While DS is already known to be computationally hard, we show that the added expressiveness of per-vertex quotas in DSQ introduces additional algorithmic challenges. In particular, we prove that DSQ becomes \W[1]-hard even on structurally sparse graphs -- such as those with degeneracy 2, or excluding $ K_{3,3} $ as a subgraph -- despite these classes admitting FPT algorithms for DS. On the positive side, we show that DSQ is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by solution size and treewidth, and more generally, on nowhere dense graph classes. Furthermore, we design a subexponential-time algorithm for DSQ on apex-minor-free graphs using the bidimensionality framework. These results collectively offer a refined view of the algorithmic landscape of DSQ, revealing a sharp contrast with the classical DS problem and identifying the key structural properties that govern tractability.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Line Cover and Related Problems

We study extensions of the classic \emph{Line Cover} problem, which asks whether a set of $n$ points in the plane can be covered using $k$ lines. Line Cover is known to be NP-hard, and we focus on two natural generalizations. The first is \textbf{Line Clustering}, where the goal is to find $k$ lines minimizing the sum of squared distances from the input points to their nearest line. The second is \textbf{Hyperplane Cover}, which asks whether $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ can be covered by $k$ hyperplanes. We also study the more general \textbf{Projective Clustering} problem, which unifies both settings and has applications in machine learning, data analysis, and computational geometry. In this problem, one seeks $k$ affine subspaces of dimension $r$ that minimize the sum of squared distances from the given points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ to the nearest subspace. Our results reveal notable differences in the parameterized complexity of these problems. While Line Cover is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $k$, we show that Line Clustering is W[1]-hard with respect to $k$ and does not admit an algorithm with running time $n^{o(k)}$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. Hyperplane Cover has been known to be NP-hard since the 1980s, following work of Megiddo and Tamir, even for $d=2$, we show that it remains NP-hard even when $k=2$. Finally, we present an algorithm for Projective Clustering running in $n^{O(dk(r+1))}$ time. This bound matches our lower bound for Line Clustering and generalizes the classic algorithm for $k$-Means Clustering ($r=0$) by Inaba, Katoh, and Imai [SoCG 1994].

cs.CG↗

arXiv2025

More Efforts Towards Fixed-Parameter Approximability of Multiwinner Rules

Multiwinner Elections have emerged as a prominent area of research with numerous practical applications. We contribute to this area by designing parameterized approximation algorithms and also resolving an open question by Yang and Wang [AAMAS'18]. More formally, given a set of candidates, \mathcal{C}, a set of voters,\mathcal{V}, approving a subset of candidates (called approval set of a voter), and an integer $k$, we consider the problem of selecting a ``good'' committee using Thiele rules. This problem is computationally challenging for most Thiele rules with monotone submodular satisfaction functions, as there is no (1-\frac{1}{e}-ε)\footnote{Here, $e$ denotes the base of the natural logarithm.}-approximation algorithm in f(k)(|\mathcal{C}| + |\mathcal{V}|)^{o(k)} time for any fixed $ε> 0$ and any computable function $f$, and no {\sf PTAS} even when the length of approval set is two. Skowron [WINE'16] designed an approximation scheme running in FPT time parameterized by the combined parameter, size of the approval set and $k$. In this paper, we consider a parameter $d+k$ (no $d$ voters approve the same set of $d$ candidates), where $d$ is upper bounded by the size of the approval set (thus, can be much smaller). With respect to this parameter, we design parameterized approximation schemes, a lossy polynomial-time preprocessing method, and show that an extra committee member suffices to achieve the desired score (i.e., $1$-additive approximation). Additionally, we resolve an open question by Yang and Wang~[AAMAS'18] regarding the fixed-parameter tractability of the problem under the PAV rule with the total score as the parameter, demonstrating that it admits an FPT algorithm.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Satisfiability to Coverage in Presence of Fairness, Matroid, and Global Constraints

In MaxSAT with Cardinality Constraint problem (CC-MaxSAT), we are given a CNF-formula $Φ$, and $k \ge 0$, and the goal is to find an assignment $β$ with at most $k$ variables set to true (also called a weight $k$-assignment) such that the number of clauses satisfied by $β$ is maximized. MaxCov can be seen as a special case of CC-MaxSAT, where the formula $Φ$ is monotone, i.e., does not contain any negative literals. CC-MaxSAT and MaxCov are extremely well-studied problems in the approximation algorithms as well as parameterized complexity literature. Our first contribution is that the two problems are equivalent to each other in the context of FPT-Approximation parameterized by $k$ (approximation is in terms of number of clauses satisfied/elements covered). We give a randomized reduction from CC-MaxSAT to MaxCov in time $O(1/ε)^{k} \cdot (m+n)^{O(1)}$ that preserves the approximation guarantee up to a factor of $1-ε$. Furthermore, this reduction also works in the presence of fairness and matroid constraints. Armed with this reduction, we focus on designing FPT-Approximation schemes (FPT-ASes) for MaxCov and its generalizations. Our algorithms are based on a novel combination of a variety of ideas, including a carefully designed probability distribution that exploits sparse coverage functions. These algorithms substantially generalize the results in Jain et al. [SODA 2023] for CC-MaxSAT and MaxCov for $K_{d,d}$-free set systems (i.e., no $d$ sets share $d$ elements), as well as a recent FPT-AS for Matroid-Constrained MaxCov by Sellier [ESA 2023] for frequency-$d$ set systems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Even the Easiest(?) Graph Coloring Problem is not Easy in Streaming!

We study a graph coloring problem that is otherwise easy but becomes quite non-trivial in the one-pass streaming model. In contrast to previous graph coloring problems in streaming that try to find an assignment of colors to vertices, our main work is on estimating the number of conflicting or monochromatic edges given a coloring function that is streaming along with the graph; we call the problem {\sc Conflict-Est}. The coloring function on a vertex can be read or accessed only when the vertex is revealed in the stream. If we need the color on a vertex that has streamed past, then that color, along with its vertex, has to be stored explicitly. We provide algorithms for a graph that is streaming in different variants of the one-pass vertex arrival streaming model, viz. the {\sc Vertex Arrival} ({\sc VA}), {Vertex Arrival With Degree Oracle} ({\sc VAdeg}), {\sc Vertex Arrival in Random Order} ({\sc VArand}) models, with special focus on the random order model. We also provide matching lower bounds for most of the cases. The mainstay of our work is in showing that the properties of a random order stream can be exploited to design streaming algorithms for estimating the number of conflicting edges. We have also obtained a lower bound, though not matching the upper bound, for the random order model. Among all the three models vis-a-vis this problem, we can show a clear separation of power in favor of the {\sc VArand} model.

cs.DS↗