Anass Bouisaghouane | Searcharxiv

arXiv2017

The Kontsevich tetrahedral flow revisited

We prove that the Kontsevich tetrahedral flow $\dot{\mathcal{P}} = \mathcal{Q}_{a:b} (\mathcal{P})$, the right-hand side of which is a linear combination of two differential monomials of degree four in a bi-vector $\mathcal{P}$ on an affine real Poisson manifold $N^n$, does infinitesimally preserve the space of Poisson bi-vectors on $N^n$ if and only if the two monomials in $\mathcal{Q}_{a:b} (\mathcal{P})$ are balanced by the ratio $a:b=1:6$. The proof is explicit; it is written in the language of Kontsevich graphs.

math.QA↗

arXiv2017

The Kontsevich tetrahedral flow in 2D: a toy model

In the paper "Formality conjecture" (1996) Kontsevich designed a universal flow $\dot{\mathcal{P}}=\mathcal{Q}_{a:b}(\mathcal{P})=aΓ_{1}+bΓ_{2}$ on the spaces of Poisson structures $\mathcal{P}$ on all affine manifolds of dimension $n \geqslant 2$. We prove a claim from $\textit{loc. cit.}$ stating that if $n=2$, the flow $\mathcal{Q}_{1:0}=Γ_{1}(\mathcal{P})$ is Poisson-cohomology trivial: $Γ_{1}(\mathcal{P})$ is the Schouten bracket of $\mathcal{P}$ with $\mathcal{X}$, for some vector field $\mathcal{X}$; we examine the structure of the space of solutions $\mathcal{X}$. Both the construction of differential polynomials $Γ_{1}(\mathcal{P})$ and $Γ_{2}(\mathcal{P})$ and the technique to study them remain valid in higher dimensions $n \geqslant 3$, but neither the trivializing vector field $\mathcal{X}$ nor the setting $b:=0$ survive at $n\geqslant 3$, where the balance is $a:b=1:6$.

math.DG↗

arXiv2016

Do the Kontsevich tetrahedral flows preserve or destroy the space of Poisson bi-vectors?

From the paper "Formality Conjecture" (Ascona 1996): "I am aware of only one such a class, it corresponds to simplest good graph, the complete graph with $4$ vertices $($and $6$ edges$)$. This class gives a remarkable vector field on the space of bi-vector fields on $\mathbb{R}^{d}$. The evolution with respect to the time $t$ is described by the following non-linear partial differential equation: ..., where $α=\sum_{i,j}α_{ij} {\partial}/{\partial x_{i}}\wedge {\partial}/{\partial x_{j}}$ is a bi-vector field on $\mathbb{R}^d$. It follows from general properties of cohomology that $1)$ this evolution preserves the class of $($real-analytic$)$ Poisson structures}, ... In fact, I cheated a little bit. In the formula for the vector field on the space of bivector fields which one get from the tetrahedron graph, an additional term is present. ... It is possible to prove formally that if $α$ is a Poisson bracket, i.e. if $[{α,α}]=0\in T^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$, then the additional term shown above vanishes." By using twelve Poisson structures with high-degree polynomial coefficients as explicit counterexamples, we show that both the above claims are false: neither does the first flow preserve the property of bi-vectors to be Poisson nor does the second flow vanish identically at Poisson bi-vectors. The counterexamples at hand suggest a correction to the formula for the "exotic" flow on the space of Poisson bi-vectors; in fact, this flow is encoded by the balanced sum involving both the Kontsevich tetrahedral graphs (that give rise to the flows mentioned above). We reveal that it is only the balance $1:6$ for which the flow does preserve the space of Poisson bi-vectors.

math.QA↗