Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

André C. M. Ran

Publications and source records attributed to André C. M. Ran.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2023

Synchronization of Power Systems under Stochastic Disturbances

The synchronization of power generators is an important condition for the proper functioning of a power system, in which the fluctuations in frequency and the phase angle differences between the generators are sufficiently small when subjected to stochastic disturbances. Serious fluctuations can prompt desynchronization, which may lead to widespread power outages. Here, we model the stochastic disturbance by a Brownian motion process in the linearized system of the non-linear power systems and characterize the fluctuations by the variances of the frequency and the phase angle differences in the invariant probability distribution. We propose a method to calculate the variances of the frequency and the phase angle differences. For the system with uniform disturbance-damping ratio, we derive explicit formulas for the variance matrices of the frequency and the phase angle differences. It is shown that the fluctuation of the frequency at a node depends on the disturbance-damping ratio and the inertia at this node only, and the fluctuations of the phase angle differences in the lines are independent of the inertia. In particular, the synchronization stability is related to the cycle space of the network. We reveal the influences of constructing new lines and increasing capacities of lines on the fluctuations in the phase angle differences in the existing lines. The results are illustrated for the transmission system of Shandong Province of China. For the system with non-uniform disturbance-damping ratio, we further obtain bounds of the variance matrices.

eess.SY↗
arXiv2015

Equivalence after extension for compact operators on Banach spaces

In recent years the coincidence of the operator relations equivalence after extension and Schur coupling was settled for the Hilbert space case, by showing that equivalence after extension implies equivalence after one-sided extension. In this paper we investigate consequences of equivalence after extension for compact Banach space operators. We show that generating the same operator ideal is necessary but not sufficient for two compact operators to be equivalent after extension. In analogy with the necessary and sufficient conditions on the singular values for compact Hilbert space operators that are equivalent after extension, we prove the necessity of similar relationships between the $s$-numbers of two compact Banach space operators that are equivalent after extension, for arbitrary $s$-functions. We investigate equivalence after extension for operators on $\ell^{p}$-spaces. We show that two operators that act on different $\ell^{p}$-spaces cannot be equivalent after one-sided extension. Such operators can still be equivalent after extension, for instance all invertible operators are equivalent after extension, however, if one of the two operators is compact, then they cannot be equivalent after extension. This contrasts the Hilbert space case where equivalence after one-sided extension and equivalence after extension are, in fact, identical relations. Finally, for general Banach spaces $X$ and $Y$, we investigate consequences of an operator on $X$ being equivalent after extension to a compact operator on $Y$. We show that, in this case, a closed finite codimensional subspace of $Y$ must embed into $X$, and that certain general Banach space properties must transfer from $X$ to $Y$. We also show that no operator on $X$ can be equivalent after extension to an operator on $Y$, if $X$ and $Y$ are essentially incomparable Banach spaces.

math.FA↗
arXiv2010

Local Definitizability of $T^{[*]}T$ and $TT^{[*]}$

The spectral properties of two products $AB$ and $BA$ of possibly unbounded operators $A$ and $B$ in a Banach space are considered. The results are applied in the comparison of local spectral properties of the operators $T^{[*]} T$ and $TT^{[*]} $ in a Krein space. It is shown that under the assumption that both operators $T^{[*]} T$ and $T^{[*]} $ have non-empty resolvent sets, the operator $T^{[*]} T$ is locally definitizable if and only if $TT^{[*]} $ is. In this context the critical points of both operators are compared.

math.SP↗