Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

André H. Hoang

Publications and source records attributed to André H. Hoang.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

C-parameter Distribution at N${}^3$LL$^\prime$ including Power Corrections

We compute the $e^+ e^-$ C-parameter distribution using the Soft-Collinear Effective Theory with a resummation to N${}^3$LL$^\prime$ accuracy of the most singular partonic terms. This includes the known fixed-order QCD results up to ${\cal O} (α_s^3)$, a numerical determination of the two loop non-logarithmic term of the soft function, and all logarithmic terms in the jet and soft functions up to three loops. Our result holds for $C$ in the peak, tail, and far tail regions. Additionally, we treat hadronization effects using a field theoretic nonperturbative soft function, with moments $Ω_n$. In order to eliminate an ${\cal O} (Λ_{\rm QCD})$ renormalon ambiguity in the soft function, we switch from the $\overline {\rm MS}$ to a short distance "Rgap" scheme to define the leading power correction parameter $Ω_1$. We show how to simultaneously account for running effects in $Ω_1$ due to renormalon subtractions and hadron mass effects, enabling power correction universality between C-parameter and thrust to be tested in our setup. We discuss in detail the impact of resummation and renormalon subtractions on the convergence. In the relevant fit region for $α_s(m_Z)$ and $Ω_1$, the perturbative uncertainty in our cross section is $\simeq 3\%$ at $Q=m_Z$.

hep-ph↗

The Top Mass: Interpretation and Theoretical Uncertainties

Currently the most precise LHC measurements of the top quark mass are determinations of the top quark mass parameter of Monte-Carlo (MC) event generators reaching uncertainties of well below $1$ GeV. However, there is an additional theoretical problem when using the MC top mass $m_t^{\rm MC}$ as an input for theoretical predictions, because a rigorous relation of $m_t^{\rm MC}$ to a renormalized field theory mass is, at the very strict level, absent. In this talk I show how - nevertheless - some concrete statements on $m_t^{\rm MC}$ can be deduced assuming that the MC generator behaves like a rigorous first principles QCD calculator for the observables that are used for the analyses. I give simple conceptual arguments showing that in this context $m_t^{\rm MC}$ can be interpreted like the mass of a heavy-light top meson, and that there is a conversion relation to field theory top quark masses that requires a non-perturbative input. The situation is in analogy to B physics where a similar relation exists between experimental B meson masses and field theory bottom masses. The relation gives a prescription how to use $m_t^{\rm MC}$ as an input for theoretical predictions in perturbative QCD. The outcome is that at this time an additional uncertainty of about $1$ GeV has to be accounted for. I discuss limitations of the arguments I give and possible ways to test them, or even to improve the current situation.

hep-ph↗