SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Andrea Lo Sasso

Publications and source records attributed to Andrea Lo Sasso.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Shannon entropy and complex network community detection to study electoral coalition behaviour at municipal scale

Traditional electoral analyses often rely on aggregate sociopolitical indicators or on macroscopic models grounded in statistical physics that treat election data at national level; however, these models have rarely been applied to local-level voting data, where the analytical complexity is substantially higher. In this study, we propose a framework rooted in statistical physics and complex network theory to investigate the fine-grained architecture of voting behaviour at the local scale. Leveraging a granular dataset from the 2024 municipal and 2025 regional elections in Bari, Italy, we represent the urban electoral landscape as a complex network, in which polling sections are modelled as nodes connected by links that encode statistically significant correlations based on vote expression. For each coalition participating in the elections, community detection reveals geographically proximal clusters that transcend administrative boundaries. Furthermore, in order to quantify whether a coalition exhibits territorially homogeneous voting behaviour or, instead, is fragmented into distinct voting blocs, we adapt latent-ideology estimation and the information-theoretic Shannon entropy $H$ to the intra-coalition scale. Our results indicate that winning coalitions exhibit significantly higher territorial fragmentation, and these findings suggest that, at the local level, electoral success is not driven by the maintenance of geographically uniform consensus rather than by the capacity to aggregate diverse and non-homogeneous voting blocs. This scalable, data-driven framework moves beyond simple geographic accounting, providing a robust tool for uncovering the structural dynamics of political idea clustering and coalition fragmentation in complex urban environments.

physics.soc-ph

Sampled Datasets Risk Substantial Bias in the Identification of Political Polarization on Social Media

Following recent policy changes by X (Twitter) and other social media platforms, user interaction data has become increasingly difficult to access. These restrictions are impeding robust research pertaining to social and political phenomena online, which is critical due to the profound impact social media platforms may have on our societies. Here, we investigate the reliability of polarization measures obtained from different samples of social media data by studying the structural polarization of the Polish political debate on Twitter over a 24-hour period. First, we show that the political discussion on Twitter is only a small subset of the wider Twitter discussion. Second, we find that large samples can be representative of the whole political discussion on a platform, but small samples consistently fail to accurately reflect the true structure of polarization online. Finally, we demonstrate that keyword-based samples can be representative if keywords are selected with great care, but that poorly selected keywords can result in substantial political bias in the sampled data. Our findings demonstrate that it is not possible to measure polarization in a reliable way with small, sampled datasets, highlighting why the current lack of research data is so problematic, and providing insight into the practical implementation of the European Union's Digital Service Act which aims to improve researchers' access to social media data.

cs.SI