Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Andrea Santos Revilla

Publications and source records attributed to Andrea Santos Revilla.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

NeuralSet: A High-Performing Python Package for Neuro-AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly central to understanding how the brain processes information. However, the integration of neuroscience and modern AI is bottlenecked by a fragmented software ecosystem. Current tools are siloed by recording modality and optimized for small-scale, in-memory workflows, limiting the use of massive, naturalistic datasets. Here, we introduce NeuralSet, a Python framework that efficiently unifies the processing of diverse neural recordings (including fMRI, M/EEG, and spikes) and complex experimental stimuli (such as text, audio, and video). By decoupling experimental metadata from lazy, memory-efficient data extraction, NeuralSet harmonizes standard neuroscientific preprocessing pipelines with pretrained deep learning embeddings. This approach provides a single PyTorch-ready interface that scales seamlessly from local prototyping to high-performance cluster execution. By eliminating manual data wrangling and ensuring full computational provenance, NeuralSet establishes a scalable, unified infrastructure for the next generation of neuro-AI research.

q-bio.NC↗

ProsAudit, a prosodic benchmark for self-supervised speech models

We present ProsAudit, a benchmark in English to assess structural prosodic knowledge in self-supervised learning (SSL) speech models. It consists of two subtasks, their corresponding metrics, and an evaluation dataset. In the protosyntax task, the model must correctly identify strong versus weak prosodic boundaries. In the lexical task, the model needs to correctly distinguish between pauses inserted between words and within words. We also provide human evaluation scores on this benchmark. We evaluated a series of SSL models and found that they were all able to perform above chance on both tasks, even when evaluated on an unseen language. However, non-native models performed significantly worse than native ones on the lexical task, highlighting the importance of lexical knowledge in this task. We also found a clear effect of size with models trained on more data performing better in the two subtasks.

cs.CL↗