arXiv subjects

Andreas Bärtschi

Publications and source records attributed to Andreas Bärtschi.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2023

JuliQAOA: Fast, Flexible QAOA Simulation

We introduce JuliQAOA, a simulation package specifically built for the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA). JuliQAOA does not require a circuit-level description of QAOA problems, or another package to simulate such circuits, instead relying on a more direct linear algebra implementation. This allows for increased QAOA-specific performance improvements, as well as improved flexibility and generality. JuliQAOA is the first QAOA package designed to aid in the study of both constrained and unconstrained combinatorial optimization problems, and can easily include novel cost functions, mixer Hamiltonians, and other variations. JuliQAOA also includes robust and extensible methods for learning optimal angles. Written in the Julia language, JuliQAOA outperforms existing QAOA software packages and scales well to HPC-level resources. JuliQAOA is available at https://github.com/lanl/JuliQAOA.jl.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Provable bounds for noise-free expectation values computed from noisy samples

In this paper, we explore the impact of noise on quantum computing, particularly focusing on the challenges when sampling bit strings from noisy quantum computers as well as the implications for optimization and machine learning applications. We formally quantify the sampling overhead to extract good samples from noisy quantum computers and relate it to the layer fidelity, a metric to determine the performance of noisy quantum processors. Further, we show how this allows us to use the Conditional Value at Risk of noisy samples to determine provable bounds on noise-free expectation values. We discuss how to leverage these bounds for different algorithms and demonstrate our findings through experiments on a real quantum computer involving up to 127 qubits. The results show a strong alignment with theoretical predictions.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Predicting Expressibility of Parameterized Quantum Circuits using Graph Neural Network

Parameterized Quantum Circuits (PQCs) are essential to quantum machine learning and optimization algorithms. The expressibility of PQCs, which measures their ability to represent a wide range of quantum states, is a critical factor influencing their efficacy in solving quantum problems. However, the existing technique for computing expressibility relies on statistically estimating it through classical simulations, which requires many samples. In this work, we propose a novel method based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for predicting the expressibility of PQCs. By leveraging the graph-based representation of PQCs, our GNN-based model captures intricate relationships between circuit parameters and their resulting expressibility. We train the GNN model on a comprehensive dataset of PQCs annotated with their expressibility values. Experimental evaluation on a four thousand random PQC dataset and IBM Qiskit's hardware efficient ansatz sets demonstrates the superior performance of our approach, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.03 and 0.06, respectively.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Quantum Volume in Practice: What Users Can Expect from NISQ Devices

Quantum volume (QV) has become the de-facto standard benchmark to quantify the capability of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. While QV values are often reported by NISQ providers for their systems, we perform our own series of QV calculations on 24 NISQ devices currently offered by IBM Q, IonQ, Rigetti, Oxford Quantum Circuits, and Quantinuum (formerly Honeywell). Our approach characterizes the performances that an advanced user of these NISQ devices can expect to achieve with a reasonable amount of optimization, but without white-box access to the device. In particular, we compile QV circuits to standard gate sets of the vendor using compiler optimization routines where available, and we perform experiments across different qubit subsets. We find that running QV tests requires very significant compilation cycles, QV values achieved in our tests typically lag behind officially reported results and also depend significantly on the classical compilation effort invested.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

High-Round QAOA for MAX $k$-SAT on Trapped Ion NISQ Devices

The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) is a hybrid classical-quantum algorithm that aims to sample the optimal solution(s) of discrete combinatorial optimization problems. We present optimized QAOA circuit constructions for sampling MAX $k$-SAT problems, specifically for $k=3$ and $k=4$. The novel $4$-SAT QAOA circuit construction we present uses measurement based uncomputation, followed by classical feed forward conditional operations. The QAOA circuit parameters for $3$-SAT are optimized via exact classical (noise-free) simulation, using HPC resources to simulate up to $20$ rounds on $10$ qubits. In order to explore the limits of current NISQ devices we execute these optimized QAOA circuits for random $3$-SAT test instances with clause-to-variable ratio $4$ on four trapped ion quantum computers: Quantinuum H1-1 (20 qubits), IonQ Harmony (11 qubits), IonQ Aria 1 (25 qubits), and IonQ Forte (30 qubits). The QAOA circuits that are executed include $n=10$ up to $p=20$, and $n=22$ for $p=1$ and $p=2$. The high round circuits use upwards of 9,000 individual gate instructions, making these some of the largest QAOA circuits executed on NISQ devices. Our main finding is that current NISQ devices perform best at low round counts (i.e., $p = 1,\ldots, 5$) and then -- as expected due to noise -- gradually start returning satisfiability truth assignments that are no better than randomly picked solutions as the number of QAOA rounds are further increased.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Numerical Evidence for Exponential Speed-up of QAOA over Unstructured Search for Approximate Constrained Optimization

Despite much recent work, the true promise and limitations of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) are unclear. A critical question regarding QAOA is to what extent its performance scales with the input size of the problem instance, in particular the necessary growth in the number of QAOA rounds to reach a high approximation ratio. We present numerical evidence for an exponential speed-up of QAOA over Grover-style unstructured search in finding approximate solutions to constrained optimization problems. Our result provides a strong hint that QAOA is able to exploit the structure of an optimization problem and thus overcome the lower bound for unstructured search. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive numerical study on several Hamming-weight constrained optimization problems for which we include combinations of all standardly studied mixer and phase separator Hamiltonians (Ring mixer, Clique mixer, Objective Value phase separator) as well as quantum minimum-finding inspired Hamiltonians (Grover mixer, Threshold-based phase separator). We identify Clique-Objective-QAOA with an exponential speed-up over Grover-Threshold-QAOA and tie the latter's scaling to that of unstructured search, with all other QAOA combinations coming in at a distant third. Our result suggests that maximizing QAOA performance requires a judicious choice of mixer and phase separator, and should trigger further research into other QAOA variations.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Quantum Annealing vs. QAOA: 127 Qubit Higher-Order Ising Problems on NISQ Computers

Quantum annealing (QA) and Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) are both heuristic quantum algorithms intended for sampling optimal solutions of combinatorial optimization problems. In this article we implement a rigorous direct comparison between QA on D-Wave hardware and QAOA on IBMQ hardware. These two quantum algorithms are also compared against classical simulated annealing. The studied problems are instances of a class of Ising models, with variable assignments of $+1$ or $-1$, that contain cubic $ZZZ$ interactions (higher order terms) and match both the native connectivity of the Pegasus topology D-Wave chips and the heavy hexagonal lattice of the IBMQ chips. The novel QAOA implementation on the heavy hexagonal lattice has a CNOT depth of $6$ per round and allows for usage of an entire heavy hexagonal lattice. Experimentally, QAOA is executed on an ensemble of randomly generated Ising instances with a grid search over $1$ and $2$ round angles using all 127 programmable superconducting transmon qubits of ibm_washington. The error suppression technique digital dynamical decoupling is also tested on all QAOA circuits. QA is executed on the same Ising instances with the programmable superconducting flux qubit devices D-Wave Advantage_system4.1 and Advantage_system6.1 using modified annealing schedules with pauses. We find that QA outperforms QAOA on all problem instances. We also find that dynamical decoupling enables 2-round QAOA to marginally outperform 1-round QAOA, which is not the case without dynamical decoupling.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

The Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz for Satisfiability Problems

We comparatively study, through large-scale numerical simulation, the performance across a large set of Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) implementations for finding approximate and optimum solutions to unconstrained combinatorial optimization problems. Our survey includes over 100 different mixing unitaries, and we combine each mixer with both the standard phase separator unitary representing the objective function and a thresholded version. Our numerical tests for randomly chosen instances of the unconstrained optimization problems Max 2-SAT and Max 3-SAT reveal that the traditional transverse-field mixer with the standard phase separator performs best for problem sizes of 8 through 14 variables, while the recently introduced Grover mixer with thresholding wins at problems of size 6. This result (i) corrects earlier work suggesting that the Grover mixer is a superior mixer based only on results from problems of size 6, thus illustrating the need to push numerical simulation to larger problem sizes to more accurately predict performance; and (ii) it suggests that more complicated mixers and phase separators may not improve QAOA performance.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Optimized Telecloning Circuits: Theory and Practice of Nine NISQ Clones

Although perfect copying of an unknown quantum state is not possible, approximate cloning is possible in quantum mechanics. Quantum telecloning is a variant of approximate quantum cloning which uses quantum teleportation to allow for the use of classical communication to create physically separate clones of a quantum state. We present results of a of $1 \rightarrow 9$ universal, symmetric, optimal quantum telecloning implementation on a cloud accessible quantum computer - the Quantinuum H1-1 device. The H1-1 device allows direct creation of the telecloning protocol due to real time classical if-statements that are conditional on the mid-circuit measurement outcome of a Bell measurement. In this implementation, we also provide an improvement over previous work for the circuit model description of quantum telecloning, which reduces the required gate depth and gate count for an all-to-all connectivity. The demonstration of creating $9$ approximate clones on a quantum processor is the largest number of clones that has been generated, telecloning or otherwise.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Signatures of Open and Noisy Quantum Systems in Single-Qubit Quantum Annealing

We propose a quantum annealing protocol that more effectively probes the dynamics of a single qubit on D-Wave's quantum annealing hardware. This protocol uses D-Wave's h-gain schedule functionality, which allows the rapid quenching of the longitudinal magnetic field at arbitrary points during the anneal. This features enables us to distinguish between open and closed system dynamics as well as the presence or absence of longitudinal magnetic field noise. We show that both thermal and magnetic field fluctuations are key sources of noise that need to be included in an open quantum system model to reproduce the output statistics of the hardware.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Quantum Telecloning on NISQ Computers

Due to the no-cloning theorem, generating perfect quantum clones of an arbitrary unknown quantum state is not possible, however approximate quantum clones can be constructed. Quantum telecloning is a protocol that originates from a combination of quantum teleportation and quantum cloning. Here we present $1 \rightarrow 2$ and $1 \rightarrow 3$ quantum telecloning circuits, with and without ancilla, that are theoretically optimal (meaning the clones have the highest fidelity allowed by quantum mechanics), universal (meaning the clone fidelity is independent of the state being cloned), and symmetric (meaning the clones all have the same fidelity). We implement these circuits on gate model IBMQ and Quantinuum NISQ hardware and quantify the clone fidelities using parallel single qubit state tomography. Quantum telecloning using mid-circuit measurement with classical feed-forward control (i.e. real time if statements) is demonstrated on the Quantinuum H1-2 device. Two alternative implementations of quantum telecloning, deferred measurement and post selection, are demonstrated on ibmq\_montreal, where mid-circuit measurements with real time if statements are not available. Our results show that NISQ devices can achieve near-optimal quantum telecloning fidelity; for example the Quantinuum H1-2 device running the telecloning circuits without ancilla achieved a mean clone fidelity of $0.824$ with standard deviation of $0.024$ for two clone circuits and $0.765$ with standard deviation of $0.022$ for three clone circuits. The theoretical fidelity limits are $0.8\overline{3}$ for two clones and $0.\overline{7}$ for three clones. This demonstrates the viability of performing experimental analysis of quantum information networks and quantum cryptography protocols on NISQ computers.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Short-Depth Circuits for Dicke State Preparation

We present short-depth circuits to deterministically prepare any Dicke state |Dn,k>, which is the equal-amplitude superposition of all n-qubit computational basis states with Hamming Weight k. Dicke states are an important class of entangled quantum states with a large variety of applications, and a long history of experimental creation in physical systems. On the other hand, not much is known regarding efficient scalable quantum circuits for Dicke state preparation on realistic quantum computing hardware connectivities. Here we present preparation circuits for Dicke states |Dn,k> with (i) a depth of O(k log(n/k)) for All-to-All connectivity (such as on current ion trap devices); (ii) a depth of O(k sqrt(n/k)) = O(sqrt(nk) for Grid connectivity on grids of size Omega(sqrt(n/s)) x O(sqrt(ns)) with s<=k (such as on current superconducting qubit devices). Both approaches have a total gate count of O(kn), need no ancilla qubits, and generalize to both the preparation and compression of symmetric pure states in which all non-zero amplitudes correspond to states with Hamming weight at most k. Thus our work significantly improves and expands previous state-of-the art circuits which had depth O(n) on a Linear Nearest Neighbor connectivity for arbitrary k (Fundamentals of Computation Theory 2019) and depth O(log n) on All-to-All connectivity for k=1 (Advanced Quantum Technologies 2019).

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Quantum Algorithm Implementations for Beginners

As quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been developing classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review aims to explain the principles of quantum programming, which are quite different from classical programming, with straightforward algebra that makes understanding of the underlying fascinating quantum mechanical principles optional. We give an introduction to quantum computing algorithms and their implementation on real quantum hardware. We survey 20 different quantum algorithms, attempting to describe each in a succinct and self-contained fashion. We show how these algorithms can be implemented on IBM's quantum computer, and in each case, we discuss the results of the implementation with respect to differences between the simulator and the actual hardware runs. This article introduces computer scientists, physicists, and engineers to quantum algorithms and provides a blueprint for their implementations.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2022

Fair Sampling Error Analysis on NISQ Devices

We study the status of fair sampling on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, in particular the IBM Q family of backends. Using the recently introduced Grover Mixer-QAOA algorithm for discrete optimization, we generate fair sampling circuits to solve six problems of varying difficulty, each with several optimal solutions, which we then run on twenty backends across the IBM Q system. For a given circuit evaluated on a specific set of qubits, we evaluate: how frequently the qubits return an optimal solution to the problem, the fairness with which the qubits sample from all optimal solutions, and the reported hardware error rate of the qubits. To quantify fairness, we define a novel metric based on Pearson's $χ^2$ test. We find that fairness is relatively high for circuits with small and large error rates, but drops for circuits with medium error rates. This indicates that structured errors dominate in this regime, while unstructured errors, which are random and thus inherently fair, dominate in noisier qubits and longer circuits. Our results show that fairness can be a powerful tool for understanding the intricate web of errors affecting current NISQ hardware.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

A Divide-and-Conquer Approach to Dicke State Preparation

We present a divide-and-conquer approach to deterministically prepare Dicke states $\lvert D_k^n\rangle$ (i.e., equal-weight superpositions of all $n$-qubit states with Hamming Weight $k$) on quantum computers. In an experimental evaluation for up to $n=6$ qubits on IBM Quantum Sydney and Montreal devices, we achieve significantly higher state fidelity compared to previous results [Mukherjee and others, TQE'2020], [Cruz and others, QuTe'2019]. The fidelity gains are achieved through several techniques: Our circuits first "divide" the Hamming weight between blocks of $n/2$ qubits, and then "conquer" those blocks with improved versions of Dicke state unitaries [Bärtschi and others, FCT'2019]. Due to the sparse connectivity on IBM's heavy-hex-architectures, these circuits are implemented for linear nearest neighbor topologies. Further gains in (estimating) the state fidelity are due to our use of measurement error mitigation and hardware progress.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Threshold-Based Quantum Optimization

We propose and study Th-QAOA (pronounced Threshold QAOA), a variation of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) that replaces the standard phase separator operator, which encodes the objective function, with a threshold function that returns a value $1$ for solutions with an objective value above the threshold and a $0$ otherwise. We vary the threshold value to arrive at a quantum optimization algorithm. We focus on a combination with the Grover Mixer operator; the resulting GM-Th-QAOA can be viewed as a generalization of Grover's quantum search algorithm and its minimum/maximum finding cousin to approximate optimization. Our main findings include: (i) we provide intuitive arguments and show empirically that the optimum parameter values of GM-Th-QAOA (angles and threshold value) can be found with $O(\log(p) \times \log M)$ iterations of the classical outer loop, where $p$ is the number of QAOA rounds and $M$ is an upper bound on the solution value (often the number of vertices or edges in an input graph), thus eliminating the notorious outer-loop parameter finding issue of other QAOA algorithms; (ii) GM-Th-QAOA can be simulated classically with little effort up to 100 qubits through a set of tricks that cut down memory requirements; (iii) somewhat surprisingly, GM-Th-QAOA outperforms non-thresholded GM-QAOA in terms of approximation ratios achieved. This third result holds across a range of optimization problems (MaxCut, Max k-VertexCover, Max k-DensestSubgraph, MaxBisection) and various experimental design parameters, such as different input edge densities and constraint sizes.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Sampling on NISQ Devices: "Who's the Fairest One of All?"

Modern NISQ devices are subject to a variety of biases and sources of noise that degrade the solution quality of computations carried out on these devices. A natural question that arises in the NISQ era, is how fairly do these devices sample ground state solutions. To this end, we run five fair sampling problems (each with at least three ground state solutions) that are based both on quantum annealing and on the Grover Mixer-QAOA algorithm for gate-based NISQ hardware. In particular, we use seven IBM~Q devices, the Aspen-9 Rigetti device, the IonQ device, and three D-Wave quantum annealers. For each of the fair sampling problems, we measure the ground state probability, the relative fairness of the frequency of each ground state solution with respect to the other ground state solutions, and the aggregate error as given by each hardware provider. Overall, our results show that NISQ devices do not achieve fair sampling yet. We also observe differences in the software stack with a particular focus on compilation techniques that illustrate what work will still need to be done to achieve a seamless integration of frontend (i.e. quantum circuit description) and backend compilation.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2020

Grover Mixers for QAOA: Shifting Complexity from Mixer Design to State Preparation

We propose GM-QAOA, a variation of the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) that uses Grover-like selective phase shift mixing operators. GM-QAOA works on any NP optimization problem for which it is possible to efficiently prepare an equal superposition of all feasible solutions; it is designed to perform particularly well for constraint optimization problems, where not all possible variable assignments are feasible solutions. GM-QAOA has the following features: (i) It is not susceptible to Hamiltonian Simulation error (such as Trotterization errors) as its operators can be implemented exactly using standard gate sets and (ii) Solutions with the same objective value are always sampled with the same amplitude. We illustrate the potential of GM-QAOA on several optimization problem classes: for permutation-based optimization problems such as the Traveling Salesperson Problem, we present an efficient algorithm to prepare a superposition of all possible permutations of $n$ numbers, defined on $O(n^2)$ qubits; for the hard constraint $k$-Vertex-Cover problem, and for an application to Discrete Portfolio Rebalancing, we show that GM-QAOA outperforms existing QAOA approaches.

quant-ph↗