arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Andreas Blass.
This article offers a gentle introduction to the axiom of choice. We introduce the axiom, discuss some common objections to it, and present three kinds of reasons to accept it. Although the exposition is aimed at non-experts in set theory, we also include some lesser-known results.
Recent analysis of classical algorithms resulted in their axiomatization as transition systems satisfying some simple postulates, and in the formulation of the Abstract State Machine Theorem, which assures us that any classical algorithm can be emulated step-by-step by a most general model of computation, called an ``abstract state machine''. We refine that analysis to take details of intra-step behavior into account, and show that there is in fact an abstract state machine that not only has the same state transitions as does a given algorithm but also performs the exact same tests on states when determining how to proceed to the next state. This enhancement allows the inclusion -- within the abstract-state-machine framework -- of algorithms whose states only have partially-defined equality, or employ other native partial functions, as is the case, for instance, with inversion of a matrix of computable reals.
A hundred years ago, logic was almost synonymous with foundational studies. The ongoing AI revolution raises many deep foundational problems involving neuroscience, philosophy, computer science, and logic. The goal of the following dialog is to provoke young logicians with a taste for foundations to notice the foundational problems raised by the AI revolution.
According to Dirac's bra-ket notation, in an inner-product space, the inner product $\langle x\,|\,y\rangle$ of vectors $x,y$ can be viewed as an application of the bra $\langle x|$ to the ket $|y\rangle$. Here $\langle x|$ is the linear functional $|y\rangle \mapsto \langle x\,|\,y\rangle$ and $|y\rangle$ is the vector $y$. But often -- though not always -- there are advantages in seeing $|y\rangle$ as the function $a \mapsto a\cdot y$ where $a$ ranges over the scalars. For example, the outer product $|y\rangle\langle x|$ becomes simply the composition $|y\rangle \circ \langle x|$. It would be most convenient to view kets sometimes as vectors and sometimes as functions, depending on the context. This turns out to be possible. While the bra-ket notation arose in quantum mechanics, this note presupposes no familiarity with quantum mechanics.
We consider several notions of well-foundedness of cardinals in the absence of the Axiom of Choice. Some of these have been conflated by some authors, but we separate them carefully. We then consider implications among these, and also between these and other consequences of Choice. For instance, we show that the Partition Principle implies that all of our versions of well-foundedness are equivalent. We also show that one version, concerning surjections, implies the Dual Cantor-Schr\"oder-Bernstein theorem. It has been conjectured that well-foundedness, in one form or another, actually implies the Axiom of Choice, but this conjecture remains unresolved.
Primal logic arose in access control; it has a remarkably efficient (linear time) decision procedure for its entailment problem. But primal logic is a general logic of information. In the realm of arbitrary items of information (infons), conjunction, disjunction, and implication may seem to correspond (set-theoretically) to union, intersection, and relative complementation. But, while infons are closed under union, they are not closed under intersection or relative complementation. It turns out that there is a systematic transformation of propositional intuitionistic calculi to the original (propositional) primal calculi; we call it Flatting. We extend Flatting to quantifier rules, obtaining arguably the right quantified primal logic, QPL. The QPL entailment problem is exponential-time complete, but it is polynomial-time complete in the case, of importance to applications (at least to access control), where the number of quantifiers is bounded.
We show that, on the abstraction level of quantum circuit diagrams, quantum circuit algorithms belong to the species of interactive sequential algorithms that we studied in earlier work. This observation leads to a natural specification language for quantum circuit algorithms.
We establish the following input independence principle. If a quantum circuit $\mathcal C$ computes a unitary transformation $U_μ$ along a computation path $μ$, then the probability that computation of $\mathcal C$ follows path $μ$ is independent of the input.
An observation space $\mathcal S$ is a family of probability distributions $\langle P_i: i\in I \rangle$ sharing a common sample space $Ω$ in a consistent way. A \emph{grounding} for $\mathcal S$ is a signed probability distribution $\mathcal P$ on $Ω$ yielding the correct marginal distribution $P_i$ for every $i$. A wide variety of quantum scenarios can be formalized as observation spaces. We describe all groundings for a number of quantum observation spaces. Our main technical result is a rigorous proof that Wigner's distribution is the unique signed probability distribution yielding the correct marginal distributions for position and momentum and all their linear combinations.
In every state of a quantum particle, Wigner's quasidistribution is the unique quasidistribution on the phase space with the correct marginal distributions for position, momentum, and all their linear combinations.
We construct reversible Boolean circuits efficiently simulating reversible Turing machines. Both the circuits and the simulation proof are rather simple. Then we give a fairly straightforward generalization of the circuits and the simulation proof to the quantum case.
We define syntax and semantics of quantum circuits, allowing measurement gates and classical channels. We define circuit-based quantum algorithms and prove that, semantically, any such algorithm is equivalent to a single measurement that depends only on the underlying quantum circuit. Finally, we use our formalization of quantum circuits to state precisely and prove the principle of deferred measurements.
Our primary purpose is to isolate the abstract, mathematical properties of circuits -- both classical Boolean circuits and quantum circuits -- that are essential for their computational interpretation. A secondary purpose is to clarify the similarities and differences between the classical and quantum situations. The general philosophy in this note is to include the mathematically essential aspects of circuits but to omit any of the additional structures that are usually included for convenience. We shall, however, retain the assumption that circuits are finite; this assumption does no harm to the applicability of our approach and is necessary for some of our work.
In category-theoretic models for the anyon systems proposed for topological quantum computing, the essential ingredients are two monoidal structures, $\oplus$ and $\otimes$. The former is symmetric but the latter is only braided, and $\otimes$ is required to distribute over $\oplus$. What are the appropriate coherence conditions for the distributivity isomorphisms? We came to this question working on a simplification of the category-theoretical foundation of topological quantum computing, which is the intended application of the research reported here. This question was answered by Laplaza when both monoidal structures are symmetric, but topological quantum computation depends crucially on $\otimes$ being only braided, not symmetric. We propose coherence conditions for distributivity in this situation, and we prove that our conditions are (a) strong enough to imply Laplaza's when the latter are suitably formulated, and (b) weak enough to hold when --- as in the categories used to model anyons --- the additive structure is that of an abelian category and the braided $\otimes$ is additive. Working on these results, we found a new redundancy in Laplaza's conditions.
In mathematical applications, category theory remains a contentious issue, with enthusiastic fans and a skeptical majority. In a muted form this split applies to the authors of this note. When we learned that the only mathematically sound foundation of topological quantum computing in the literature is based on category theory, the skeptical author suggested to "decategorize" the foundation. But we discovered, to our surprise, that category theory (or something like it) is necessary for the purpose, for computational reasons. The goal of this note is to give a high-level explanation of that necessity, which avoids details and which suggests that the case of topological quantum computing is far from unique.
Boolean and quantum circuits have commonalities and differences. To formalize the syntactical commonality we introduce syntactic circuits where the gates are black boxes. Syntactic circuits support various semantics. One semantics is provided by Boolean circuits, another by quantum circuits. Quantum semantics is a generalization of Boolean but, because of entanglement, the generalization is not straightforward. We consider only unitary quantum circuits here.
Following a remark of Lawvere, we explicitly exhibit a particularly elementary bijection between the set T of finite binary trees and the set T^7 of seven-tuples of such trees. "Particularly elementary" means that the application of the bijection to a seven-tuple of trees involves case distinctions only down to a fixed depth (namely four) in the given seven-tuple. We clarify how this and similar bijections are related to the free commutative semiring on one generator X subject to X=1+X^2. Finally, our main theorem is that the existence of particularly elementary bijections can be deduced from the provable existence, in intuitionistic type theory, of any bijections at all.
How many permutations of the natural numbers are needed so that every conditionally convergent series of real numbers can be rearranged to no longer converge to the same sum? We define the \emph{rearrangement number}, a new cardinal characteristic of the continuum, as the answer to this question. We compare the rearrangement number with several natural variants, for example one obtained by requiring the rearranged series to still converge but to a new, finite limit. We also compare the rearrangement number with several well-studied cardinal characteristics of the continuum. We present some new forcing constructions designed to add permutations that rearrange series from the ground model in particular ways, thereby obtaining consistency results going beyond those that follow from comparisons with familiar cardinal characteristics. Finally, we deal briefly with some variants concerning rearrangements by a special sort of permutation and with rearranging some divergent series to become (conditionally) convergent.