SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Andreas Horst

Publications and source records attributed to Andreas Horst.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Bayesian decomposition using Besov priors

In many inverse problems, the unknown is composed of multiple components with different regularities, for example, in imaging problems, where the unknown can have both rough and smooth features. We investigate linear Bayesian inverse problems, where the unknown consists of two components: one smooth and one piecewise constant. We model the unknown as a sum of two components and assign individual priors on each component to impose the assumed behavior. We propose and compare two prior models: (i) a combination of a Haar wavelet-based Besov prior and a smoothing Besov prior, and (ii) a hierarchical Gaussian prior on the gradient coupled with a smoothing Besov prior. To achieve a balanced reconstruction, we place hyperpriors on the prior parameters and jointly infer both the components and the hyperparameters. We propose Gibbs sampling schemes for posterior inference in both prior models. We demonstrate the capabilities of our approach on 1D and 2D deconvolution problems, where the unknown consists of smooth parts with jumps. The numerical results indicate that our methods improve the reconstruction quality compared to single-prior approaches and that the prior parameters can be successfully estimated to yield a balanced decomposition.

stat.CO

Uncertainty Quantification for Linear Inverse Problems with Besov Prior: A Randomize-Then-Optimize Method

In this work, we investigate the use of Besov priors in the context of Bayesian inverse problems. The solution to Bayesian inverse problems is the posterior distribution which naturally enables us to interpret the uncertainties. Besov priors are discretization invariant and can promote sparsity in terms of wavelet coefficients. We propose the randomize-then-optimize method to draw samples from the posterior distribution with Besov priors under a general parameter setting and estimate the modes of the posterior distribution. The performance of the proposed method is studied through numerical experiments of a 1D inpainting problem, a 1D deconvolution problem, and a 2D computed tomography problem. Further, we discuss the influence of the choice of the Besov parameters and the wavelet basis in detail, and we compare the proposed method with the state-of-the-art methods. The numerical results suggest that the proposed method is an effective tool for sampling the posterior distribution equipped with general Besov priors.

math.NA

Besov regularity of random wavelet series

We study the Besov regularity of wavelet series on $\mathbb{R}^d$ with randomly chosen coefficients. More precisely, each coefficient is a product of a random factor and a parameterized deterministic factor (decaying with the scale $j$ and the norm of the shift $m$). Compared to the literature, we impose relatively mild conditions on the moments of the random variables in order to characterize the almost sure convergence of the wavelet series in Besov spaces $B^s_{p,q}(\mathbb{R}^d)$ and the finiteness of the moments as well as of the moment generating function of the Besov norm. In most cases, we achieve a complete characterization, i.e., the derived conditions are both necessary and sufficient.

math.PR

On the non-frame property of Gabor systems with Hermite generators and the frame set conjecture

The frame set conjecture for Hermite functions formulated in [Gr\"ochenig, J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 20(4):865-895, 2014] states that the Gabor frame set for these generators is the largest possible, that is, the time-frequency shifts of the Hermite functions associated with sampling rates $\alpha$ and modulation rates $\beta$ that avoid all known obstructions lead to Gabor frames for $L^{2}(\mathbb{R})$. By results in [Seip and Wallst\'en, J. Reine Angew. Math., 429:107-113, 1992] and [Lemvig, Monatsh. Math., 182(4):899-912, 2017], it is known that the conjecture is true for the Gaussian, the $0$th order Hermite functions, and false for Hermite functions of order $2,3,6,7,10,11,\dots$, respectively. In this paper we disprove the remaining cases except for the $1$st order Hermite function.

math.CA