Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Andreas Kryger Jensen

Publications and source records attributed to Andreas Kryger Jensen.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Gaussian Process Differential Ensembles for Joint Inference on Curves, Derivatives, and Integrals

Functional data are often modeled through one likelihood-linked curve, while the scientific target is a larger state containing rates, accumulated quantities, boundary values, or nonlinear functionals of several linked levels. These targets require more than smoothing the observed curve: derivative uncertainty, cross-level covariance, and integration constants must be handled jointly. We introduce anchored Gaussian process differential ensembles, embedding an anchor \(f_0\) in a joint Gaussian state with its mean-square derivatives and repeated integrals. Integral levels add explicit Gaussian integration constants. This separates the anchor-induced covariance from finite-dimensional boundary uncertainty and clarifies why anchor-only observations do not identify independent integration constants. For stationary one-dimensional kernels, we compute the ensemble with a transformed Hilbert space Gaussian process approximation that applies derivative and integral operators to Laplacian--Dirichlet basis functions while retaining the integration-constant covariance exactly. We establish operator-level approximation bounds and conditional finite-grid posterior convergence. We introduce TARTARE, a target-aware calibration procedure for finite-rank differential ensemble approximations, to address derivative under-resolution by anchor-calibrated bases. In second-order simulations, derivative-aware calibration improves derivative posterior recovery relative to anchor-only calibration while preserving anchor and integral summaries. A motorcycle crash analysis illustrates coherent posterior inference on a coupled kinematic state and short-horizon turning-point functionals.

stat.ME↗

Towards a pretrained deep learning estimator of the Linfoot informational correlation

We develop a supervised deep-learning approach to estimate mutual information between two continuous random variables. As labels, we use the Linfoot informational correlation, a transformation of mutual information that has many important properties. Our method is based on ground truth labels for Gaussian and Clayton copulas. We compare our method with estimators based on kernel density, k-nearest neighbours and neural estimators. We show generally lower bias and lower variance. As a proof of principle, future research could look into training the model with a more diverse set of examples from other copulas for which ground truth labels are available.

stat.ML↗

Computationally efficient multi-level Gaussian process regression for functional data observed under completely or partially regular sampling designs

Gaussian process regression is a frequently used statistical method for flexible yet fully probabilistic non-linear regression modeling. A common obstacle is its computational complexity which scales poorly with the number of observations. This is especially an issue when applying Gaussian process models to multiple functions simultaneously in various applications of functional data analysis. We consider a multi-level Gaussian process regression model where a common mean function and individual subject-specific deviations are modeled simultaneously as latent Gaussian processes. We derive exact analytic and computationally efficient expressions for the log-likelihood function and the posterior distributions in the case where the observations are sampled on either a completely or partially regular grid. This enables us to fit the model to large data sets that are currently computationally inaccessible using a standard implementation. We show through a simulation study that our analytic expressions are several orders of magnitude faster compared to a standard implementation, and we provide an implementation in the probabilistic programming language Stan.

stat.ME↗

Joint Alignment of Multivariate Quasi-Periodic Functional Data Using Deep Learning

The joint alignment of multivariate functional data plays an important role in various fields such as signal processing, neuroscience and medicine, including the statistical analysis of data from wearable devices. Traditional methods often ignore the phase variability and instead focus on the variability in the observed amplitude. We present a novel method for joint alignment of multivariate quasi-periodic functions using deep neural networks, decomposing, but retaining all the information in the data by preserving both phase and amplitude variability. Our proposed neural network uses a special activation of the output that builds on the unit simplex transformation, and we utilize a loss function based on the Fisher-Rao metric to train our model. Furthermore, our method is unsupervised and can provide an optimal common template function as well as subject-specific templates. We demonstrate our method on two simulated datasets and one real example, comprising data from 12-lead 10s electrocardiogram recordings.

eess.SP↗

Sharp symbolic nonparametric bounds for measures of benefit in observational and imperfect randomized studies with ordinal outcomes

The probability of benefit is a valuable and important measure of treatment effect, which has advantages over the average treatment effect. Particularly for an ordinal outcome, it has a better interpretation and can make apparent different aspects of the treatment impact. Unfortunately, this measure, and variations of it, are not identifiable even in randomized trials with perfect compliance. There is, for this reason, a long literature on nonparametric bounds for unidentifiable measures of benefit. These have primarily focused on perfect randomized trial settings and one or two specific estimands. We expand these bounds to observational settings with unmeasured confounders and imperfect randomized trials for all three estimands considered in the literature: the probability of benefit, the probability of no harm, and the relative treatment effect.

stat.ME↗

Having a Ball: evaluating scoring streaks and game excitement using in-match trend estimation

Many popular sports involve matches between two teams or players where each team have the possibility of scoring points throughout the match. While the overall match winner and result is interesting, it conveys little information about the underlying scoring trends throughout the match. Modeling approaches that accommodate a finer granularity of the score difference throughout the match is needed to evaluate in-game strategies, discuss scoring streaks, teams strengths, and other aspects of the game. We propose a latent Gaussian process to model the score difference between two teams and introduce the Trend Direction Index as an easily interpretable probabilistic measure of the current trend in the match as well as a measure of post-game trend evaluation. In addition we propose the Excitement Trend Index - the expected number of monotonicity changes in the running score difference - as a measure of overall game excitement. Our proposed methodology is applied to all 1143 matches from the 2019-2020 National Basketball Association (NBA) season. We show how the trends can be interpreted in individual games and how the excitement score can be used to cluster teams according to how exciting they are to watch.

stat.AP↗

Quantifying the Trendiness of Trends

News media often report that the trend of some public health outcome has changed. These statements are frequently based on longitudinal data, and the change in trend is typically found to have occurred at the most recent data collection time point - if no change had occurred the story is less likely to be reported. Such claims may potentially influence public health decisions on a national level. We propose two measures for quantifying the trendiness of trends. Assuming that reality evolves in continuous time we define what constitutes a trend and a change in trend, and introduce a probabilistic Trend Direction Index. This index has the interpretation of the probability that a latent characteristic has changed monotonicity at any given time conditional on observed data. We also define an index of Expected Trend Instability quantifying the expected number of changes in trend on an interval. Using a latent Gaussian Process model we show how the Trend Direction Index and the Expected Trend Instability can be estimated in a Bayesian framework and use the methods to analyze the proportion of smokers in Denmark during the last 20 years, and the development of new COVID-19 cases in Italy from February 24th onwards.

stat.AP↗

A novel high-power test for continuous outcomes truncated by death

Patient reported outcomes including quality of life (QoL) assessments are increasingly being included as either primary or secondary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. While making the outcomes more relevant for patients it entails a challenge in cases where death or a similar event makes the outcome of interest undefined. A pragmatic - and much used - solution is to assign diseased patient with the lowest possible QoL score. This makes medical sense, but creates a statistical problem since traditional tests such as t-tests or Wilcox tests potentially looses large amounts of statistical power. In this paper we propose a novel test that can keep the medical relevant composite outcome, but preserve full statistical power. The test is also applicable in other situations where a specific value (say 0 days alive outside hospitals) encodes a special meaning. The test is implemented in an R package which is available for download.

stat.ME↗

Sequential rank agreement methods for comparison of ranked lists

The comparison of alternative rankings of a set of items is a general and prominent task in applied statistics. Predictor variables are ranked according to magnitude of association with an outcome, prediction models rank subjects according to the personalized risk of an event, and genetic studies rank genes according to their difference in gene expression levels. This article constructs measures of the agreement of two or more ordered lists. We use the standard deviation of the ranks to define a measure of agreement that both provides an intuitive interpretation and can be applied to any number of lists even if some or all are incomplete or censored. The approach can identify change-points in the agreement of the lists and the sequential changes of agreement as a function of the depth of the lists can be compared graphically to a permutation based reference set. The usefulness of these tools are illustrated using gene rankings, and using data from two Danish ovarian cancer studies where we assess the within and between agreement of different statistical classification methods.

stat.ME↗