arXiv subjects

Andreas Wiese

Publications and source records attributed to Andreas Wiese.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Tight Approximation Algorithms for Two Dimensional Guillotine Strip Packing

In the Strip Packing problem (SP), we are given a vertical half-strip $[0,W]\times[0,\infty)$ and a set of $n$ axis-aligned rectangles of width at most $W$. The goal is to find a non-overlapping packing of all rectangles into the strip such that the height of the packing is minimized. A well-studied and frequently used practical constraint is to allow only those packings that are guillotine separable, i.e., every rectangle in the packing can be obtained by recursively applying a sequence of edge-to-edge axis-parallel cuts (guillotine cuts) that do not intersect any item of the solution. In this paper, we study approximation algorithms for the Guillotine Strip Packing problem (GSP), i.e., the Strip Packing problem where we require additionally that the packing needs to be guillotine separable. This problem generalizes the classical Bin Packing problem and also makespan minimization on identical machines, and thus it is already strongly NP-hard. Moreover, due to a reduction from the Partition problem, it is NP-hard to obtain a polynomial-time $(3/2-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for GSP for any $\varepsilon>0$ (exactly as Strip Packing). We provide a matching polynomial time $(3/2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for GSP. Furthermore, we present a pseudo-polynomial time $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for GSP. This is surprising as it is NP-hard to obtain a $(5/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for (general) Strip Packing in pseudo-polynomial time. Thus, our results essentially settle the approximability of GSP for both the polynomial and the pseudo-polynomial settings.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Approximation Algorithms for ROUND-UFP and ROUND-SAP

We study ROUND-UFP and ROUND-SAP, two generalizations of the classical BIN PACKING problem that correspond to the unsplittable flow problem on a path (UFP) and the storage allocation problem (SAP), respectively. We are given a path with capacities on its edges and a set of tasks where for each task we are given a demand and a subpath. In ROUND-UFP, the goal is to find a packing of all tasks into a minimum number of copies (rounds) of the given path such that for each copy, the total demand of tasks on any edge does not exceed the capacity of the respective edge. In ROUND-SAP, the tasks are considered to be rectangles and the goal is to find a non-overlapping packing of these rectangles into a minimum number of rounds such that all rectangles lie completely below the capacity profile of the edges. We show that in contrast to BIN PACKING, both the problems do not admit an asymptotic polynomial-time approximation scheme (APTAS), even when all edge capacities are equal. However, for this setting, we obtain asymptotic $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximations for both problems. For the general case, we obtain an $O(\log\log n)$-approximation algorithm and an $O(\log\log\frac{1}δ)$-approximation under $(1+δ)$-resource augmentation for both problems. For the intermediate setting of the no bottleneck assumption (i.e., the maximum task demand is at most the minimum edge capacity), we obtain absolute $12$- and asymptotic $(16+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithms for ROUND-UFP and ROUND-SAP, respectively.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

On fully dynamic constant-factor approximation algorithms for clustering problems

Clustering is an important task with applications in many fields of computer science. We study the fully dynamic setting in which we want to maintain good clusters efficiently when input points (from a metric space) can be inserted and deleted. Many clustering problems are $\mathsf{APX}$-hard but admit polynomial time $O(1)$-approximation algorithms. Thus, it is a natural question whether we can maintain $O(1)$-approximate solutions for them in subpolynomial update time, against adaptive and oblivious adversaries. Only a few results are known that give partial answers to this question. There are dynamic algorithms for $k$-center, $k$-means, and $k$-median that maintain constant factor approximations in expected $\tilde{O}(k^{2})$ update time against an oblivious adversary. However, for these problems there are no algorithms known with an update time that is subpolynomial in $k$, and against an adaptive adversary there are even no (non-trivial) dynamic algorithms known at all. In this paper, we complete the picture of the question above for all these clustering problems. 1. We show that there is no fully dynamic $O(1)$-approximation algorithm for any of the classic clustering problems above with an update time in $n^{o(1)}h(k)$ against an adaptive adversary, for an arbitrary function $h$. 2. We give a lower bound of $Ω(k)$ on the update time for each of the above problems, even against an oblivious adversary. 3. We give the first $O(1)$-approximate fully dynamic algorithms for $k$-sum-of-radii and for $k$-sum-of-diameters with expected update time of $\tilde{O}(k^{O(1)})$ against an oblivious adversary. 4. Finally, for $k$-center we present a fully dynamic $(6+ε)$-approximation algorithm with an expected update time of $\tilde{O}(k)$ against an oblivious adversary.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

A PTAS for the horizontal rectangle stabbing problem

We study rectangle stabbing problems in which we are given $n$ axis-aligned rectangles in the plane that we want to stab, i.e., we want to select line segments such that for each given rectangle there is a line segment that intersects two opposite edges of it. In the horizontal rectangle stabbing problem (STABBING), the goal is to find a set of horizontal line segments of minimum total length such that all rectangles are stabbed. In general rectangle stabbing problem, also known as horizontal-vertical stabbing problem (HV-Stabbing), the goal is to find a set of rectilinear (i.e., either vertical or horizontal) line segments of minimum total length such that all rectangles are stabbed. Both variants are NP-hard. Chan, van Dijk, Fleszar, Spoerhase, and Wolff [2018]initiated the study of these problems by providing constant approximation algorithms. Recently, Eisenbrand, Gallato, Svensson, and Venzin [2021] have presented a QPTAS and a polynomial-time 8-approximation algorithm for STABBING but it is was open whether the problem admits a PTAS. In this paper, we obtain a PTAS for STABBING, settling this question. For HV-Stabbing, we obtain a $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation. We also obtain PTASes for special cases of HV-Stabbing: (i) when all rectangles are squares, (ii) when each rectangle's width is at most its height, and (iii) when all rectangles are $δ$-large, i.e., have at least one edge whose length is at least $δ$, while all edge lengths are at most 1. Our result also implies improved approximations for other problems such as generalized minimum Manhattan network.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2021

Fully Dynamic Algorithms for Knapsack Problems with Polylogarithmic Update Time

Knapsack problems are among the most fundamental problems in optimization. In the Multiple Knapsack problem, we are given multiple knapsacks with different capacities and items with values and sizes. The task is to find a subset of items of maximum total value that can be packed into the knapsacks without exceeding the capacities. We investigate this problem and special cases thereof in the context of dynamic algorithms and design data structures that efficiently maintain near-optimal knapsack solutions for dynamically changing input. More precisely, we handle the arrival and departure of individual items or knapsacks during the execution of the algorithm with worst-case update time polylogarithmic in the number of items. As the optimal and any approximate solution may change drastically, we only maintain implicit solutions and support certain queries in polylogarithmic time, such as the packing of an item and the solution value. While dynamic algorithms are well-studied in the context of graph problems, there is hardly any work on packing problems and generally much less on non-graph problems. Given the theoretical interest in knapsack problems and their practical relevance, it is somewhat surprising that Knapsack has not been addressed before in the context of dynamic algorithms and our work bridges this gap.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

A (2+ε)-Approximation Algorithm for Maximum Independent Set of Rectangles

We study the Maximum Independent Set of Rectangles (MISR) problem, where we are given a set of axis-parallel rectangles in the plane and the goal is to select a subset of non-overlapping rectangles of maximum cardinality. In a recent breakthrough, Mitchell [2021] obtained the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for MISR. His algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of 10 and it is based on a dynamic program that intuitively recursively partitions the input plane into special polygons called corner-clipped rectangles (CCRs), without intersecting certain special horizontal line segments called fences. In this paper, we present a $(2+ε)$-approximation algorithm for MISR which is also based on a recursive partitioning scheme. First, we use a partition into a class of axis-parallel polygons with constant complexity each that are more general than CCRs. This allows us to provide an arguably simpler analysis and at the same time already improves the approximation ratio to 6. Then, using a more elaborate charging scheme and a recursive partitioning into general axis-parallel polygons with constant complexity, we improve our approximation ratio to $2+ε$. In particular, we construct a recursive partitioning based on more general fences which can be sequences of up to $O(1/ε)$ line segments each. This partitioning routine and our other new ideas may be useful for future work towards a PTAS for MISR.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2021

Improved Approximation Algorithms for 2-Dimensional Knapsack: Packing into Multiple L-Shapes, Spirals, and More

In the \textsc{2-Dimensional Knapsack} problem (2DK) we are given a square knapsack and a collection of $n$ rectangular items with integer sizes and profits. Our goal is to find the most profitable subset of items that can be packed non-overlappingly into the knapsack. The currently best known polynomial-time approximation factor for 2DK is $17/9+\varepsilon<1.89$ and there is a $(3/2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm if we are allowed to rotate items by 90 degrees~{[}Gálvez et al., FOCS 2017{]}. In this paper, we give $(4/3+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithms in polynomial time for both cases, assuming that all input data are {integers polynomially bounded in $n$}. Gálvez et al.'s algorithm for 2DK partitions the knapsack into a constant number of rectangular regions plus \emph{one} L-shaped region and packs items into those {in a structured way}. We generalize this approach by allowing up to a \emph{constant} number of {\emph{more general}} regions that can have the shape of an L, a U, a Z, a spiral, and more, and therefore obtain an improved approximation ratio. {In particular, we present an algorithm that computes the essentially optimal structured packing into these regions. }

cs.CG↗

arXiv2021

On Guillotine Separable Packings for the Two-dimensional Geometric Knapsack Problem

In two-dimensional geometric knapsack problem, we are given a set of n axis-aligned rectangular items and an axis-aligned square-shaped knapsack. Each item has integral width, integral height and an associated integral profit. The goal is to find a (non-overlapping axis-aligned) packing of a maximum profit subset of rectangles into the knapsack. A well-studied and frequently used constraint in practice is to allow only packings that are guillotine separable, i.e., every rectangle in the packing can be obtained by recursively applying a sequence of edge-to-edge axis-parallel cuts that do not intersect any item of the solution. In this paper we study approximation algorithms for the geometric knapsack problem under guillotine cut constraints. We present polynomial time (1 + ε)-approximation algorithms for the cases with and without allowing rotations by 90 degrees, assuming that all input numeric data are polynomially bounded in n. In comparison, the best-known approximation factor for this setting is 3 + ε [Jansen-Zhang, SODA 2004], even in the cardinality case where all items have the same profit. Our main technical contribution is a structural lemma which shows that any guillotine packing can be converted into another structured guillotine packing with almost the same profit. In this packing, each item is completely contained in one of a constant number of boxes and L-shaped regions, inside which the items are placed by a simple greedy routine. In particular, we provide a clean sufficient condition when such a packing obeys the guillotine cut constraints which might be useful for other settings where these constraints are imposed.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

A $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for preemptive weighted flow time on a single machine

Weighted flow time is a fundamental and very well-studied objective function in scheduling. In this paper, we study the setting of a single machine with preemptions. The input consists of a set of jobs, characterized by their processing times, release times, and weights and we want to compute a (possibly preemptive) schedule for them. The objective is to minimize the sum of the weighted flow times of the jobs, where the flow time of a job is the time between its release date and its completion time. It had been a long-standing open problem to find a polynomial time $O(1)$-approximation algorithm for this setting. In a recent break-through result, Batra, Garg, and Kumar (FOCS 2018) found such an algorithm if the input data are polynomially bounded integers, and Feige, Kulkarni, and Li (SODA 2019) presented a black-box reduction to this setting. The resulting approximation ratio is a (not explicitly stated) constant which is at least $10.000$. In this paper we improve this ratio to $2+\varepsilon$. The algorithm by Batra, Garg, and Kumar (FOCS 2018) reduces the problem to Demand MultiCut on trees and solves the resulting instances via LP-rounding and a dynamic program. Instead, we first reduce the problem to a (different) geometric problem while losing only a factor $1+ε$, and then solve its resulting instances up to a factor of $2+ε$ by a dynamic program. In particular, our reduction ensures certain structural properties, thanks to which we do not need LP-rounding methods. We believe that our result makes substantial progress towards finding a PTAS for weighted flow time on a single machine.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

On the Two-Dimensional Knapsack Problem for Convex Polygons

We study the two-dimensional geometric knapsack problem for convex polygons. Given a set of weighted convex polygons and a square knapsack, the goal is to select the most profitable subset of the given polygons that fits non-overlappingly into the knapsack. We allow to rotate the polygons by arbitrary angles. We present a quasi-polynomial time $O(1)$-approximation algorithm for the general case and a polynomial time $O(1)$-approximation algorithm if all input polygons are triangles, both assuming polynomially bounded integral input data. Also, we give a quasi-polynomial time algorithm that computes a solution of optimal weight under resource augmentation, i.e., we allow to increase the size of the knapsack by a factor of $1+δ$ for some $δ>0$ but compare ourselves with the optimal solution for the original knapsack. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results for two-dimensional geometric knapsack in which the input objects are more general than axis-parallel rectangles or circles and in which the input polygons can be rotated by arbitrary angles.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Additive Approximation Schemes for Load Balancing Problems

In this paper we introduce the concept of additive approximation schemes and apply it to load balancing problems. Additive approximation schemes aim to find a solution with an absolute error in the objective of at most $εh$ for some suitable parameter $h$. In the case that the parameter $h$ provides a lower bound an additive approximation scheme implies a standard multiplicative approximation scheme and can be much stronger when $h \ll$ OPT. On the other hand, when no PTAS exists (or is unlikely to exist), additive approximation schemes can provide a different notion for approximation. We consider the problem of assigning jobs to identical machines with lower and upper bounds for the loads of the machines. This setting generalizes problems like makespan minimization, the Santa Claus problem (on identical machines), and the envy-minimizing Santa Claus problem. For the last problem, in which the objective is to minimize the difference between the maximum and minimum load, the optimal objective value may be zero and hence it is NP-hard to obtain any multiplicative approximation guarantee. For this class of problems we present additive approximation schemes for $h = p_{\max}$, the maximum processing time of the jobs. Our technical contribution is two-fold. First, we introduce a new relaxation based on integrally assigning slots to machines and fractionally assigning jobs to the slots (the slot-MILP). We identify structural properties of (near-)optimal solutions of the slot-MILP, which allow us to solve it efficiently, assuming that there are $O(1)$ different lower and upper bounds on the machine loads (which is the relevant setting for the three problems mentioned above). The second technical contribution is a local-search based algorithm which rounds a solution to the slot-MILP introducing an additive error on the target load intervals of at most $ε\cdot p_{\max}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Breaking symmetries to rescue Sum of Squares in the case of makespan scheduling

The Sum of Squares (\sos{}) hierarchy gives an automatized technique to create a family of increasingly tight convex relaxations for binary programs. There are several problems for which a constant number of rounds of this hierarchy give integrality gaps matching the best known approximation algorithms. For many other problems, however, ad-hoc techniques give better approximation ratios than \sos{} in the worst case, as shown by corresponding lower bound instances. Notably, in many cases these instances are invariant under the action of a large permutation group. This yields the question how symmetries in a formulation degrade the performance of the relaxation obtained by the \sos{} hierarchy. In this paper, we study this for the case of the minimum makespan problem on identical machines. Our first result is to show that $Ω(n)$ rounds of \sos{} applied over the \emph{configuration linear program} yields an integrality gap of at least $1.0009$, where $n$ is the number of jobs. Our result is based on tools from representation theory of symmetric groups. Then, we consider the weaker \emph{assignment linear program} and add a well chosen set of symmetry breaking inequalities that removes a subset of the machine permutation symmetries. We show that applying $2^{\tilde{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)}$ rounds of the SA hierarchy to this stronger linear program reduces the integrality gap to $1+\varepsilon$, which yields a linear programming based polynomial time approximation scheme. Our results suggest that for this classical problem, symmetries were the main barrier preventing the \sos{}/ SA hierarchies to give relaxations of polynomial complexity with an integrality gap of~$1+\varepsilon$. We leave as an open question whether this phenomenon occurs for other symmetric problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Dynamic Approximate Maximum Independent Set of Intervals, Hypercubes and Hyperrectangles

Independent set is a fundamental problem in combinatorial optimization. While in general graphs the problem is essentially inapproximable, for many important graph classes there are approximation algorithms known in the offline setting. These graph classes include interval graphs and geometric intersection graphs, where vertices correspond to intervals/geometric objects and an edge indicates that the two corresponding objects intersect. We present dynamic approximation algorithms for independent set of intervals, hypercubes and hyperrectangles in $d$ dimensions. They work in the fully dynamic model where each update inserts or deletes a geometric object. All our algorithms are deterministic and have worst-case update times that are polylogarithmic for constant $d$ and $ε> 0$, assuming that the coordinates of all input objects are in $[0, N]^d$ and each of their edges has length at least 1. We obtain the following results: $\bullet$ For weighted intervals, we maintain a $(1+ε)$-approximate solution. $\bullet$ For $d$-dimensional hypercubes we maintain a $(1+ε)2^{d}$-approximate solution in the unweighted case and a $O(2^{d})$-approximate solution in the weighted case. Also, we show that for maintaining an unweighted $(1+ε)$-approximate solution one needs polynomial update time for $d\ge2$ if the ETH holds. $\bullet$ For weighted $d$-dimensional hyperrectangles we present a dynamic algorithm with approximation ratio $(1+ε)\log^{d-1}N$.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2020

Explicit and Implicit Dynamic Coloring of Graphs with Bounded Arboricity

Graph coloring is a fundamental problem in computer science. We study the fully dynamic version of the problem in which the graph is undergoing edge insertions and deletions and we wish to maintain a vertex-coloring with small update time after each insertion and deletion. We show how to maintain an $O(α\lg n)$-coloring with polylogarithmic update time, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph and $α$ is the current arboricity of the graph. This improves upon a result by Solomon and Wein (ESA'18) who maintained an $O(α_{\max}\lg^2 n)$-coloring, where $α_{\max}$ is the maximum arboricity of the graph over all updates. Furthermore, motivated by a lower bound by Barba et al. (Algorithmica'19), we initiate the study of implicit dynamic colorings. Barba et al. showed that dynamic algorithms with polylogarithmic update time cannot maintain an $f(α)$-coloring for any function $f$ when the vertex colors are stored explicitly, i.e., for each vertex the color is stored explicitly in the memory. Previously, all dynamic algorithms maintained explicit colorings. Therefore, we propose to study implicit colorings, i.e., the data structure only needs to offer an efficient query procedure to return the color of a vertex (instead of storing its color explicitly). We provide an algorithm which breaks the lower bound and maintains an implicit $2^{O(α)}$-coloring with polylogarithmic update time. In particular, this yields the first dynamic $O(1)$-coloring for graphs with constant arboricity such as planar graphs or graphs with bounded tree-width, which is impossible using explicit colorings. We also show how to dynamically maintain a partition of the graph's edges into $O(α)$ forests with polylogarithmic update time. We believe this data structure is of independent interest and might have more applications in the future.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Breaking the Barrier of 2 for the Storage Allocation Problem

Packing problems are an important class of optimization problems. The probably most well-known problem if this type is knapsack and many generalizations of it have been studied in the literature like Two-dimensional Geometric Knapsack (2DKP) and Unsplittable Flow on a Path (UFP). For the latter two problems, recently the first polynomial time approximation algorithms with better approximation ratios than 2 were presented [Gálvez et al., FOCS 2017][Grandoni et al., STOC 2018]. In this paper we break the barrier of 2 for the Storage Allocation Problem (SAP) which is a natural intermediate problem between 2DKP and UFP. We are given a path with capacitated edges and a set of tasks where each task has a start vertex, an end vertex, a size, and a profit. We seek to select the most profitable set of tasks that we can draw as non-overlapping rectangles underneath the capacity profile of the edges where the height of each rectangle equals the size of the corresponding task. This problem is motivated by settings of allocation resources like memory, bandwidths, etc. where each request needs a contiguous portion of the resource. The best known polynomial time approximation algorithm for SAP has an approximation ratio of 2+epsilon$ [Mömke and Wiese, ICALP 2015] and no better quasi-polynomial time algorithm is known. We present a polynomial time (63/32) < 1.969-approximation algorithm for the case of uniform edge capacities and a quasi-polynomial time (1.997)-approximation algorithm for non-uniform quasi-polynomially bounded edge capacities. Finally, we show that under slight resource augmentation we can obtain approximation ratios of 3/2 + epsilon in polynomial time and 1 + epsilon in quasi-polynomial time, both for arbitrary edge capacities.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Parameterized Approximation Schemes for Independent Set of Rectangles and Geometric Knapsack

The area of parameterized approximation seeks to combine approximation and parameterized algorithms to obtain, e.g., (1+eps)-approximations in f(k,eps)n^{O(1)} time where k is some parameter of the input. We obtain the following results on parameterized approximability: 1) In the maximum independent set of rectangles problem (MISR) we are given a collection of n axis parallel rectangles in the plane. Our goal is to select a maximum-cardinality subset of pairwise non-overlapping rectangles. This problem is NP-hard and also W[1]-hard [Marx, ESA'05]. The best-known polynomial-time approximation factor is O(loglog n) [Chalermsook and Chuzhoy, SODA'09] and it admits a QPTAS [Adamaszek and Wiese, FOCS'13; Chuzhoy and Ene, FOCS'16]. Here we present a parameterized approximation scheme (PAS) for MISR, i.e. an algorithm that, for any given constant eps>0 and integer k>0, in time f(k,eps)n^{g(eps)}, either outputs a solution of size at least k/(1+eps), or declares that the optimum solution has size less than k. 2) In the (2-dimensional) geometric knapsack problem (TDK) we are given an axis-aligned square knapsack and a collection of axis-aligned rectangles in the plane (items). Our goal is to translate a maximum cardinality subset of items into the knapsack so that the selected items do not overlap. In the version of TDK with rotations (TDKR), we are allowed to rotate items by 90 degrees. Both variants are NP-hard, and the best-known polynomial-time approximation factors are 558/325+eps and 4/3+eps, resp. [Galvez et al., FOCS'17]. These problems admit a QPTAS for polynomially bounded item sizes [Adamaszek and Wiese, SODA'15]. We show that both variants are W[1]-hard. Furthermore, we present a PAS for TDKR. For all considered problems, getting time f(k,eps)n^{O(1)}, rather than f(k,eps)n^{g(eps)}, would give FPT time f'(k)n^{O(1)} exact algorithms using eps=1/(k+1), contradicting W[1]-hardness.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

On the extension complexity of scheduling

Linear programming is a powerful method in combinatorial optimization with many applications in theory and practice. For solving a linear program quickly it is desirable to have a formulation of small size for the given problem. A useful approach for this is the construction of an extended formulation, which is a linear program in a higher dimensional space whose projection yields the original linear program. For many problems it is known that a small extended formulation cannot exist. However, most of these problems are either $\mathsf{NP}$-hard (like TSP), or only quite complicated polynomial time algorithms are known for them (like for the matching problem). In this work we study the minimum makespan problem on identical machines in which we want to assign a set of $n$ given jobs to $m$ machines in order to minimize the maximum load over the machines. We prove that the canonical formulation for this problem has extension complexity $2^{Ω(n/\log n)}$, even if each job has size 1 or 2 and the optimal makespan is 2. This is a case that a trivial greedy algorithm can solve optimally! For the more powerful configuration integer program, we even prove a lower bound of $2^{Ω(n)}$. On the other hand, we show that there is an abstraction of the configuration integer program admitting an extended formulation of size $f(\text{opt})\cdot \text{poly}(n,m)$. In addition, we give an $O(\log n)$-approximate integral formulation of polynomial size, even for arbitrary processing times and for the far more general setting of unrelated machines.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Quasi-polynomial time approximation schemes for packing and covering problems in planar graphs

We consider two optimization problems in planar graphs. In Maximum Weight Independent Set of Objects we are given a graph $G$ and a family $\mathcal{D}$ of objects, each being a connected subgraph of $G$ with a prescribed weight, and the task is to find a maximum-weight subfamily of $\mathcal{D}$ consisting of pairwise disjoint objects. In Minimum Weight Distance Set Cover we are given an edge-weighted graph $G$, two sets $\mathcal{D},\mathcal{C}$ of vertices of $G$, where vertices of $\mathcal{D}$ have prescribed weights, and a nonnegative radius $r$. The task is to find a minimum-weight subset of $\mathcal{D}$ such that every vertex of $\mathcal{C}$ is at distance at most $r$ from some selected vertex. Via simple reductions, these two problems generalize a number of geometric optimization tasks, notably Maximum Weight Independent Set for polygons in the plane and Weighted Geometric Set Cover for unit disks and unit squares. We present quasi-polynomial time approximation schemes (QPTASs) for both of the above problems in planar graphs: given an accuracy parameter $ε>0$ we can compute a solution whose weight is within multiplicative factor of $(1+ε)$ from the optimum in time $2^{\mathrm{poly}(1/ε,\log |\mathcal{D}|)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the input graph. Our main technical contribution is to transfer the techniques used for recursive approximation schemes for geometric problems due to Adamaszek, Har-Peled, and Wiese to the setting of planar graphs. In particular, this yields a purely combinatorial viewpoint on these methods.

cs.DS↗