Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Andreea-Alexandra Musat

Publications and source records attributed to Andreea-Alexandra Musat.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Gradient descent reaches arbitrary accuracy in a fixed number of large steps on multiclass logistic regression

We show that gradient descent (GD) with step size $η$ can achieve $\varepsilon$ optimality gap on the multiclass logistic regression loss in a number of iterations $T$ that is independent of $\varepsilon$. To do so, the step size $η$ must be chosen large enough as a function of $\varepsilon$ (and properties of the linearly separable dataset), while $T$ is a constant that only depends on the data. The relevant properties of the data include the number of points and their margin (for $T$), and one additional quantity (for $η$) that turns out to be necessary in dimension $d \geq 3$. The proofs build on the known fact that, as $η\to \infty$, suitably rescaled GD becomes the perceptron algorithm, and the latter finds a perfect classifier in $T$ iterations. A similar claim was shown for two classes in dimension $d = 2$ using other proof techniques. This result adds to previous works that showed GD on the logistic regression loss can be accelerated by taking large step sizes. Those provoke a wild, oscillatory initial phase, followed by a stable phase. We provide results of this (qualitatively different) nature, too.

math.OC↗

Gradient descent avoids strict saddles with a simple line-search method too

It is known that gradient descent (GD) on a $C^2$ cost function generically avoids strict saddle points when using a small, constant step size. However, no such guarantee existed for GD with a line-search method. We provide one for a modified version of the standard Armijo backtracking method with generic, arbitrarily large initial step size. The proof underlines the role of the Luzin $N^{-1}$ property for the iteration maps, and allows to forgo the habitual Lipschitz gradient assumption. We extend this to the Riemannian setting (RGD), assuming the retraction is real analytic (though the cost function still only needs to be $C^2$). In closing, we also improve guarantees for RGD with a constant step size in some scenarios.

math.OC↗