arXiv subjects

Andrew M McNutt

Publications and source records attributed to Andrew M McNutt.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Trade-offs in Data Color Palette Design Tools

Designing a color palette for data requires designers to balance multiple constraints, including accessibility and aesthetics. Color palette tools support this process through features including direct manipulation, automated palette generation and evaluation, previews, and so on. Despite their prominence, relatively little is known about how these different mechanisms shape design across contexts. We conducted an exploratory think-aloud crowd work study with 40 self-identified designers. Each participant used one of four palette tools selected to span different interaction modalities to complete a series of accessibility- and aesthetics-oriented design tasks. We observed two preliminary patterns. First, tool differences were more pronounced in accessibility-constrained tasks. Second, even when accessibility was not explicitly required, some tools produced more accessibility-friendly palettes and prompted more accessibility-oriented thinking. In this tool genre, then, system design shapes outcomes both via built-in functionality, as well as by directing designers' attention toward particular constraints and design considerations.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Considering Contribution Statements in Visualization and HCI Research

Contribution statements are an increasingly common way to make research labor visible, reduce academic malfeasance, and provide broader transparency. Despite this potential value, they remain uncommon in visualization and HCI. To explore this gap, we conducted an online study with (N=21) visualization and HCI researchers. We find a range of differing opinions about the utility of contribution statements, which are set against a background of tensions relating to contribution frameworks that inadequately fit contribution types in HCI and especially visualization, power dynamics between authors, bias in authorship perceptions, and the tedium of providing yet another form of documentation. From these factors, we offer a modest recommendation to authors: consider contribution statements. There are contexts when they may usefully explicate work, and others where they can cause author-team conflict or become a burdensome chore. Regardless of whether they are used by readers or not, we suggest that scaffolded mechanisms for reflecting on contribution roles are valuable both for public accountability and internal alignment. To institutions, we recommend that contribution statements be exempt from page or word limits, and that flexible templates and examples be provided to authors, but that they continue to not be required. By surfacing these perspectives, we seek to open a dialogue about what constitutes authorship, how our community might move toward more equitable and transparent attribution practices, and where the visualization and HCI communities might be uniquely equipped to help.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2021

Visualization for Villainy

Visualization has long been seen as a dependable and trustworthy tool for carrying out analysis and communication tasks -- a view reinforced by the growing interest in applying it to socially positive ends. However, despite the benign light in which visualization is usually perceived, it carries the potential to do harm to people, places, concepts, and things. In this paper, we capitalize on this negative potential to serve an underrepresented (but technologically engaged) group: villains. To achieve these ends, we introduce a design space for this type of graphical violence, which allows us to unify prior work on deceptive visualization with novel data-driven dastardly deeds, such as emotional spear phishing and unsafe data physicalization. By charting this vile charting landscape, we open new doors to collaboration with terrifying domain experts, and hopefully, make the world just a bit worse.

cs.HC↗