SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Andy A. Shen

Publications and source records attributed to Andy A. Shen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Forest Kernel Balancing Weights: Outcome-Guided Features for Causal Inference

While balancing covariates between groups is central for observational causal inference, selecting which features to balance remains a challenging problem. Kernel balancing is a promising approach that first estimates a kernel that captures similarity across units and then balances a (possibly low-dimensional) summary of that kernel, indirectly learning important features to balance. In this paper, we propose forest kernel balancing, which leverages the underappreciated fact that tree-based machine learning models, namely random forests and Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), implicitly estimate a kernel based on the co-occurrence of observations in the same terminal leaf node. Thus, even though the resulting kernel is solely a function of baseline features, the selected nonlinearities and other interactions are important for predicting the outcome -- and therefore are important for addressing confounding. Through simulations and applied illustrations, we show that forest kernel balancing leads to meaningful computational and statistical improvement relative to standard kernel methods, which do not incorporate outcome information when learning features.

stat.ME

Leveraging External Controls for Treatment Switching in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Weighted Causal Inference Framework for Overall Survival

In many oncology clinical trials where overall survival is a key endpoint, patients are permitted to switch from the control arm to the experimental treatment arm or other suitable therapies. Switching can occur for various reasons, including disease progression. This violates the causal guarantees of randomized treatment assignment, resulting in biased treatment effect estimates. Existing methods often require strong assumptions, complicated model specifications, or both. In this paper, we propose a general framework that incorporates external controls to account for treatment switching in randomized controlled trials. Leveraging the synthetic control method and balancing weights from observational causal inference, we propose several estimators that use multiple imputation and time-varying weights to adjust for treatment switching. We also discuss approaches to selecting the risk set of external controls to impute from. Through extensive simulation studies, we show that our proposed methods lead to meaningful statistical improvements relative to standard adjustment methods that utilize external controls in naive ways or those that do not utilize external controls at all. We then demonstrate the utility of our external control-based approaches with two phase III oncology trials.

stat.ME

Assessing the Role of Volumetric Brain Information in Multiple Sclerosis Progression

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system. Understanding multiple sclerosis progression and identifying the implicated brain structures is crucial for personalized treatment decisions. Deformation-based morphometry utilizes anatomical magnetic resonance imaging to quantitatively assess volumetric brain changes at the voxel level, providing insight into how each brain region contributes to clinical progression with regards to neurodegeneration. Utilizing such voxel-level data from a relapsing multiple sclerosis clinical trial, we extend a model-agnostic feature importance metric to identify a robust and predictive feature set that corresponds to clinical progression. These features correspond to brain regions that are clinically meaningful in MS disease research, demonstrating their scientific relevance. When used to predict progression using classical survival models and 3D convolutional neural networks, the identified regions led to the best-performing models, demonstrating their prognostic strength. We also find that these features generalize well to other definitions of clinical progression and can compensate for the omission of highly prognostic clinical features, underscoring the predictive power and clinical relevance of deformation-based morphometry as a regional identification tool.

stat.AP

A Calibrated Sensitivity Analysis for Weighted Causal Decompositions

Disparities in health or well-being experienced by minority groups can be difficult to study using the traditional exposure-outcome paradigm in causal inference, since potential outcomes in variables such as race or sexual minority status are challenging to interpret. Causal decomposition analysis addresses this gap by positing causal effects on disparities under interventions to other, intervenable exposures that may play a mediating role in the disparity. While invoking weaker assumptions than causal mediation approaches, decomposition analyses are often conducted in observational settings and require uncheckable assumptions that eliminate unmeasured confounders. Leveraging the marginal sensitivity model, we develop a sensitivity analysis for weighted causal decomposition estimators and use the percentile bootstrap to construct valid confidence intervals for causal effects on disparities. We also propose a two-parameter reformulation that enhances interpretability and facilitates an intuitive understanding of the plausibility of unmeasured confounders and their effects. We illustrate our framework on a study examining the effect of parental acceptance on disparities in suicidal ideation among sexual minority youth. We find that the effect is small and sensitive to unmeasured confounding, suggesting that further screening studies are needed to identify mitigating interventions in this vulnerable population.

stat.ME