On the Effects of Decentralized Moderation on Network Robustness and Information Diffusion in Mastodon
Decentralized online social networks such as Mastodon distribute moderation power across thousands of independently governed servers, raising fundamental questions about how local block decisions shape global structure and information flow. In this paper, we analyze Mastodon at the instance level by constructing a signed, directed, temporal network in which positive edges aggregate inter-instance follow relationships and negative edges encode daily block actions. Using one year of data, we show that despite continuous moderation activity and changing roles among instances, the network exhibits strong structural stability: signed dyadic motifs and degree distributions display highly persistent dynamics, and aggregated transition matrices satisfy Markovian equilibrium conditions over intermediate time scales. Building on the marked asymmetry between instances that predominantly issue bans and those that are mostly banned, we then study information diffusion on the positive network via a hybrid contagion model that combines simple contagion within groups and complex contagion across groups. We find that information originating in the minority of moderating instances spreads more efficiently, both internally and toward the majority, while the opposite direction is fragile and sensitive to contagion parameters. Echo-chamber effects emerge even in a globally balanced signed network and become stronger under stricter contagion conditions. Together, these results show that decentralized moderation in Mastodon generates a stable macroscopic configuration that both structures and constrains information exchange, effectively isolating norm-violating domains without centralized control.