SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Angelo Leone

Publications and source records attributed to Angelo Leone.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

AI Skills Improve Job Prospects: Causal Evidence from a Hiring Experiment

The growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has heightened interest in the labor market value of AI related skills, yet causal evidence on their role in hiring decisions remains scarce. This study examines whether AI skills serve as a positive hiring signal and whether they can offset conventional disadvantages such as older age or lower formal education. We conducted an experimental survey with 1,725 recruiters from the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany. Using a paired conjoint design, recruiters evaluated hypothetical candidates represented by synthetically designed resumes. Across three occupations of graphic design, office assistance, and software engineering, AI skills significantly increase interview invitation probabilities by approximately 8 to 15 percentage points, compared with candidates without such skills. AI credentials, such as university or company backed skill certificates, only lead to a moderate increase in invitation probabilities compared with self declaration of AI skills. AI skills also partially or fully offset disadvantages related to age and lower education, with effects strongest for office assistants, for whom formal AI certificates play a significant additional compensatory role. Effects are weaker for graphic designers, consistent with more skeptical recruiter attitudes toward AI in creative work. Finally, recruiters own background and AI usage significantly moderate these effects. Overall, the findings demonstrate that AI skills function as a powerful hiring signal and can mitigate traditional labor market disadvantages, with implications for workers skill acquisition strategies and firms recruitment practices.

econ.GN

Mapping the Parasocial AI Market: User Trends, Engagement and Risks

A scan of 110 AI companion platforms reveals a rapidly growing global market for emotionally engaging, personalized AI interactions. While parasocial use of general-purpose AI (GPAI) tools currently dominates, a growing number of platforms are designed specifically for care, transactional, or mating companionship. In the UK alone, these platforms receive between 46 million and 91 million monthly visits (1.1-2.2 billion globally), with users spending an average of 3.5 minutes per session. For context, Instagram averaged 67.3 million UK visits per month between January and March 2025. Notably, mating-oriented AI companions make up 44% of UK visits (higher than the global average of 30%) but see lower session times and return rates than mixed-use platforms. As mating-oriented romantic AI offerings improve, increased engagement may follow, raising urgent concerns about online safety, particularly for children, given weak age safeguards. Meanwhile, GPAI tools are moving toward more emotionally intelligent, personalized interactions, making parasocial AI use increasingly mainstream. These trends highlight the need for the UK AI Security Institute (AISI) to monitor this sector and assess whether existing regulation sufficiently addresses emerging societal risks.

cs.CY