Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Anjana Mondal

Publications and source records attributed to Anjana Mondal.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficient Tests for Testing in Two-way ANOVA under Heteroscedasticity

New tests are developed for two-way ANOVA models with heterogeneous error variances. The testing problems are considered for testing the significant interaction effects, simple effects, and treatment effects. The likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) and simultaneous comparison tests are derived for all three problems. Hill climbing algorithms have been proposed to compute the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of parameters under the restrictions on the null and alternative hypotheses. It is proved that the proposed algorithms converge to the MLEs. A parametric bootstrap algorithm is provided for the computation of the critical points. The simulated power values of the proposed tests are compared with two existing tests. For testing main effects in the additive ANOVA model, the LRT appears to be about $30\%$ to $50\%$ gain in power over the available tests. Also, the proposed tests for the interaction and simple effects are seen to have comparable power and size performance to the existing tests. The behavior of the proposed tests under the non-normal error distribution is also discussed. Four real data sets are used to demonstrate the application of the proposed tests. A software package is made in `R' to make it simple to apply the tests to experimental data sets.

stat.ME↗

Testing Against Tree Ordered Alternatives in One-way ANOVA

The likelihood ratio test against a tree ordered alternative in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA is considered for the first time. Bootstrap is used to implement this and two multiple comparisons based tests and shown to have very good size and power performance. In this paper, the problem of testing the homogeneity of mean effects against the tree ordered alternative is considered in the heteroscedastic one-way ANOVA model. The likelihood ratio test and two multiple comparison-based tests - named Max-D and Min-D are proposed and implemented using the parametric bootstrap method. An extensive simulation study shows that these tests effectively control type-I error rates for various choices of sample sizes and error variances. Further, the likelihood ratio and Max-D tests achieve very good powers in all cases. The test Min-D is seen to perform better than the other two for some specific configurations of parameters. The robustness of these tests is investigated by implementing some non-normal distributions, viz., skew-normal, Laplace, exponential, mixture-normal, and t distributions. `R' packages are developed and shared on "Github" for the ease of users. The proposed tests are illustrated on a dataset of patients undergoing psychological treatments.

stat.ME↗