Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Anjana Rajasekhar

Publications and source records attributed to Anjana Rajasekhar.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Is Word Error Rate Enough? Rethinking Privacy Evaluation in Speech with Entity-Aware Metrics

As the use of smart devices continues to increase, their potential to capture sensitive speech content raises growing privacy concerns. It is therefore critical to develop techniques that prevent information leakage while preserving the utility of the audio, and evaluation metrics that accurately quantify the level of privacy without overestimating it. In this work, we evaluate the effectiveness of two obfuscation techniques in protecting speech content, with particular emphasis on named entities, by adapting entity-aware privacy metrics from the Natural Language Processing field to the speech privacy domain. Further, we investigate several attack scenarios and show that fine-tuning on entity-rich data improves attack performance for some entity categories but not others. Finally, we provide guidance on metric selection based on whether the obfuscation method preserves temporal alignment.

eess.AS↗

From Read Speech to Spoken Digits: A Task-Specific Evaluation of Speech Privacy With Informed Attackers

Protecting speech privacy in real-life audio recordings is a growing concern. This contribution evaluates the effectiveness of three obfuscation techniques in protecting linguistic speech content, using digit recognition as a task-specific and practically motivated evaluation scenario. As a first baseline, a general-purpose speech recognition model and a digit-specific classifier were applied as informed attackers to recognise both single digits and concatenated digit sequences. Our experimental results demonstrate significant differences in recognition performance across digit modality, speech rate, and attack model. These findings emphasize the need for more comprehensive and application-oriented evaluation methods to ensure speech privacy.

eess.AS↗

Assessing the Impact of Noise and Speech Enhancement on the Intelligibility of Speech Codecs

Preserving speech intelligibility is a minimum requirement for speech codecs in communication. Recently, very low-bitrate neural codecs have gained interest for replacing classical codecs, reinforcing the need to evaluate whether intelligibility is preserved in realistic scenarios. In this paper, we evaluate the intelligibility and listening effort of classical and neural speech codecs in clean and noisy conditions. Further, we assess the impact of speech enhancement (SE) before coding, simulating a possible audio processing pipeline. The results show that classical codecs are more noise robust than neural codecs. Further, SE can lead to significant intelligibility and listening effort improvements for codecs otherwise negatively affected by noise. Listening effort reveals nuanced differences when intelligibility is saturated. Lastly, objective intelligibility based on automatic speech recognition is highly correlated with subjective intelligibility scores averaged per condition.

eess.AS↗

Benchmarking Neural Speech Codec Intelligibility with SITool

Speech intelligibility assessment is essential for evaluating neural speech codecs, yet most evaluation efforts focus on overall quality rather than intelligibility. Only a few publicly available tools exist for conducting standardized intelligibility tests, like the Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT) and Modified Rhyme Test (MRT). We introduce the Speech Intelligibility Toolkit for Subjective Evaluation (SITool), a Flask-based web application for conducting DRT and MRT in laboratory and crowdsourcing settings. We use SITool to benchmark 13 neural and traditional speech codecs, analyzing phoneme-level degradations and comparing subjective DRT results with objective intelligibility metrics. Our findings show that, while neural speech codecs can outperform traditional ones in subjective intelligibility, only STOI and ESTOI - not WER - significantly correlate with subjective results, although they struggle to capture gender and wordlist-specific variations observed in subjective evaluations.

eess.AS↗