arXiv subjects

Anjolina G. de Oliveira

Publications and source records attributed to Anjolina G. de Oliveira.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Prime-Generated Formalization of Nagata's Factoriality Theorem in Lean 4

We present a Lean 4 Mathlib formalization of Nagata's factoriality theorem: if R is a noetherian domain and S <= R is a prime-generated submonoid such that S^{-1}R is a UFD, then R itself is a UFD. The prime-generated hypothesis -- every element of S is a finite product of primes belonging to S -- replaces a superficially cleaner but degenerate prime-or-unit condition that the formalization effort exposed. The development packages the theorem both for the concrete type Localization S and through abstract IsLocalization formulations. As applications, we formalize two Nagata-based proofs that R[X] is a UFD whenever R is a noetherian UFD: one via Laurent-polynomial localization at powers of X, and one via localization at the constant primes and identification with Frac(R)[X]. Reusing the same package, we also obtain the iterated polynomial corollary R[X][Y]. No public formalization of this result is known to us in Lean, Coq, or Isabelle.

math.AC↗

arXiv2025

The Seifert-van Kampen Theorem via Computational Paths: A Formalized Approach to Computing Fundamental Groups

The Seifert-van Kampen theorem computes the fundamental group of a space from the fundamental groups of its constituents. We develop a modular SVK framework within the setting of computational paths - an approach to equality where witnesses are explicit sequences of rewrites governed by the LNDEQ-TRS. Our contributions are: (i) pushouts as higher-inductive types with modular typeclass assumptions for computation rules; (ii) free products and amalgamated free products as quotients of word representations; (iii) an SVK equivalence schema parametric in user-supplied encode/decode structure; and (iv) instantiations for classical spaces - figure-eight (pi_1(S^1 v S^1) = Z * Z), 2-sphere (pi_1(S^2) = 1), and 3-sphere (pi_1(S^3) = 1) with Hopf fibration context. Recent extensions include higher homotopy groups pi_n via weak infinity-groupoid structure (with pi_2 abelian via Eckmann-Hilton), and pi_1 >= 1 in the 1-groupoid truncated setting; truncation levels connecting the framework to HoTT; automated path simplification tactics; basic covering space theory with pi_1-actions on fibers; fibration theory with long exact sequences; and Eilenberg-MacLane space characterization (S^1 = K(Z,1)). The development is formalized in Lean 4 with 41,130 lines across 107 modules, using 36 kernel axioms for HIT type-constructor declarations.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Computational Paths Form a Weak ω-Groupoid

Lumsdaine (2010) and van den Berg-Garner (2011) proved that types in Martin-Löf type theory carry the structure of weak ω-groupoids. Their proofs, while foundational, rely on abstract properties of the identity type without providing explicit computational content for coherence witnesses. We establish an analogous result for computational paths -- an alternative formulation of equality where witnesses are explicit sequences of rewrites from the LNDEQ-TRS term rewriting system. Our main result is that computational paths on any type form a weak ω-groupoid with fully explicit coherence data. The groupoid operations -- identity, composition, and inverse -- are defined at every dimension, and the coherence laws (associativity, unit laws, inverse laws) are witnessed by concrete rewrite derivations rather than abstract existence proofs. The construction provides: (i) a proper tower of n-cells for all dimensions, with 2-cells as derivations between paths and higher cells mediating between lower-dimensional witnesses; (ii) explicit pentagon and triangle coherences built from the rewrite rules; and (iii) contractibility at dimensions $\geq 3$, ensuring all parallel higher cells are connected. The contractibility property is derived from the normalization algorithm of the rewrite system, grounding the higher-dimensional structure in concrete computational content. The entire construction has been formalized in Lean 4, providing machine-checked verification of the weak ω-groupoid structure.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Formalizing Computational Paths and Fundamental Groups in Lean

Computational paths treat propositional equality as explicit paths built from labelled deduction steps and rewrite rules. This view originates in work by de Queiroz and collaborators [1] and yields a weak groupoid structure for equality, together with a computational account of homotopy inspired by homotopy type theory. In this paper we present a complete mechanization of this framework in Lean 4 and show how it supports concrete homotopy theoretic computations. Our contributions are threefold. First, we formalize the theory of computational paths in Lean, including path formation, composition, inverses, and a rewrite system that identifies redundant or trivial paths. We prove that equality types with computational paths carry a weak groupoid structure in the sense of the original theory. Second, we organize this material into a reusable Lean library, ComputationalPathsLean, which exposes an interface for paths, rewrites, and loop spaces. This library allows later developments to treat computational paths as a drop-in replacement for propositional equality when reasoning about homotopical structure. Third, we apply the library to six canonical examples in algebraic topology. We give Lean proofs that the fundamental group of the circle is isomorphic to the integers, the cylinder and Mobius band also have fundamental group isomorphic to the integers (via retraction to the circle), the fundamental group of the torus is isomorphic to the product of two copies of the integers, the fundamental group of the Klein bottle is isomorphic to the semidirect product Z cross Z, and the fundamental group of the real projective plane is isomorphic to Z_2. These case studies demonstrate that the computational paths approach scales to nontrivial homotopical computations in a modern proof assistant. All the definitions and proofs described here are available in an open-source Lean 4 repository.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Computational Paths -- An approach in the $LND_{EQ}-TRS_{2}$ system

We use a labelled deduction system ( LND$_{ED-}$TRS ) based on the concept of computational paths (sequences of rewrites) as equalities between two terms of the same type, which allowed us to carry out in homotopic theory an approach using the concept of computational paths. From this, we show that the computational paths can be used to perform the proofs of the $LND_{EQ}-TRS_{2}$ rewriting system.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

A Topological Application of Labelled Natural Deduction

We use a labelled deduction system based on the concept of computational paths (sequences of rewrites) as equalities between two terms of the same type. We also define a term rewriting system that is used to make computations between these computational paths, establishing equalities between equalities. We then proceed to show the main result here: using this system to obtain the calculation of the fundamental group of the circle, of the torus and the real projective plane.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2019

An alternative approach to the calculation of fundamental groups based on labeled natural deduction

In this work, we use a labelled deduction system based on the concept of computational paths (sequence of rewrites) as equalities between two terms of the same type. We also define a term rewriting system that is used to make computations between these computational paths, establishing equalities between equalities. We use a labelled deduction system based on the concept of computational paths (sequence of rewrites) to obtain some results of algebraic topology and with support of the Seifet-Van Kampen Theorem we will calculate, in a way less complex than the one made in mathematics \cite{Munkres} and the technique of homotopy type theory \cite{hott}, the fundamental group of Klein Blottle $\mathbb{K}^2$, of the Torus $\mathbb{T}^2$ and Two holed Torus $\mathbb{M}_2=\mathbb{T}^2\# \mathbb{T}^2$ (the connected sum two torus).

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

On the Calculation of Fundamental Groups in Homotopy Type Theory by Means of Computational Paths

One of the most interesting entities of homotopy type theory is the identity type. It gives rise to an interesting interpretation of the equality, since one can semantically interpret the equality between two terms of the same type as a collection of homotopical paths between points of the same space. Since this is only a semantical interpretation, the addition of paths to the syntax of homotopy type theory has been recently proposed by De Queiroz, Ramos and De Oliveira . In these works, the authors propose an entity known as `computational path', proposed by De Queiroz and Gabbay in 1994, and show that it can be used to formalize the identity type. We have found that it is possible to use these computational paths as a tool to achieve one central result of algebraic topology and homotopy type theory: the calculation of fundamental groups of surfaces. We review the concept of computational paths and the $LND_{EQ}-TRS$, which is a term rewriting system proposed by De Oliveira in 1994 to map redundancies between computational paths. We then proceed to calculate the fundamental group of the circle, cylinder, M{ö}bius band, torus and the real projective plane. Moreover, we show that the use of computational paths make these calculations simple and straightforward, whereas the same result is much harder to obtain using the traditional code-encode-decode approach of homotopy type theory.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

Explicit Computational Paths

The treatment of equality as a type in type theory gives rise to an interesting type-theoretic structure known as `identity type'. The idea is that, given terms $a,b$ of a type $A$, one may form the type $Id_{A}(a,b)$, whose elements are proofs that $a$ and $b$ are equal elements of type $A$. A term of this type, $p : Id_{A}(a,b)$, makes up for the grounds (or proof) that establishes that $a$ is indeed equal to $b$. Based on that, a proof of equality can be seen as a sequence of substitutions and rewrites, also known as a `computational path'. One interesting fact is that it is possible to rewrite computational paths using a set of reduction rules arising from an analysis of redundancies in paths. These rules were mapped by De Oliveira in 1994 in a term rewrite system known as $LND_{EQ}-TRS$. Here we use computational paths and this term rewrite system to develop the main foundations of homotopy type theory, i.e., we develop the lemmas and theorems connected to the main types of this theory, types such as products, coproducts, identity type, transport and many others. We also show that it is possible to directly construct path spaces through computational paths. To show this, we construct the natural numbers and the fundamental group of the circle, showing results connected to these structures.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

On the Use of Computational Paths in Path Spaces of Homotopy Type Theory

The treatment of equality as a type in type theory gives rise to an interesting type-theoretic structure known as `identity type'. The idea is that, given terms $a,b$ of a type $A$, one may form the type $Id_{A}(a,b)$, whose elements are proofs that $a$ and $b$ are equal elements of type $A$. A term of this type, $p : Id_{A}(a,b)$, makes up for the grounds (or proof) that establishes that $a$ is indeed equal to $b$. Based on that, a proof of equality can be seen as a sequence of substitutions and rewrites, also known as a `computational path'. One interesting fact is that it is possible to rewrite computational paths using a set of reduction rules arising from an analysis of redundancies in paths. These rules were mapped by De Oliveira in 1994 in a term rewrite system known as $LND_{EQ}-TRS$. Here we use computational paths and this term rewrite system to work with path spaces. In homotopy type theory, the main technique used to define path spaces is the code-encode-decode approach. Our objective is to propose an alternative approach based on the theory of computational paths. We believe this new approach is simpler and more straightforward than the code-encode-decode one. We then use our approach to obtain two important results of homotopy type theory: the construction of the path space of the naturals and the calculation of the fundamental group of the circle.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

Sequentialization for full N-Graphs via sub-N-Graphs

Since proof-nets for MLL- were introduced by Girard (1987), several studies have appeared dealing with its soundness proof. Bellin & Van de Wiele (1995) produced an elegant proof based on properties of subnets (empires and kingdoms) and Robinson (2003) proposed a straightforward generalization of this presentation for proof-nets from sequent calculus for classical logic. In 2014 it was presented an extension of these studies to obtain a proof of the sequentialization theorem for the fragment of N-Graphs with conjunction, disjunction and negation connectives, via the notion of sub-N-Graphs. N-Graphs is a symmetric natural deduction calculus with multiple conclusions that adopts Danos-Regnier's criterion and has defocussing switchable links. In this paper, we present a sequentization for full propositional classical N-Graphs, showing how to find a split node in the middle of the proof even with a global rule for discharging hypothesis.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2016

On the Groupoid Model of Computational Paths

The main objective of this work is to study mathematical properties of computational paths. Originally proposed by de Queiroz \& Gabbay (1994) as `sequences or rewrites', computational paths are taken to be terms of the identity type of Martin Löf's Intensional Type Theory, since these paths can be seen as the grounds on which the propositional equality between two computational objects stand. From this perspective, this work aims to show that one of the properties of the identity type is present on computational paths. We are referring to the fact that that the identity type induces a groupoid structure, as proposed by Hofmann \& Streicher (1994). Using categorical semantics, we show that computational paths induce a groupoid structure. We also show that computational paths are capable of inducing higher categorical structures.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2015

On the Identity Type as the Type of Computational Paths

We introduce a new way of formalizing the intensional identity type based on the fact that a entity known as computational paths can be interpreted as terms of the identity type. Our approach enjoys the fact that our elimination rule is easy to understand and use. We make this point clear constructing terms of some relevant types using our proposed elimination rule. We also show that the identity type, as defined by our approach, induces a groupoid structure. This result is on par with the fact that the traditional identity type induces a groupoid, as exposed by Hofmann \& Streicher (1994).

cs.LO↗

arXiv2015

Sequences of Rewrites: A Categorical Interpretation

In Martin-Löf's Intensional Type Theory, identity type is a heavily used and studied concept. The reason for that is the fact that it's responsible for the recently discovered connection between Type Theory and Homotopy Theory. The main problem with identity types, as originally formulated, is that they are complex to understand and use. Using that fact as motivation, a much simpler formulation for the identity type was proposed by Queiroz & Gabbay (1994) and further developed by de Queiroz & de Oliveira (2013). In this formulation, an element of an identity type is seen as a sequence of rewrites (or computational paths). Together with the logical rules of this new entity, there exists a system of reduction rules between sequence of rewrites called LND_{EQS}-RWS. This system is constructed using the labelled natural deduction (i.e. Prawitz' Natural Deduction plus derivations-as-terms) and is responsible for establishing how a sequence of rewrites can be rewritten, resulting in a new sequence of rewrites. In this context, we propose a categorical interpretation for this new entity, using the types as objects and the rules of rewrites as morphisms. Moreover, we show that our interpretation is in accordance with some known results, like that types have a groupoidal structure. We also interpret more complicated structures, like the one formed by a rewrite of a sequence of rewrites.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2013

Propositional equality, identity types, and direct computational paths

In proof theory the notion of canonical proof is rather basic, and it is usually taken for granted that a canonical proof of a sentence must be unique up to certain minor syntactical details (such as, e.g., change of bound variables). When setting up a proof theory for equality one is faced with a rather unexpected situation where there may not be a unique canonical proof of an equality statement. Indeed, in a (1994--5) proposal for the formalisation of proofs of propositional equality in the Curry--Howard style, we have already uncovered such a peculiarity. Totally independently, and in a different setting, Hofmann & Streicher (1994) have shown how to build a model of Martin-Löf's Type Theory in which uniqueness of canonical proofs of identity types does not hold. The intention here is to show that, by considering as sequences of rewrites and substitution, it comes a rather natural fact that two (or more) distinct proofs may be yet canonical and are none to be preferred over one another. By looking at proofs of equality as rewriting (or computational) paths this approach will be in line with the recently proposed connections between type theory and homotopy theory via identity types, since elements of identity types will be, concretely, paths (or homotopies).

cs.LO↗