arXiv subjects

Annalivia Polselli

Publications and source records attributed to Annalivia Polselli.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Double Machine Learning with High-dimensional Interactive Fixed Effects

Factor structures are central to empirical work in economics and finance, and are usually used to model time-varying unobserved heterogeneity through interactive fixed effects (IFE). Existing IFE estimators rest on low-dimensional and linear specifications in the covariates, assumptions which are increasingly restrictive in applications drawing on rich datasets with controls of unknown functional form. This paper develops a Double Machine Learning estimator for the high-dimensional partially linear panel model with interactive fixed effects (panel DML-IFE). The method combines projection-based defactorisation of the data, in the spirit of Common Correlated Effects (CCE), with a Neyman-orthogonal score function and cross-fitting procedure, and accommodates low-rank factor structures in outcomes and treatments alongside high-dimensional, potentially nonlinear covariate effects estimated by machine learning algorithms. Monte Carlo simulations show that panel DML-IFE outperforms conventional IFE estimator outside the correctly-specified linear case, with bias reduction driven primarily by the time and covariate dimensions. An empirical application to U.S. stock returns shows that several effects documented under linear specifications lose statistical significance once high-dimensional nonlinear confounding and the presence of IFE are jointly accounted for.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Data with Instrumental Variables: New Method and Applications

Panel data methods are widely used in empirical analysis to address unobserved heterogeneity, but causal inference remains challenging when treatments are endogenous and confounding variables high-dimensional and potentially nonlinear. Standard instrumental variables (IV) estimators, such as two-stage least squares (2SLS), become unreliable when instrument validity requires flexibly conditioning on many covariates with potentially non-linear effects. This paper develops a Double Machine Learning estimator for static panel models with endogenous treatments (panel IV DML), and introduces weak-identification diagnostics for it. We revisit three influential migration studies that use shift-share instruments. In these settings, instrument validity depends on a rich covariate adjustment. In one application, panel IV DML strengthens the predictive power of the instrument and broadly confirms 2SLS results. In the other cases, flexible adjustment makes the instruments weak, leading to substantially more cautious causal inference than conventional 2SLS. Monte Carlo evidence supports these findings, showing that panel IV DML improves estimation accuracy under strong instruments and delivers more reliable inference under weak identification.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

xtdml: Double Machine Learning Estimation to Static Panel Data Models with Fixed Effects in R

The double machine learning (DML) method combines the predictive power of machine learning with statistical estimation to conduct inference about the structural parameter of interest. This paper presents the R package `xtdml`, which implements DML methods for partially linear panel regression models with low-dimensional fixed effects, high-dimensional confounding variables, proposed by Clarke and Polselli (2025). The package provides functionalities to: (a) learn nuisance functions with machine learning algorithms from the `mlr3` ecosystem, (b) handle unobserved individual heterogeneity choosing among first-difference transformation, within-group transformation, and correlated random effects, (c) transform the covariates with min-max normalization and polynomial expansion to improve learning performance. We showcase the use of `xtdml` with both simulated and real longitudinal data.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2024

Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Models with Fixed Effects

Recent advances in causal inference have seen the development of methods which make use of the predictive power of machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we develop novel double machine learning (DML) procedures for panel data in which these algorithms are used to approximate high-dimensional and nonlinear nuisance functions of the covariates. Our new procedures are extensions of the well-known correlated random effects, within-group and first-difference estimators from linear to nonlinear panel models, specifically, Robinson (1988)'s partially linear regression model with fixed effects and unspecified nonlinear confounding. Our simulation study assesses the performance of these procedures using different machine learning algorithms. We use our procedures to re-estimate the impact of minimum wage on voting behaviour in the UK. From our results, we recommend the use of first-differencing because it imposes the fewest constraints on the distribution of the fixed effects, and an ensemble learning strategy to ensure optimum estimator accuracy.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2023

Robust Inference in Panel Data Models: Some Effects of Heteroskedasticity and Leveraged Data in Small Samples

With the violation of the assumption of homoskedasticity, least squares estimators of the variance become inefficient and statistical inference conducted with invalid standard errors leads to misleading rejection rates. Despite a vast cross-sectional literature on the downward bias of robust standard errors, the problem is not extensively covered in the panel data framework. We investigate the consequences of the simultaneous presence of small sample size, heteroskedasticity and data points that exhibit extreme values in the covariates ('good leverage points') on the statistical inference. Focusing on one-way linear panel data models, we examine asymptotic and finite sample properties of a battery of heteroskedasticity-consistent estimators using Monte Carlo simulations. We also propose a hybrid estimator of the variance-covariance matrix. Results show that conventional standard errors are always dominated by more conservative estimators of the variance, especially in small samples. In addition, all types of HC standard errors have excellent performances in terms of size and power tests under homoskedasticity.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2023

Gender Segregation: Analysis across Sectoral-Dominance in the UK Labour Market

This paper aims to evaluate how changing patterns of sectoral gender segregation play a role in accounting for women's employment contracts and wages in the UK between 2005 and 2020. We then study wage differentials in gender-specific dominated sectors. We found that the propensity of women to be distributed differently across sectors is a major factor contributing to explaining the differences in wages and contract opportunities. Hence, the disproportion of women in female-dominated sectors implies contractual features and lower wages typical of that sector, on average, for all workers. This difference is primarily explained by "persistent discriminatory constraints", while human capital-related characteristics play a minor role. However, wage differentials would shrink if workers had the same potential and residual wages as men in male-dominated sectors. Moreover, this does not happen at the top of the wage distribution, where wage differentials among women working in female-dominated sectors are always more pronounced than those of men.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2023

Influence Analysis with Panel Data

The presence of units with extreme values in the dependent and/or independent variables (i.e., vertical outliers, leveraged data) has the potential to severely bias regression coefficients and/or standard errors. This is common with short panel data because the researcher cannot advocate asymptotic theory. Example include cross-country studies, cell-group analyses, and field or laboratory experimental studies, where the researcher is forced to use few cross-sectional observations repeated over time due to the structure of the data or research design. Available diagnostic tools may fail to properly detect these anomalies, because they are not designed for panel data. In this paper, we formalise statistical measures for panel data models with fixed effects to quantify the degree of leverage and outlyingness of units, and the joint and conditional influences of pairs of units. We first develop a method to visually detect anomalous units in a panel data set, and identify their type. Second, we investigate the effect of these units on LS estimates, and on other units' influence on the estimated parameters. To illustrate and validate the proposed method, we use a synthetic data set contaminated with different types of anomalous units. We also provide an empirical example.

econ.EM↗