arXiv subjects

Anne Presanis

Publications and source records attributed to Anne Presanis.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2022

Trends in COVID-19 hospital outcomes in England before and after vaccine introduction, a cohort study

Widespread vaccination campaigns have changed the landscape for COVID-19, vastly altering symptoms and reducing morbidity and mortality. We estimate trends in mortality by month of admission and vaccination status among those hospitalised with COVID-19 in England between March 2020 to September 2021, controlling for demographic factors and hospital load. Among 259,727 hospitalised COVID-19 cases, 51,948 (20.0%) experienced mortality in hospital. Hospitalised fatality risk ranged from 40.3% (95% confidence interval 39.4-41.3%) in March 2020 to 8.1% (7.2-9.0%) in June 2021. Older individuals and those with multiple co-morbidities were more likely to die or else experienced longer stays prior to discharge. Compared to unvaccinated people, the hazard of hospitalised mortality was 0.71 (0.67-0.77) with a first vaccine dose, and 0.56 (0.52-0.61) with a second vaccine dose. Compared to hospital load at 0-20% of the busiest week, the hazard of hospitalised mortality during periods of peak load (90-100%), was 1.23 (1.12-1.34). The prognosis for people hospitalised with COVID-19 in England has varied substantially throughout the pandemic and according to case-mix, vaccination, and hospital load. Our estimates provide an indication for demands on hospital resources, and the relationship between hospital burden and outcomes.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2022

A comparison of two frameworks for multi-state modelling, applied to outcomes after hospital admissions with COVID-19

We compare two multi-state modelling frameworks that can be used to represent dates of events following hospital admission for people infected during an epidemic. The methods are applied to data from people admitted to hospital with COVID-19, to estimate the probability of admission to ICU, the probability of death in hospital for patients before and after ICU admission, the lengths of stay in hospital, and how all these vary with age and gender. One modelling framework is based on defining transition-specific hazard functions for competing risks. A less commonly used framework defines partially-latent subpopulations who will experience each subsequent event, and uses a mixture model to estimate the probability that an individual will experience each event, and the distribution of the time to the event given that it occurs. We compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two frameworks, in the context of the COVID-19 example. The issues include the interpretation of the model parameters, the computational efficiency of estimating the quantities of interest, implementation in software and assessing goodness of fit. In the example, we find that some groups appear to be at very low risk of some events, in particular ICU admission, and these are best represented by using "cure-rate" models to define transition-specific hazards. We provide general-purpose software to implement all the models we describe in the "flexsurv" R package, which allows arbitrarily-flexible distributions to be used to represent the cause-specific hazards or times to events.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Quantifying efficiency gains of innovative designs of two-arm vaccine trials for COVID-19 using an epidemic simulation model

Clinical trials of a vaccine during an epidemic face particular challenges, such as the pressure to identify an effective vaccine quickly to control the epidemic, and the effect that time-space-varying infection incidence has on the power of a trial. We illustrate how the operating characteristics of different trial design elements may be evaluated using a network epidemic and trial simulation model, based on COVID-19 and individually randomised two-arm trials with a binary outcome. We show that "ring" recruitment strategies, prioritising participants at high risk of infection, can result in substantial improvement in terms of power, if sufficiently many contacts of observed cases are at high risk. In addition, we introduce a novel method to make more efficient use of the data from the earliest cases of infection observed in the trial, whose infection may have been too early to be vaccine-preventable. Finally, we compare several methods of response-adaptive randomisation, discussing their advantages and disadvantages in this two-arm context and identifying particular adaptation strategies that preserve power and estimation properties, while slightly reducing the number of infections, given an effective vaccine.

q-bio.PE↗

arXiv2017

Quantifying the recency of HIV infection using multiple longitudinal biomarkers

Knowledge of the time at which an HIV-infected individual seroconverts, when the immune system starts responding to HIV infection, plays a vital role in the design and implementation of interventions to reduce the impact of the HIV epidemic. A number of biomarkers have been developed to distinguish between recent and long-term HIV infection, based on the antibody response to HIV. To quantify the recency of infection at an individual level, we propose characterising the growth of such biomarkers from observations from a panel of individuals with known seroconversion time, using Bayesian mixed effect models. We combine this knowledge of the growth patterns with observations from a newly diagnosed individual, to estimate the probability seroconversion occurred in the X months prior to diagnosis. We explore, through a simulation study, the characteristics of different biomarkers that affect our ability to estimate recency, such as the growth rate. In particular, we find that predictive ability is improved by using joint models of two biomarkers, accounting for their correlation, rather than univariate models of single biomarkers.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2017

Value of Information: Sensitivity Analysis and Research Design in Bayesian Evidence Synthesis

Suppose we have a Bayesian model which combines evidence from several different sources. We want to know which model parameters most affect the estimate or decision from the model, or which of the parameter uncertainties drive the decision uncertainty. Furthermore we want to prioritise what further data should be collected. These questions can be addressed by Value of Information (VoI) analysis, in which we estimate expected reductions in loss from learning specific parameters or collecting data of a given design. We describe the theory and practice of VoI for Bayesian evidence synthesis, using and extending ideas from health economics, computer modelling and Bayesian design. The methods are general to a range of decision problems including point estimation and choices between discrete actions. We apply them to a model for estimating prevalence of HIV infection, combining indirect information from several surveys, registers and expert beliefs. This analysis shows which parameters contribute most of the uncertainty about each prevalence estimate, and provides the expected improvements in precision from collecting specific amounts of additional data.

stat.AP↗