arXiv subjects

Annette Lutz

Publications and source records attributed to Annette Lutz.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Incremental Submodular Maximization: Better Than Greedy

We consider submodular maximization under increasing cardinality constraint and ask for a good incremental solution, i.e., an ordering of the ground set such that each prefix of the ordering yields a good solution for its respective cardinality. A classical result in this setting is that the greedy algorithm achieves a competitive ratio, i.e., an approximation guarantee across all cardinalities, of $\mathrm{e}/(\mathrm{e}-1) \approx 1.582$. No better general guarantee was previously known. We present an adaptive scaling algorithm achieving a competitive ratio of $1.373$. We complement our result by a deterministic lower bound of $1.25$ on the best possible competitive ratio for incremental submodular maximization.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Incremental-Decremental Maximization

We introduce a framework for incremental-decremental maximization that captures the gradual transformation or renewal of infrastructures. In our model, an initial solution is transformed one element at a time and the utility of an intermediate solution is given by the sum of the utilities of the transformed and untransformed parts. We propose a simple randomized and a deterministic algorithm that both find an order in which to transform the elements while maintaining a large utility during all stages of transformation, relative to an optimum solution for the current stage. More specifically, our algorithms yield competitive solutions for utility functions of bounded curvature and/or generic submodularity ratio, and, in particular, for submodular functions, and gross substitute functions. Our results exhibit that incremental-decremental maximization is substantially more difficult than incremental maximization.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Symmetry classes of Hamiltonian cycles

We initiate the study of Hamiltonian cycles up to symmetries of the underlying graph. Our focus lies on the extremal case of Hamiltonian-transitive graphs, i.e., Hamiltonian graphs where, for every pair of Hamiltonian cycles, there is a graph automorphism mapping one cycle to the other. This generalizes the extensively studied uniquely Hamiltonian graphs. In this paper, we show that Cayley graphs of abelian groups are not Hamiltonian-transitive (under some mild conditions and some non-surprising exceptions), i.e., they contain at least two structurally different Hamiltonian cycles. To show this, we reduce Hamiltonian-transitivity to properties of the prime factors of a Cartesian product decomposition, which we believe is interesting in its own right. We complement our results by constructing infinite families of regular Hamiltonian-transitive graphs and take a look at the opposite extremal case by constructing a family with many different Hamiltonian cycles up to symmetry.

math.CO↗

arXiv2025

Valid Cuts for the Design of Potential-based Flow Networks

The construction of a cost minimal network for flows obeying physical laws is an important problem for the design of electricity, water, hydrogen, and natural gas infrastructures. We formulate this problem as a mixed-integer non-linear program with potential-based flows. The non-convexity of the constraints stemming from the potential-based flow model together with the binary variables indicating the decision to build a connection make these programs challenging to solve. We develop a novel class of valid inequalities on the fractional relaxations of the binary variables. Further, we show that this class of inequalities can be separated in polynomial time for solutions to a fractional relaxation. This makes it possible to incorporate these inequalities into a branch-and-cut framework. The advantage of these inequalities is lastly demonstrated in a computational study on the design of real-world gas transport networks.

math.OC↗

arXiv2024

Bicriterial Approximation for the Incremental Prize-Collecting Steiner-Tree Problem

We consider an incremental variant of the rooted prize-collecting Steiner-tree problem with a growing budget constraint. While no incremental solution exists that simultaneously approximates the optimum for all budgets, we show that a bicriterial $(\alpha,\mu)$-approximation is possible, i.e., a solution that with budget $B+\alpha$ for all $B \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ is a multiplicative $\mu$-approximation compared to the optimum solution with budget $B$. For the case that the underlying graph is a tree, we present a polynomial-time density-greedy algorithm that computes a $(\chi,1)$-approximation, where $\chi$ denotes the eccentricity of the root vertex in the underlying graph, and show that this is best possible. An adaptation of the density-greedy algorithm for general graphs is $(\gamma,2)$-competitive where $\gamma$ is the maximal length of a vertex-disjoint path starting in the root. While this algorithm does not run in polynomial time, it can be adapted to a $(\gamma,3)$-competitive algorithm that runs in polynomial time. We further devise a capacity-scaling algorithm that guarantees a $(3\chi,8)$-approximation and, more generally, a $\smash{\bigl((4\ell - 1)\chi, \frac{2^{\ell + 2}}{2^{\ell}-1}\bigr)}$-approximation for every fixed $\ell \in \mathbb{N}$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Minor Embedding in Broken Chimera and Pegasus Graphs is NP-complete

The embedding is an essential step when calculating on the D-Wave machine. In this work we show the hardness of the embedding problem for both types of existing hardware, represented by the Chimera and the Pegasus graphs, containing unavailable qubits. We construct certain broken Chimera graphs, where it is hard to find a Hamiltonian cycle. As the Hamiltonian cycle problem is a special case of the embedding problem, this proves the general complexity result for the Chimera graphs. By exploiting the subgraph relation between the Chimera and the Pegasus graphs, the proof is then further extended to the Pegasus graphs.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Fractionally Subadditive Maximization under an Incremental Knapsack Constraint

We consider the problem of maximizing a fractionally subadditive function under a knapsack constraint that grows over time. An incremental solution to this problem is given by an order in which to include the elements of the ground set, and the competitive ratio of an incremental solution is defined by the worst ratio over all capacities relative to an optimum solution of the corresponding capacity. We present an algorithm that finds an incremental solution of competitive ratio at most $\max\{3.293\sqrt{M},2M\}$, under the assumption that the values of singleton sets are in the range $[1,M]$, and we give a lower bound of $\max\{2.618,M\}$ on the attainable competitive ratio. In addition, we establish that our framework captures potential-based flows between two vertices, and we give a lower bound of $\max\{2,M\}$ and an upper bound of $2M$ for the incremental maximization of classical flows with capacities in $[1,M]$ which is tight for the unit capacity case.

cs.DS↗