SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Anoop Krishna

Publications and source records attributed to Anoop Krishna.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Accurate parameter inference for the Light-cone Epoch of Reionization 21-cm signal

The light-cone (LC) effect introduces line-of-sight (LoS) statistical inhomogeneity into the 21-cm signal. Consequently, the traditional power spectrum (PS) fails to capture the full two-point statistical information. The evolving power spectrum (ePS), $P_e(k, z)$, offers an alternative that accounts for this LoS evolution. We compare the statistical power of three different summary statistics: the standard cylindrical PS $P(k_\perp,k_\parallel)$, slice-wise PS $P_s(k, z)$ (3D PS for small bandwidth LC slices), and ePS $P_e(k, z)$. We first demonstrate that $P_e(k,z)$ successfully recovers the benchmark 3D PS of coeval simulations across most $k$ and $z$, whereas the slice-wise PS recovers only at large $k$. To efficiently perform parameter inference, we train artificial neural network (ANN) emulators on $500$ LC 21-cm signals. Our forecasts incorporate cosmic variance, estimated using $50$ statistically independent realizations of the signal, alongside SKA-Low system noise for integration times of $1000$ and $104$ hrs. We find that ePS outperforms its peers, yielding $3$ and $1.4$ times tighter constraints than $P(k_\perp,k_\parallel)$ and $P_s(k,z)$, respectively. Our results establish the ePS as an optimal summary statistic for interpreting forthcoming data.

astro-ph.CO

Constraining the neutral hydrogen fraction during reionization: Cross-simulation inference using power spectrum and bispectrum

The redshifted 21-cm signal is a unique probe of the early universe, particularly the Epoch of Reionization (EoR). While the 21-cm power spectrum has been the primary statistic for parameter inference, it fails to capture the non-Gaussian information in the signal, motivating the use of higher-order statistics such as the bispectrum. We perform a rigorous cross-simulation validation to infer the mean neutral hydrogen fraction ($\bar{x}_{\mathrm{H\,I}}$) by training a neural network on 21cmFAST simulations and applying it to mock observations generated by the ReionYuga code. We first benchmark the framework in an idealized 21cmFAST-only setting before applying it to the more rigorous ReionYuga--21cmFAST cross-simulation case. Our analysis spans six redshifts and includes realistic SKA system noise and cosmic variance, calculated from 50 statistically independent realizations. In the same-code case, the bispectrum yields substantially tighter constraints, whereas in the cross-simulation case the improvement is moderate, with constraints tightened by $\sim 1.4\times$ relative to the power spectrum-only case. The cross-simulation analysis also identifies a persistent systematic discrepancy between inferred and true values that often exceeds the statistical uncertainties, implying that modeling uncertainty remains the dominant limitation. Our results, therefore, indicate that the highly stringent constraints obtained in same-code validation studies may be overly optimistic, and mitigating cross-model systematics is crucial for robust parameter inference in the SKA era.

astro-ph.CO

Radio evolution of a Type IIb supernova SN 2016gkg

We present extensive radio monitoring of a type IIb supernova (SN IIb), SN 2016gkg during $t \sim$ 8$-$1429 days post explosion at frequencies $\nu \sim$ 0.33$-$25 GHz. The detailed radio light curves and spectra are broadly consistent with self-absorbed synchrotron emission due to the interaction of the SN shock with the circumstellar medium. The model underpredicts the flux densities at $t \sim$ 299 days post-explosion by a factor of 2, possibly indicating a density enhancement in the CSM due to a non-uniform mass-loss from the progenitor. Assuming a wind velocity $v_{\rm w} \sim$ 200 km s$^{-1}$, we estimate the mass-loss rate to be $\dot{M} \sim$ (2.2, 3.6, 3.8, 12.6, 3.7, and 5.0) $\times$ 10$^{-6}$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ during $\sim$ 8, 15, 25, 48, 87, and 115 years, respectively before the explosion. The shock wave from SN 2016gkg is expanding from $R \sim$ 0.5 $\times$ 10$^{16}$ to 7 $\times$ 10$^{16}$ cm during $t \sim$ 24$-$492 days post-explosion indicating a shock deceleration index, $m$ $\sim$ 0.8 ($R \propto t^m$), and mean shock velocity $v \sim$ 0.1c. The radio data being inconsistent with free-free absorption model and higher shock velocities are in support of a relatively compact progenitor for SN 2016gkg.

astro-ph.HE