arXiv subjects

Antonio J. Gil

Publications and source records attributed to Antonio J. Gil.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: A monotonic approach

We apply physics-augmented neural network (PANN) constitutive models to experimental uniaxial tensile data of rubber-like materials whose behavior depends on manufacturing parameters. For this, we conduct experimental investigations on a 3D printed digital material at different mix ratios and consider several datasets from literature, including Ecoflex at different Shore hardness and a photocured 3D printing material at different grayscale values. We introduce a parametrized hyperelastic PANN model which can represent material behavior at different manufacturing parameters. The proposed model fulfills common mechanical conditions of hyperelasticity. In addition, the hyperelastic potential of the proposed model is monotonic in isotropic isochoric strain invariants of the right Cauchy-Green tensor. In incompressible hyperelasticity, this is a relaxed version of the ellipticity (or rank-one convexity) condition. Using this relaxed ellipticity condition, the PANN model has enough flexibility to be applicable to a wide range of materials while having enough structure for a stable extrapolation outside the calibration data. The monotonic PANN yields excellent results for all materials studied and can represent a wide range of largely varying qualitative and quantitative stress behavior. Although calibrated on uniaxial tensile data only, it leads to a stable numerical behavior of 3D finite element simulations. The findings of our work suggest that monotonicity could play a key role in the formulation of very general yet robust and stable constitutive models applicable to materials with highly nonlinear and parametrized behavior.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2024

Generalised tangent stabilised nonlinear elasticity: An automated framework for controlling material and geometric instabilities

Tangent stabilised large strain isotropic elasticity was recently proposed by Poya et al. [1] wherein by working directly with principal stretches the entire eigenstructure of constitutive and geometric/initial stiffness terms were found in closed-form, giving fresh insights into exact convexity conditions of highly non-convex functions in discrete settings. Consequently, owing to these tangent eigenvalues an analytic tangent stabilisation was proposed bypassing incumbent numerical approaches routinely used in nonlinear finite element analysis. This formulation appears to be extremely robust for quasi-static simulation of complex deformations even with no load increments and time stepping while still capturing instabilities automatically in ways that are infeasible for path-following techniques in practice. In this work, we generalise the notion of tangent stabilised elasticity to virtually all known invariant formulations of nonlinear elasticity. We show that, closed-form eigen-decomposition of tangents is easily available irrespective of invariant formulation or integrity basis. In particular, we work out closed-form tangent eigensystems for isotropic Total Lagrangian deformation gradient (F )-based and right Cauchy-Green (C)-based as well as Updated Lagrangian left Cauchy-Green (b)-based formulations and present their exact convexity conditions postulated in terms of their corresponding tangent and initial stiffness eigenvalues. In addition, we introduce the notion of geometrically stabilised polyconvex large strain elasticity for models that are materially stable but exhibit geometric instabilities for whom we construct their initial stiffness in a spectrally-decomposed form analytically. We further extend this framework to the case of transverse isotropy where once again, closed-form tangent eigensystems are found for common transversely isotropic invariants.

physics.comp-ph↗

arXiv2023

A systematic comparison between Membrane, Shell, and 3D Solid formulations for non-linear vascular biomechanics

Typical computational techniques for vascular biomechanics represent the blood vessel wall via either a membrane, a shell, or a 3D solid element. Each of these formulations has its trade offs concerning accuracy, ease of implementation, and computational costs. Despite the widespread use of these formulations, a systematic comparison on the performance and accuracy of these formulations for nonlinear vascular biomechanics is lacking. Therefore, the decision regarding the optimal choice often relies on intuition or previous experience, with unclear consequences of choosing one approach over the other. Here, we present a systematic comparison among three different formulations to represent vessel wall: (i) a nonlinear membrane model, (ii) a nonlinear, rotation-free shell model, and (iii) a nonlinear 3D solid model. For the 3D solid model, we consider two different implementations employing linear and quadratic interpolation. We present comparison results in both idealized and subject-specific mouse geometries. For the idealized cylindrical geometry, we compare our results against the axisymmetric solution for three different wall thickness to radius ratio. Subsequently, a comparison of these approaches is presented in an idealized bifurcation model for regionally varying wall thickness. Lastly, we present the comparison results for a subject-specific mouse geometry with regionally varying material properties and wall thickness, while incorporating the effect of external tissue surrounding the vessel wall.

physics.bio-ph↗