arXiv subjects

Anuj Dawar

Publications and source records attributed to Anuj Dawar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Preservation Theorems in Semiring Semantics

We study the status of preservation theorems such as the {\L}o\'s-Tarski theorem and the homomorphism preservation theorem in the context of semiring semantics. Semiring semantics has its origins in the provenance analysis of database queries. Depending on the underlying semiring, it allows us to track which atomic facts are responsible for the truth of a statement or practical information about the evaluation such as costs or confidence. The systematic development of semiring semantics for first-order logic and other logical systems raises the question to what extent classical model-theoretic results can be generalised to this setting and how such results depend on the underlying semiring. The definitions of semantic properties such as preservation under extensions, substructures, or homomorphisms naturally generalise to the setting of semiring semantics. However, the status of the corresponding preservation theorem strongly depends on the algebraic properties of the particular semirings. We prove that these preservation theorems do indeed hold for all lattice semirings (a quite large class, encompassing practically relevant semirings and in particular all min-max semirings). The proofs combine adaptations of the classical compactness and amalgamation methods with specific reduction methods for logical entailment that have been developed in semiring semantics. On the other side, variants of the existential preservation theorem fail for many other semirings, including the tropical semiring, the Viterbi semiring, the {\L}ukasiewicz semiring, and the natural semiring. Surprisingly, the existential preservation theorem does hold for finite interpretations in a number of semirings, including all lattice semirings. Thus, the situation for these semirings is in sharp contrast to the Boolean case, where the {\L}o\'s-Tarski theorem holds in general, but not in the finite.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Logical aspects of isomorphism of controllable graphs and cospectrality of distance-regularized graphs

We consider isomorphism of controllable graphs and cospectrality of distance-regularized graphs (which are known to be distance-regular or distance-biregular) in relation to logical definability. While most characterizations of these equivalence relations for such graph classes are of algebraic and spectral flavor, here we inject tools from first-order logic, extending and unifying several existing results.

math.CO↗

arXiv2026

Complexity of Satisfiability in Kochen-Specker Partial Boolean Algebras

The Kochen-Specker no-go theorem established that hidden-variable theories in quantum mechanics necessarily admit contextuality. This theorem is formally stated in terms of the partial Boolean algebra structure of projectors on a Hilbert space. Each partial Boolean algebra provides a semantics for interpreting propositional logic. In this paper, we examine the complexity of propositional satisfiablity for various classes of partial Boolean algebras. We first show that the satisfiability problem for the class of non-trivial partial Boolean algebras is NP-complete. Next, we consider the satisfiability problem for the class of partial Boolean algebras arising from projectors on finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. For real Hilbert spaces of dimension greater 2 and any complex Hilbert spaces of dimension greater than 3, we demonstrate that the satisfiablity problem is complete for the existential theory of the reals. Interestingly, the proofs of these results make use of Kochen-Specker sets as gadgets. As a corollary, we conclude that deciding quantum homomorphism in these fixed dimensions are also complete for the existential theory of the reals. Finally, we show that the satisfiability problems for the class of all Hilbert spaces and all finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces is undecidable.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Arity hierarchies for quantifiers closed under partial polymorphisms

We investigate the expressive power of generalized quantifiers closed under partial polymorphism conditions motivated by the study of constraint satisfaction problems. We answer a number of questions arising from the work of Dawar and Hella (CSL 2024) where such quantifiers were introduced. For quantifiers closed under partial near-unanimity polymorphisms, we establish hierarchy results clarifying the interplay between the arity of the polymorphisms and of the quantifiers: The expressive power of $(\ell+1)$-ary quantifiers closed under $\ell$-ary partial near-unanimity polymorphisms is strictly between the class of all quantifiers of arity $\ell-1$ and $\ell$. We also establish an infinite hierarchy based on the arity of quantifiers with a fixed arity of partial near-unanimity polymorphisms. Finally, we prove inexpressiveness results for quantifiers with a partial Maltsev polymorphism. The separation results are proved using novel algebraic constructions in the style of Cai-F\"urer-Immerman and the quantifier pebble games of Dawar and Hella (2024).

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Characterizing NC1 with Typed Monoids

Krebs et al. (2007) gave a characterization of the complexity class TC0 as the class of languages recognized by a certain class of typed monoids. The notion of typed monoid was introduced to extend methods of algebraic automata theory to infinite monoids and hence characterize classes beyond the regular languages. We advance this line of work beyond TC0 by giving a characterization of NC1. This is obtained by first showing that NC1 can be defined as the languages expressible in an extension of first-order logic using only unary quantifiers over regular languages. The expressibility result is a consequence of a general result showing that finite monoid multiplication quantifiers of higher dimension can be replaced with unary quantifiers in the context of interpretations over strings, which also answers a question of Lautemann et al. (2001). We establish this collapse result for a much more general class of interpretations using results on interpretations due to Boja\'nczyk et al. (2019), which may be of independent interest.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Symmetric Proofs in the Ideal Proof System

We consider the Ideal Proof System (IPS) introduced by Grochow and Pitassi and pose the question of which tautologies admit symmetric proofs, and of what complexity. The symmetry requirement in proofs is inspired by recent work establishing lower bounds in other symmetric models of computation. We link the existence of symmetric IPS proofs to the expressive power of logics such as fixed-point logic with counting and Choiceless Polynomial Time, specifically regarding the graph isomorphism problem. We identify relationships and tradeoffs between the symmetry of proofs and other parameters of IPS proofs such as size, degree and linearity. We study these on a number of standard families of tautologies from proof complexity and finite model theory such as the pigeonhole principle, the subset sum problem and the Cai-F\"urer-Immerman graphs, exhibiting non-trivial upper bounds on the size of symmetric IPS proofs.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Undefinability of Approximation of 2-to-2 Games

Recent work by Atserias and Dawar (J. Log. Comp 2019) and Tucker-Foltz (LMCS 2024) has established undefinability results in fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) corresponding to many classical complexity results from the hardness of approximation. In this line of work, NP-hardness results are turned into unconditional FPC undefinability results. We extend this work by showing the FPC undefinability of any constant factor approximation of weighted 2-to-2 games, based on the NP-hardness results of Khot, Minzer and Safra. Our result shows that the completely satisfiable 2-to-2 games are not FPC-separable from those that are not epsilon-satisfiable, for arbitrarily small epsilon. The perfect completeness of our inseparability is an improvement on the complexity result, as the NP-hardness of such a separation is still only conjectured. This perfect completeness enables us to show the FPC undefinability of other problems whose NP-hardness is conjectured. In particular, we are able to show that no FPC formula can separate the 3-colourable graphs from those that are not t-colourable, for any constant t.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Symmetric Algebraic Circuits and Homomorphism Polynomials

The central open question of algebraic complexity is whether VP is unequal to VNP, which is saying that the permanent cannot be represented by families of polynomial-size algebraic circuits. For symmetric algebraic circuits, this has been confirmed by Dawar and Wilsenach (2020, 2025) who showed exponential lower bounds on the size of symmetric circuits for the permanent. In this work, we set out to develop a more general symmetric algebraic complexity theory. Our main result is that a family of symmetric polynomials admits small symmetric circuits if and only if they can be written as a linear combination of homomorphism counting polynomials of graphs of bounded treewidth. We also establish a relationship between the symmetric complexity of subgraph counting polynomials and the vertex cover number of the pattern graph. As a concrete example, we examine the symmetric complexity of immanant families (a generalisation of the determinant and permanent) and show that a known conditional dichotomy due to Curticapean (2021) holds unconditionally in the symmetric setting.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Homomorphism Counts to Trees

We construct a pair of non-isomorphic, bipartite graphs which are not distinguished by counting the number of homomorphisms to any tree. This answers a question motivated by Atserias et al. (LICS 2021). In order to establish the construction, we analyse the equivalence relations induced by counting homomorphisms to trees of diameter two and three and obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for two graphs to be equivalent. We show that three is the optimal diameter for our construction.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2024

Preservation theorems on sparse classes revisited

We revisit the work studying homomorphism preservation for first-order logic in sparse classes of structures initiated in [Atserias et al., JACM 2006] and [Dawar, JCSS 2010]. These established that first-order logic has the homomorphism preservation property in any sparse class that is monotone and addable. It turns out that the assumption of addability is not strong enough for the proofs given. We demonstrate this by constructing classes of graphs of bounded treewidth which are monotone and addable but fail to have homomorphism preservation. We also show that homomorphism preservation fails on the class of planar graphs. On the other hand, the proofs of homomorphism preservation can be recovered by replacing addability by a stronger condition of amalgamation over bottlenecks. This is analogous to a similar condition formulated for extension preservation in [Atserias et al., SiCOMP 2008].

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Descriptive complexity of controllable graphs

Let $G$ be a graph on $n$ vertices with adjacency matrix $A$, and let $\mathbf{1}$ be the all-ones vector. We call $G$ controllable if the set of vectors $\mathbf{1}, A\mathbf{1}, \dots, A^{n-1}\mathbf{1}$ spans the whole space $\mathbb{R}^n$. We characterize the isomorphism problem of controllable graphs in terms of other combinatorial, geometric and logical problems. We also describe a polynomial time algorithm for graph isomorphism that works for almost all graphs.

math.CO↗

arXiv2023

Quantifiers closed under partial polymorphisms

We study Lindstrom quantifiers that satisfy certain closure properties which are motivated by the study of polymorphisms in the context of constraint satisfaction problems (CSP). When the algebra of polymorphisms of a finite structure B satisfies certain equations, this gives rise to a natural closure condition on the class of structures that map homomorphically to B. The collection of quantifiers that satisfy closure conditions arising from a fixed set of equations are rather more general than those arising as CSP. For any such conditions P, we define a pebble game that delimits the distinguishing power of the infinitary logic with all quantifiers that are P-closed. We use the pebble game to show that the problem of deciding whether a system of linear equations is solvable in Z2 is not expressible in the infinitary logic with all quantifiers closed under a near-unanimity condition.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Monadic NIP in monotone classes of relational structures

We prove that for any monotone class of finite relational structures, the first-order theory of the class is NIP in the sense of stability theory if, and only if, the collection of Gaifman graphs of structures in this class is nowhere dense. This generalises to relational structures a result previously known for graphs and answers an open question posed by Adler and Adler (2014). The result is established by the application of Ramsey-theoretic techniques and shows that the property of being NIP is highly robust for monotone classes. We also show that the model-checking problem for first-order logic is intractable on any class of monotone structures that is not (monadically) NIP. This is a contribution towards the conjecture of Bonnet et al. that the hereditary classes of structures admitting fixed-parameter tractable model-checking are precisely those that are monadically NIP.

math.LO↗

arXiv2022

Descriptive complexity of the generalized spectra of graphs

Two graphs are cospectral if their respective adjacency matrices have the same multiset of eigenvalues, and generalized cospectral if they are cospectral and so are their complements. We study generalized cospectrality in relation to logical definability. We show that any pair of graphs that are elementary equivalent with respect to the three-variable counting first-order logic $C^3$ are generalized cospectral, and this is not the case with $C^2$, nor with any number of variables if we exclude counting quantifiers. Using this result we provide a new characterization of the well-known class of distance-regular graphs using the logic $C^3$. We also show that, for controllable graphs (it is known that almost all graphs are controllable), the elementary equivalence in $C^2$ coincides with isomorphism.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Limitations of the Invertible-Map Equivalences

This note draws conclusions that arise by combining two recent papers, by Anuj Dawar, Erich Gr\"adel, and Wied Pakusa, published at ICALP 2019 and by Moritz Lichter, published at LICS 2021. In both papers, the main technical results rely on the combinatorial and algebraic analysis of the invertible-map equivalences $\equiv^\text{IM}_{k,Q}$ on certain variants of Cai-F\"urer-Immerman (CFI) structures. These $\equiv^\text{IM}_{k,Q}$-equivalences, for a number $k$ and a set of primes~$Q$, refine the well-known Weisfeiler-Leman equivalences used in algorithms for graph isomorphism. The intuition is that two graphs $G\equiv^\text{IM}_{k,Q}H$ cannot be distinguished by iterative refinements of equivalences on $k$-tuples defined via linear operators on vector spaces over fields of characteristic $p \in Q$. In the first paper it has been shown, using considerable algebraic machinery, that for a prime $q \notin Q$, the $\equiv^\text{IM}_{k,Q}$ equivalences do not distinguish between non-isomorphic CFI-structures over the field $\mathbb{F}_q$. In the second paper, a similar but not identical construction for CFI-structures over the rings $\mathbb{Z}_{2^i}$ has, again by rather involved combinatorial and algebraic arguments, been shown to be indistinguishable with respect to $\equiv^\text{IM}_{k,\{2\}}$. Together with earlier work, this second result separates rank logic from polynomial time. We unify the two approaches and prove that CFI-structures over the rings $\mathbb{Z}_{2^i}$ are indistinguishable with respect to $\equiv^\text{IM}_{k,\mathbb{P}}$, for the set $\mathbb{P}$ of all primes. This implies the following two results. 1. There is no fixed $k$ such that the invertible-map equivalence $\equiv^\text{IM}_{k,\mathbb{P}}$ coincides with isomorphism on all finite graphs. 2. No extension of fixed-point logic by linear-algebraic operators over fields can capture polynomial time.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Lower Bounds for Symmetric Circuits for the Determinant

Dawar and Wilsenach (ICALP 2020) introduce the model of symmetric arithmetic circuits and show an exponential separation between the sizes of symmetric circuits for computing the determinant and the permanent. The symmetry restriction is that the circuits which take a matrix input are unchanged by a permutation applied simultaneously to the rows and columns of the matrix. Under such restrictions we have polynomial-size circuits for computing the determinant but no subexponential size circuits for the permanent. Here, we consider a more stringent symmetry requirement, namely that the circuits are unchanged by arbitrary even permutations applied separately to rows and columns, and prove an exponential lower bound even for circuits computing the determinant. The result requires substantial new machinery. We develop a general framework for proving lower bounds for symmetric circuits with restricted symmetries, based on a new support theorem and new two-player restricted bijection games. These are applied to the determinant problem with a novel construction of matrices that are bi-adjacency matrices of graphs based on the CFI construction. Our general framework opens the way to exploring a variety of symmetry restrictions and studying trade-offs between symmetry and other resources used by arithmetic circuits.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2021

Separating LREC from LFP

LREC= is an extension of first-order logic with a logarithmic recursion operator. It was introduced by Grohe et al. and shown to capture the complexity class L over trees and interval graphs. It does not capture L in general as it is contained in FPC - fixed-point logic with counting. We show that this containment is strict. In particular, we show that the path systems problem, a classic P-complete problem which is definable in LFP - fixed-point logic - is not definable in LREC= This shows that the logarithmic recursion mechanism is provably weaker than general least fixed points. The proof is based on a novel Spoiler-Duplicator game tailored for this logic.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Lov\'asz-Type Theorems and Game Comonads

Lov\'asz (1967) showed that two finite relational structures A and B are isomorphic if, and only if, the number of homomorphisms from C to A is the same as the number of homomorphisms from C to B for any finite structure C. Soon after, Pultr (1973) proved a categorical generalisation of this fact. We propose a new categorical formulation, which applies to any locally finite category with pushouts and a proper factorisation system. As special cases of this general theorem, we obtain two variants of Lov\'asz' theorem: the result by Dvo\v{r}\'ak (2010) that characterises equivalence of graphs in the k-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman equivalence by homomorphism counts from graphs of tree-width at most k, and the result of Grohe (2020) characterising equivalence with respect to first-order logic with counting and quantifier depth k in terms of homomorphism counts from graphs of tree-depth at most k. The connection of our categorical formulation with these results is obtained by means of the game comonads of Abramsky et al. We also present a novel application to homomorphism counts in modal logic.

cs.LO↗