SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Anushka Debnath

Publications and source records attributed to Anushka Debnath.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluating LLM Alignment With Human Trust Models

Trust plays a pivotal role in enabling effective cooperation, reducing uncertainty, and guiding decision-making in both human interactions and multi-agent systems. Although it is significant, there is limited understanding of how large language models (LLMs) internally conceptualize and reason about trust. This work presents a white-box analysis of trust representation in EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B, using contrastive prompting to generate embedding vectors within the activation space of the LLM for diadic trust and related interpersonal relationship attributes. We first identified trust-related concepts from five established human trust models. We then determined a threshold for significant conceptual alignment by computing pairwise cosine similarities across 60 general emotional concepts. Then we measured the cosine similarities between the LLM's internal representation of trust and the derived trust-related concepts. Our results show that the internal trust representation of EleutherAI/gpt-j-6B aligns most closely with the Castelfranchi socio-cognitive model, followed by the Marsh Model. These findings indicate that LLMs encode socio-cognitive constructs in their activation space in ways that support meaningful comparative analyses, inform theories of social cognition, and support the design of human-AI collaborative systems.

cs.MA

Social Norm Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models: An Evaluation

In Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), agents are designed with social capabilities, allowing them to understand and reason about social concepts such as norms when interacting with others (e.g., inter-robot interactions). In Normative MAS (NorMAS), researchers study how norms develop, and how violations are detected and sanctioned. However, existing research in NorMAS use symbolic approaches (e.g., formal logic) for norm representation and reasoning whose application is limited to simplified environments. In contrast, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) present promising possibilities to develop software used by robots to identify and reason about norms in a wide variety of complex social situations embodied in text and images. However, prior work on norm reasoning have been limited to text-based scenarios. This paper investigates the norm reasoning competence of five MLLMs by evaluating their ability to answer norm-related questions based on thirty text-based and thirty image-based stories, and comparing their responses against humans. Our results show that MLLMs demonstrate superior performance in norm reasoning in text than in images. GPT-4o performs the best in both modalities offering the most promise for integration with MAS, followed by the free model Qwen-2.5VL. Additionally, all models find reasoning about complex norms challenging.

cs.MA

Can LLMs Reason About Trust?: A Pilot Study

In human society, trust is an essential component of social attitude that helps build and maintain long-term, healthy relationships which creates a strong foundation for cooperation, enabling individuals to work together effectively and achieve shared goals. As many human interactions occur through electronic means such as using mobile apps, the potential arises for AI systems to assist users in understanding the social state of their relationships. In this paper we investigate the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason about trust between two individuals in an environment which requires fostering trust relationships. We also assess whether LLMs are capable of inducing trust by role-playing one party in a trust based interaction and planning actions which can instil trust.

cs.HC

Evaluating Large Language Models for Automatic Register Transfer Logic Generation via High-Level Synthesis

The ever-growing popularity of large language models (LLMs) has resulted in their increasing adoption for hardware design and verification. Prior research has attempted to assess the capability of LLMs to automate digital hardware design by producing superior-quality Register Transfer Logic (RTL) descriptions, particularly in Verilog. However, these tests have revealed that Verilog code production using LLMs at current state-of-the-art lack sufficient functional correctness to be practically viable, compared to automatic generation of programs in general-purpose programming languages such as C, C++, Python, etc. With this as the key insight, in this paper we assess the performance of a two-stage software pipeline for automated Verilog RTL generation: LLM based automatic generation of annotated C++ code suitable for high-level synthesis (HLS), followed by HLS to generate Verilog RTL. We have benchmarked the performance of our proposed scheme using the open-source VerilogEval dataset, for four different industry-scale LLMs, and the Vitis HLS tool. Our experimental results demonstrate that our two-step technique substantially outperforms previous proposed techniques of direct Verilog RTL generation by LLMs in terms of average functional correctness rates, reaching score of 0.86 in pass@1 metric.

cs.AR