arXiv subjects

Ariel Stulman

Publications and source records attributed to Ariel Stulman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Signing the Transaction but Not the Decision: Whisper Attacks and a Binding Defense for AP2

Software agents are beginning to shop and pay on a person's behalf. Agent payment protocols such as AP2 produce cryptographically valid signatures for completed purchases, yet do not constrain the decisions that lead to them. Consequently, ordinary product-description text can steer a shopping agent into forming a cart that passes every protocol check but no longer matches the user's request. In this paper, we show that this vulnerability enables three related attacks. In the first attack, the agent is steered into fetching another user's payment credentials. In the second, it assembles a cryptographically valid cart whose contents do not match what the user was shown. In the third, a single factual claim about stock or product lineage moves the agent from the cheaper displayed item to a more expensive one, while the resulting cart remains fully consistent with the listing. In experiments using the Gemini Flash-Lite models that AP2's sample agents specify by default, the three attacks succeeded at rates of 90%, 56%, and 73.3%, respectively. The same vulnerability appears across seventeen Google models, three unrelated agent frameworks, two cross-vendor anchors, and Google's own consumer assistant. To address this attack vector, we introduce A-VIP (AP2 Verified-Intent Protection), a protocol-layer defense that treats the signed intent as a capability grant rather than judging the merchant's description. The defense binds every credential lookup to the session that requested it and every cart line to the listing seen, while flagging unauthorized spending. The first two attacks leave structural traces that these bindings block with zero false positives. The third attack leaves no trace, so A-VIP surfaces unauthorized spending for user confirmation. Finally, we release the A-VIP code, machine-checked invariants, and AP2-WhisperBench, a suite of 1,544 evaluation scenarios.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Passive Reconnaissance of Routing-Layer Defenses in OLSR-Based MANETs using ML

Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) based on proactive routing protocols such as OLSR, remain vulnerable to routing-layer attacks. While prior work has focused primarily on attack detection, the problem of identifying deployed defenses has received comparatively little attention. This work examines whether a routing-layer defense leaves detectable signatures in network traffic. The evaluated fictive mitigation mechanism operates entirely within standard OLSR control traffic and introduces no new packet types, making passive detection inherently difficult. Using ns-3 simulations across baseline, attack-only, defense-only, and combined attack-defense regimes under both static and mobile conditions, we derive features from observable routing dynamics and control-plane activity available to a passive attacker. Despite the restricted observability available to the adversary, the results show that defense detection remains feasible in this setting. Ensemble models achieve in-domain accuracy up to $0.91$ (AUC $0.96$). Cross-domain generalization is asymmetric: models trained on static data degrade under mobility ($\approx 0.67$), whereas mobile-trained models transfer more robustly ($\approx 0.84$). Restricting the model to a compact invariant feature subset of four metrics yields near-symmetric cross-domain transfer ($\approx 0.86$ in both directions). Further analysis shows that the cross-domain gap reflects both reduced class separability and decision-threshold transfer, with the latter largely recoverable through limited target-domain calibration. These findings indicate that the evaluated defense mechanism leaves a detectable statistical footprint in passively observable routing behavior, providing adversaries with a potential reconnaissance capability in protected MANET deployments.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Security Analysis of Agentic AI Communication Protocols: A Comparative Evaluation

Multi-agent systems (MAS) powered by artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly foundational to complex, distributed workflows. Yet, the security of their underlying communication protocols remains critically under-examined. This paper presents the first empirical, comparative security analysis of the official CORAL implementation and a high-fidelity, SDK-based ACP implementation, benchmarked against a literature-based evaluation of A2A. Using a 14 point vulnerability taxonomy, we systematically assess their defenses across authentication, authorization, integrity, confidentiality, and availability. Our results reveal a pronounced security dichotomy: CORAL exhibits a robust architectural design, particularly in its transport-layer message validation and session isolation, but suffers from critical implementation-level vulnerabilities, including authentication and authorization failures at its SSE gateway. Conversely, ACP's architectural flexibility, most notably its optional JWS enforcement, translates into high-impact integrity and confidentiality flaws. We contextualize these findings within current industry trends, highlighting that existing protocols remain insufficiently secure. As a path forward, we recommend a hybrid approach that combines CORAL's integrated architecture with ACP's mandatory per-message integrity guarantees, laying the groundwork for resilient, next-generation agent communications.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

Improving Google A2A Protocol: Protecting Sensitive Data and Mitigating Unintended Harms in Multi-Agent Systems

Googles A2A protocol provides a secure communication framework for AI agents but demonstrates critical limitations when handling highly sensitive information such as payment credentials and identity documents. These gaps increase the risk of unintended harms, including unauthorized disclosure, privilege escalation, and misuse of private data in generative multi-agent environments. In this paper, we identify key weaknesses of A2A: insufficient token lifetime control, lack of strong customer authentication, overbroad access scopes, and missing consent flows. We propose protocol-level enhancements grounded in a structured threat model for semi-trusted multi-agent systems. Our refinements introduce explicit consent orchestration, ephemeral scoped tokens, and direct user-to-service data channels to minimize exposure across time, context, and topology. Empirical evaluation using adversarial prompt injection tests shows that the enhanced protocol substantially reduces sensitive data leakage while maintaining low communication latency. Comparative analysis highlights the advantages of our approach over both the original A2A specification and related academic proposals. These contributions establish a practical path for evolving A2A into a privacy-preserving framework that mitigates unintended harms in multi-agent generative AI systems.

cs.CR↗