SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Arnab Mallick

Publications and source records attributed to Arnab Mallick.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Adaptive Black-Box Exactness Barriers for Nearest-Source Girth Estimation in CONGEST

Recent multi-scale nearest-source methods give polynomially sublinear approximations for girth in the CONGEST model. We study exactification by adaptive black-box composition while preserving the same fresh exchangeable source-selection primitive. Our scalar-oracle model exposes the sampled source identities and the scalar estimate from every call, allows arbitrary persistent controller state, adaptive source cardinalities and capacities, adaptive stopping, and an arbitrary final decoder; the internal nearest-source tables remain encapsulated. We first construct, for infinitely many $n$, a same-size pair $G_t^0,G_t^1$ of maximum-degree-three, logarithmic-diameter graphs whose girths are distinct and both $\Theta(\log n)$. A length-transfer construction makes every bulk source contribute identically on the two graphs. The scalar transcripts can separate the pair only when one of $O(\log n)$ interface sources survives a linear nearest-source rank competition. Coupling the adaptive executions with a conditional permutation-rank bound yields an $\Omega(n/\log n)$ expected retained-source workload requirement for constant exactness probability, even with arbitrary final decoding. For the standard sequential packetized realization, the same scale is an expected-round barrier. A complementary bridgeless family $\widehat H_t$ shows the same $\Omega(n/\log n)$ direct-retuning barrier on bounded-degree graphs with minimum degree at least two, no bridges, and $2$-core equal to the whole graph. Finally, under a known promise $g\ge h$, one full-source call from $\Theta(n/h)$ uniformly sampled sources computes exact girth with constant probability in $O(n/h+D)$ rounds, matching the $n/g$ source scale.

cs.DS

Brief Announcement: Fair Binding for Hidden-State Authorization in Byzantine SMR

Validated Byzantine SMR assumes that replicas can evaluate the validity of an ordered command. Agent authorization creates a different regime: a command may be valid only relative to a committed policy state that validators cannot reconstruct from the log. A proof that an action was authorized at an old commitment is then only a historical attestation, it does not by itself reserve the hidden resource for later use. We isolate two independent requirements for safe live allocation of a hidden consumable resource under a Byzantine leader. First, arrival order at correct replicas must constrain commit order, the gap addressed by fair-ordering protocols. Second, a committed first request must bind later validity: it must make conflicting later requests invalid, not merely record that the first request was once authorized. The second requirement is non-vacuous precisely because the current policy state is hidden and not prefix-recoverable. Using an explicit authorization-witness interface, we characterize the two distinct obligations in this one-shot reservation model and give a fair reserve/use protocol satisfying both authorization safety and first-arrival liveness. Under trusted FIFO admission the two requirements collapse because admission and execution are atomic, Byzantine SMR separates request commitment from use.

cs.DC

Conditional Reliability of Toxicity Signals for Multilingual and Code-Mixed Abuse Detection

Moderation systems increasingly rely on external toxicity tools, but those tools are unreliable under code-mixing, transliteration, slang, and language mismatch. We study the \emph{conditional reliability} of toxicity priors in Indian multilingual and code-mixed short text: English toxicity, Indic abuse, and rule-based severity cues can be useful evidence, but only in some linguistic and abuse-severity contexts. We propose ToxGate, a trust-fusion head that conditions each auxiliary signal on the encoder representation before adding it to the prediction state. Across three short-text abuse datasets, four transformer encoders, and five seeds per setting, ToxGate improves over matched plain encoders in 10 of 12 in-domain settings and 7 of 8 transfer settings. The largest and most interpretable gains occur in high-risk moderation slices, including explicit slurs, violent threats, and cross-dataset transfer. The broader lesson is that moderation systems should treat external toxicity tools and priors as conditional evidence rather than fixed features or ground truth, in focused ablations, source-specific gating gives the strongest results in transfer, severe-abuse slices, and high-risk triage.

cs.CL

SPEAR: An Engineering Case Study of Multi-Agent Coordination for Smart Contract Auditing

We present SPEAR, a multi-agent coordination framework for smart contract auditing that applies established MAS patterns in a realistic security analysis workflow. SPEAR models auditing as a coordinated mission carried out by specialized agents: a Planning Agent prioritizes contracts using risk-aware heuristics, an Execution Agent allocates tasks via the Contract Net protocol, and a Repair Agent autonomously recovers from brittle generated artifacts using a programmatic-first repair policy. Agents maintain local beliefs updated through AGM-compliant revision, coordinate via negotiation and auction protocols, and revise plans as new information becomes available. An empirical study compares the multi-agent design with centralized and pipeline-based alternatives under controlled failure scenarios, focusing on coordination, recovery behavior, and resource use.

cs.MA

{\mu}ACP: A Formal Calculus for Expressive, Resource-Constrained Agent Communication

Agent communication remains a foundational problem in multi-agent systems: protocols such as FIPA-ACL guarantee semantic richness but are intractable for constrained environments, while lightweight IoT protocols achieve efficiency at the expense of expressiveness. This paper presents $\mu$ACP, a formal calculus for expressive agent communication under explicit resource bounds. We formalize the Resource-Constrained Agent Communication (RCAC) model, prove that a minimal four-verb basis \textit{\{PING, TELL, ASK, OBSERVE\}} is suffices to encode finite-state FIPA protocols, and establish tight information-theoretic bounds on message complexity. We further show that $\mu$ACP can implement standard consensus under partial synchrony and crash faults, yielding a constructive coordination framework for edge-native agents. Formal verification in TLA$^{+}$ (model checking) and Coq (mechanized invariants) establishes safety and boundedness, and supports liveness under modeled assumptions. Large-scale system simulations confirm ACP achieves a median end-to-end message latency of 34 ms (95th percentile 104 ms) at scale, outperforming prior agent and IoT protocols under severe resource constraints. The main contribution is a unified calculus that reconciles semantic expressiveness with provable efficiency, providing a rigorous foundation for the next generation of resource-constrained multi-agent systems.

cs.MA