SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Arne Mooers

Publications and source records attributed to Arne Mooers.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Properties of biodiversity indices that incorporate future extinction risk

The loss of biodiversity due to the likely widespread extinction of species in the near future is a focus of current concern in conservation biology. One approach to measure the impact of this extinction is based on the predicted loss of phylogenetic diversity. These predictions have become a focus of the Zoological Society of London's `EDGE2' program for quantifying biodiversity loss and involves considering the HED (heightened evolutionary distinctiveness) and HEDGE (heightened evolutionary distinctiveness and globally endangered) indices which are based on phylogenetic diversity on a tree. Here, we show how to generalise the HED(GE) indices by expanding their application to more general settings (to phylogenetic networks, to feature diversity on discrete traits, and to arbitrary biodiversity measures). We provide a simple and explicit description of the mean and, importantly, the variance of such measures, and illustrate our results by an application to the phylogeny and a small set of features for all 27 extant Crocodilians.

q-bio.PE

Phylogeny-based metrics of biodiversity: concepts and methods

The concept of valuing evolutionary history has a long tradition and was formalized by several research groups in the early 1990s, each aiming to capture the products of evolution more comprehensively than species richness alone. Preserving the "Tree of Life" has since become a central, if sometimes contested, goal in conservation biology. Faith's phylogenetic diversity (PD), defined as the sum of the edge lengths of a rooted tree connecting a set of focal entities, is the most widely used metric in this context and underpins an extensive methodological framework. This framework includes widely used species-specific indices such as EDGE, as well as approaches that quantify expected species-specific contributions to PD such as EDGE2. This chapter focuses on the development of this framework of phylogeny-based conservation metrics. We review the development of species-specific indices, highlighting their strengths and limitations, and trace their progression from simple formulations to game-theoretic approaches and more abstract generalizations. We also discuss how these indices are applied in conservation practice, with particular emphasis on the EDGE framework. We further discuss the relationship between the edge lengths of a phylogeny and the evolutionary features they are intended to represent. Finally, we highlight recent advances in the field and identify areas for future research.

q-bio.PE

Branch lengths on Yule trees and the expected loss of phylogenetic diversity

Diversification is nested, and early models suggested this could lead to a great deal of evolutionary redundancy in the Tree of Life. This result is based on a particular set of branch lengths produced by the common coalescent, where pendant branches leading to tips can be very short compared to branches deeper in the tree. Here, we analyze alternative and more realistic Yule and birth-death models. We show how censoring at the present both makes average branches one half what we might expect and makes pendant and interior branches roughly equal in length. Although dependent on whether we condition on the size of the tree, its age, or both, these results hold both for the Yule model and for birth-death models with moderate extinction. Importantly, the rough equivalency in interior and exterior branch lengths means the loss of evolutionary history with loss of species can be roughly linear. Under these models, the Tree of Life may offer limited redundancy in the face of ongoing species loss.

q-bio.PE

Expected length of pendant and interior edges of a Yule tree

The Yule (pure-birth) model is the simplest null model of speciation; each lineage gives rise to a new lineage independently with the same rate $λ$. We investigate the expected length of an edge chosen at random from the resulting evolutionary tree. In particular, we compare the expected length of a randomly selected edge with the expected length of a randomly selected pendant edge. We provide some exact formulae, and show how our results depend slightly on whether the depth of the tree or the number of leaves is conditioned on, and whether $λ$ is known or is estimated using maximum likelihood.

q-bio.PE