arXiv subjects

Arran Zeyu Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Arran Zeyu Wang.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Multimodal Data Comprehension: Understanding How Visual-Textual Chains of Information Influence Data Interpretation

Visualizations and text often work together to support effective data communication. Despite this common paradigm, we know little about how the interplay of these modalities affects people's data comprehension. We present a novel experimental paradigm to investigate multimodal data comprehension---the process of people comprehending information from multimodal visual and textual data---across both crowdsourced and think-aloud environments. Our methodology employs two sequential chains for presenting multimodal information---a visualization-first chain and a text-first chain---asking people to describe the data presented iteratively. By comparing how people's data comprehension changes across the chain, we can assess the information contribution of each modality and how they shape subsequent comprehension. We found that the visualization-first chain facilitates exploratory comprehension with hypothesis-driven discovery, whereas the text-first chain yields confirmatory comprehension akin to framing effects where visualizations serve to reinforce and confirm observations drawn from text. Our findings provide empirical insights into multimodal information integration, with implications for designing more effective data-driven communication.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

How Does Title Framing Influence Pattern Identification in Line Charts?

Visual data communication in digital media is increasingly characterized by short attention spans and snapshot-based viewing, often employing line charts to convey trends and patterns. Among all visual elements, titles are crucial elements that can shape how viewers interpret visual information and form chart takeaways. In this study, we examine how title characteristics, particularly title word count and intended message, influence people's pattern identification in single-class line charts. Participants viewed 50 line charts collected from online news media and identified the pattern they perceived. Our results demonstrate that both title word count and intended message significantly influence viewers' pattern identification. Our findings highlight the importance of title framing in shaping quick-view pattern takeaways and supporting effective visualization communication.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Quick-View Takeaways: How Does Title Framing Influences Pattern Identification in Line Charts?

Visual data communication in digital media is increasingly characterized by short attention spans and snapshot-based viewing, often employing line charts to convey trends and patterns. Among all visual elements, titles are crucial ones that can shape how viewers interpret visual information and form chart takeaways. In this study, we examine how title characteristics, particularly title word count and intended message, influence people's pattern identification in single-class line charts. Participants viewed 50 line charts collected from online news media and identified the pattern they perceived. Our results demonstrate that both title word count and intended message significantly influence viewers' pattern identification. Our findings highlight the importance of title design in shaping chart takeaways and effective visualization communication.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

CatPAL: Task-Aware Learning for Categorical Palette Recommendation

Designing effective categorical palettes requires balancing a range of factors, including perceptual distinctiveness, category count, and task effectiveness. The effectiveness of categorical encodings can vary substantially depending on the target analytical tasks; however, existing recommendation tools largely ignore task context when evaluating palette quality, resulting in inconsistent performance across tasks. We synthesize findings from a series of multi-stage user studies into a unified model of task-based effectiveness for color encodings, shape encodings, and their redundant combination across category counts and seven common scatterplot tasks. Our results show that task and palette choice jointly influence perceptual accuracy: different color and shape palettes exhibit varying levels of robustness across tasks, indicating that palette effectiveness is task-dependent. We estimate task-specific perceptual strengths for 39 colors and 39 shapes using Bradley-Terry models, refined through adaptive sampling to target uncertain and task-sensitive comparisons. We further quantify cross-channel interactions using a redundant gain Delta G metric to model performance across color and shape pairings. We then train a predictive model that scores candidate palettes based on task, category count, and perceptual features. This model drives effective palette recommendations in CatPAL, a task-aware palette recommendation system grounded in empirical data responsive to user constraints. Our findings highlight the importance of selecting categorical palettes aligned with specific analytical tasks and demonstrate how task-aware modeling enables more reliable palette design. CatPAL translates empirical results into a practical tool that supports user-specified colors or shapes and returns ranked palette recommendations adaptable to a range of tasks.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Contextualization or Rationalization? The Effect of Causal Priors on Data Visualization Interpretation

Understanding how individuals interpret charts is a crucial concern for visual data communication. This imperative has motivated a number of studies, including past work demonstrating that causal priors -- a priori beliefs about causal relationships between concepts -- can have significant influences on the perceived strength of variable relationships inferred from visualizations. This paper builds on these previous results, demonstrating that causal priors can also influence the types of patterns that people perceive as the most salient within ambiguous scatterplots that have roughly equal evidence for trend and cluster patterns. Using a mixed-design approach that combines a large-scale online experiment for breadth of findings with an in-person think-aloud study for analytical depth, we investigated how users' interpretations are influenced by the interplay between causal priors and the visualized data patterns. Our analysis suggests two archetypal reasoning behaviors through which people often make their observations: contextualization, in which users accept a visual pattern that aligns with causal priors and use their existing knowledge to enrich interpretation, and rationalization, in which users encounter a pattern that conflicts with causal priors and attempt to explain away the discrepancy by invoking external factors, such as positing confounding variables or data selection bias. These findings provide initial evidence highlighting the critical role of causal priors in shaping high-level visualization comprehension, and introduce a vocabulary for describing how users reason about data that either confirms or challenges prior beliefs of causality.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Redundant is Not Redundant: Automating Efficient Categorical Palette Design Unifying Color & Shape Encodings with CatPAW

Colors and shapes are commonly used to encode categories in multi-class scatterplots. Designers often combine the two channels to create redundant encodings, aiming to enhance class distinctions. However, evidence for the effectiveness of redundancy remains conflicted, and guidelines for constructing effective combinations are limited. This paper presents four crowdsourced experiments evaluating redundant color-shape encodings and identifying high-performing configurations across different category numbers. Results show that redundancy significantly improves accuracy in assessing class-level correlations, with the strongest benefits for 5-8 categories. We also find pronounced interaction effects between colors and shapes, underscoring the need for careful pairing in designing redundant encodings. Drawing on these findings, we introduce a categorical palette design tool that enables designers to construct empirically grounded palettes for effective categorical visualization. Our work advances understanding of categorical perception in data visualization by systematically identifying effective redundant color-shape combinations and embedding these insights into a practical palette design tool.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Screen Reader Programmers in the Vibe Coding Era: Adaptation, Empowerment, and New Accessibility Landscape

Generative AI agents are reshaping human-computer interaction, shifting users from direct task execution to supervising machine-driven actions, especially the rise of "vibe coding" in programming. Yet little is known about how screen reader programmers interact with AI code assistants in practice. We conducted a longitudinal study with 16 blind and low-vision programmers. Participants completed a GitHub Copilot tutorial, engaged with a programming task, and provided initial feedback. After two weeks of AI-assisted programming, follow-ups examined how their practices and perceptions evolved. Our findings show that code assistants enhanced programming efficiency and bridged accessibility gaps. However, participants struggled to convey intent, interpret AI outputs, and manage multiple views while maintaining situational awareness. They showed diverse preferences for accessibility features, expressed a need to balance automation with control, and encountered barriers when learning to use these tools. Furthermore, we propose design principles and recommendations for more accessible and inclusive human-AI collaborations.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Graphical Perception of Icon Arrays versus Bar Charts for Value Comparisons in Health Risk Communication

Visualizations support critical decision making in domains like health risk communication. This is particularly important for those at higher health risks and their care providers, allowing for better risk interpretation which may lead to more informed decisions. However, the kinds of visualizations used to represent data may impart biases that influence data interpretation and decision making. Both continuous representations using bar charts and discrete representations using icon arrays are pervasive in health risk communication, but express the same quantities using fundamentally different visual paradigms. We conducted a series of studies to investigate how bar charts, icon arrays, and their layout (juxtaposed, explicit encoding, explicit encoding plus juxtaposition) affect the perception of value comparison and subsequent decision-making in health risk communication. Our results suggest that icon arrays and explicit encoding combined with juxtaposition can optimize for both accurate difference estimation and perceptual biases in decision making. We also found misalignment between estimation accuracy and decision making, as well as between low and high literacy groups, emphasizing the importance of tailoring visualization approaches to specific audiences and evaluating visualizations beyond perceptual accuracy alone. This research contributes empirically-grounded design recommendations to improve comparison in health risk communication and support more informed decision-making across domains.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Visual Analytics for Causal Reasoning from Real-World Health Data

The increasing capture and analysis of large-scale longitudinal health data offer opportunities to improve healthcare and advance medical understanding. However, a critical gap exists between (a) -- the observation of patterns and correlations, versus (b) -- the understanding of true causal mechanisms that drive outcomes. An accurate understanding of the underlying mechanisms that cause various changes in medical status is crucial for decision-makers across various healthcare domains and roles, yet inferring causality from real-world observational data is difficult for both methodological and practical challenges. This Grand Challenge advocates increased Visual Analytics (VA) research on this topic to empower people with the tool for sound causal reasoning from health data. We note this is complicated by the complex nature of medical data -- the volume, variety, sparsity, and temporality of health data streams make the use of causal inference algorithms difficult. Combined with challenges imposed by the realities of health-focused settings, including time constraints and traditional medical work practices, existing causal reasoning approaches are valuable but insufficient. We argue that advances in research can lead to new VA tools that augment human expertise with intuitive and robust causal inference capabilities, which can help realize a new paradigm of data-driven, causality-aware healthcare practices that improve human health outcomes.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Characterizing Visualization Perception with Psychological Phenomena: Uncovering the Role of Subitizing in Data Visualization

Understanding how people perceive visualizations is crucial for designing effective visual data representations; however, many heuristic design guidelines are derived from specific tasks or visualization types, without considering the constraints or conditions under which those guidelines hold. In this work, we aimed to assess existing design heuristics for categorical visualization using well-established psychological knowledge. Specifically, we examine the impact of the subitizing phenomenon in cognitive psychology -- people's ability to automatically recognize a small set of objects instantly without counting -- in data visualizations. We conducted three experiments with multi-class scatterplots -- between 2 and 15 classes with varying design choices -- across three different tasks -- class estimation, correlation comparison, and clustering judgments -- to understand how performance changes as the number of classes (and therefore set size) increases. Our results indicate if the category number is smaller than six, people tend to perform well at all tasks, providing empirical evidence of subitizing in visualization. When category numbers increased, performance fell, with the magnitude of the performance change depending on task and encoding. Our study bridges the gap between heuristic guidelines and empirical evidence by applying well-established psychological theories, suggesting future opportunities for using psychological theories and constructs to characterize visualization perception.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Striking the Right Balance: Systematic Assessment of Evaluation Method Distribution Across Contribution Types

In the rapidly evolving field of information visualization, rigorous evaluation is essential for validating new techniques, understanding user interactions, and demonstrating the effectiveness and usability of visualizations. Faithful evaluations provide valuable insights into how users interact with and perceive the system, enabling designers to identify potential weaknesses and make informed decisions about design choices and improvements. However, an emerging trend of multiple evaluations within a single research raises critical questions about the sustainability, feasibility, and methodological rigor of such an approach. New researchers and students, influenced by this trend, may believe -- multiple evaluations are necessary for a study, regardless of the contribution types. However, the number of evaluations in a study should depend on its contributions and merits, not on the trend of including multiple evaluations to strengthen a paper. So, how many evaluations are enough? This is a situational question and cannot be formulaically determined. Our objective is to summarize current trends and patterns to assess the distribution of evaluation methods over different paper contribution types. In this paper, we identify this trend through a non-exhaustive literature survey of evaluation patterns in 214 papers in the two most recent years' VIS issues in IEEE TVCG from 2023 and 2024. We then discuss various evaluation strategy patterns in the information visualization field to guide practical choices and how this paper will open avenues for further discussion.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Beyond Correlation: Incorporating Counterfactual Guidance to Better Support Exploratory Visual Analysis

Providing effective guidance for users has long been an important and challenging task for efficient exploratory visual analytics, especially when selecting variables for visualization in high-dimensional datasets. Correlation is the most widely applied metric for guidance in statistical and analytical tools, however a reliance on correlation may lead users towards false positives when interpreting causal relations in the data. In this work, inspired by prior insights on the benefits of counterfactual visualization in supporting visual causal inference, we propose a novel, simple, and efficient counterfactual guidance method to enhance causal inference performance in guided exploratory analytics based on insights and concerns gathered from expert interviews. Our technique aims to capitalize on the benefits of counterfactual approaches while reducing their complexity for users. We integrated counterfactual guidance into an exploratory visual analytics system, and using a synthetically generated ground-truth causal dataset, conducted a comparative user study and evaluated to what extent counterfactual guidance can help lead users to more precise visual causal inferences. The results suggest that counterfactual guidance improved visual causal inference performance, and also led to different exploratory behaviors compared to correlation-based guidance. Based on these findings, we offer future directions and challenges for incorporating counterfactual guidance to better support exploratory visual analytics.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Causal Priors and Their Influence on Judgements of Causality in Visualized Data

"Correlation does not imply causation" is a famous mantra in statistical and visual analysis. However, consumers of visualizations often draw causal conclusions when only correlations between variables are shown. In this paper, we investigate factors that contribute to causal relationships users perceive in visualizations. We collected a corpus of concept pairs from variables in widely used datasets and created visualizations that depict varying correlative associations using three typical statistical chart types. We conducted two MTurk studies on (1) preconceived notions on causal relations without charts, and (2) perceived causal relations with charts, for each concept pair. Our results indicate that people make assumptions about causal relationships between pairs of concepts even without seeing any visualized data. Moreover, our results suggest that these assumptions constitute causal priors that, in combination with visualized association, impact how data visualizations are interpreted. The results also suggest that causal priors may lead to over- or under-estimation in perceived causal relations in different circumstances, and that those priors can also impact users' confidence in their causal assessments. In addition, our results align with prior work, indicating that chart type may also affect causal inference. Using data from the studies, we develop a model to capture the interaction between causal priors and visualized associations as they combine to impact a user's perceived causal relations. In addition to reporting the study results and analyses, we provide an open dataset of causal priors for 56 specific concept pairs that can serve as a potential benchmark for future studies. We also suggest remaining challenges and heuristic-based guidelines to help designers improve visualization design choices to better support visual causal inference.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Shape It Up: An Empirically Grounded Approach for Designing Shape Palettes

Shape is commonly used to distinguish between categories in multi-class scatterplots. However, existing guidelines for choosing effective shape palettes rely largely on intuition and do not consider how these needs may change as the number of categories increases. Although shapes can be a finite number compared to colors, they can not be represented by a numerical space, making it difficult to propose a general guideline for shape choices or shed light on the design heuristics of designer-crafted shape palettes. This paper presents a series of four experiments evaluating the efficiency of 39 shapes across three tasks -- relative mean judgment tasks, expert choices, and data correlation estimation. Given how complex and tangled results are, rather than relying on conventional features for modeling, we built a model and introduced a corresponding design tool that offers recommendations for shape encodings. The perceptual effectiveness of shapes significantly varies across specific pairs, and certain shapes may enhance perceptual efficiency and accuracy. However, how performance varies does not map well to classical features of shape such as angles, fill, or convex hull. We developed a model based on pairwise relations between shapes measured in our experiments and the number of shapes required to intelligently recommend shape palettes for a given design. This tool provides designers with agency over shape selection while incorporating empirical elements of perceptual performance captured in our study. Our model advances the understanding of shape perception in visualization contexts and provides practical design guidelines for advanced shape usage in visualization design that optimize perceptual efficiency.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Our Stories, Our Data: Co-designing Visualizations with People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) have unique needs and challenges when working with data. While visualization aims to make data more accessible to a broad audience, our understanding of how to design cognitively accessible visualizations remains limited. In this study, we engaged 20 participants with IDD as co-designers to explore how they approach and visualize data. Our preliminary investigation paired four participants as data pen-pals in a six-week online asynchronous participatory design workshop. In response to the observed conceptual, technological, and emotional struggles with data, we subsequently organized a two-day in-person co-design workshop with 16 participants to further understand relevant visualization authoring and sensemaking strategies. Reflecting on how participants engaged with and represented data, we propose two strategies for cognitively accessible data visualizations: transforming numbers into narratives and blending data design with everyday aesthetics. Our findings emphasize the importance of involving individuals with IDD in the design process, demonstrating their capacity for data analysis and expression, and underscoring the need for a narrative and tangible approach to accessible data visualization.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Revisiting Categorical Color Perception in Scatterplots: Sequential, Diverging, and Categorical Palettes

Existing guidelines for categorical color selection are heuristic, often grounded in intuition rather than empirical studies of readers' abilities. While design conventions recommend palettes maximize hue differences, more recent exploratory findings indicate other factors, such as lightness, may play a role in effective categorical palette design. We conducted a crowdsourced experiment on mean value judgments in multi-class scatterplots using five color palette families--single-hue sequential, multi-hue sequential, perceptually-uniform multi-hue sequential, diverging, and multi-hue categorical--that differ in how they manipulate hue and lightness. Participants estimated relative mean positions in scatterplots containing 2 to 10 categories using 20 colormaps. Our results confirm heuristic guidance that hue-based categorical palettes are most effective. However, they also provide additional evidence that scalable categorical encoding relies on more than hue variance.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Do You See What I See? A Qualitative Study Eliciting High-Level Visualization Comprehension

Designers often create visualizations to achieve specific high-level analytical or communication goals. These goals require people to naturally extract complex, contextualized, and interconnected patterns in data. While limited prior work has studied general high-level interpretation, prevailing perceptual studies of visualization effectiveness primarily focus on isolated, predefined, low-level tasks, such as estimating statistical quantities. This study more holistically explores visualization interpretation to examine the alignment between designers' communicative goals and what their audience sees in a visualization, which we refer to as their comprehension. We found that statistics people effectively estimate from visualizations in classical graphical perception studies may differ from the patterns people intuitively comprehend in a visualization. We conducted a qualitative study on three types of visualizations -- line graphs, bar graphs, and scatterplots -- to investigate the high-level patterns people naturally draw from a visualization. Participants described a series of graphs using natural language and think-aloud protocols. We found that comprehension varies with a range of factors, including graph complexity and data distribution. Specifically, 1) a visualization's stated objective often does not align with people's comprehension, 2) results from traditional experiments may not predict the knowledge people build with a graph, and 3) chart type alone is insufficient to predict the information people extract from a graph. Our study confirms the importance of defining visualization effectiveness from multiple perspectives to assess and inform visualization practices.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Using Counterfactuals to Improve Causal Inferences from Visualizations

Traditional approaches to data visualization have often focused on comparing different subsets of data, and this is reflected in the many techniques developed and evaluated over the years for visual comparison. Similarly, common workflows for exploratory visualization are built upon the idea of users interactively applying various filter and grouping mechanisms in search of new insights. This paradigm has proven effective at helping users identify correlations between variables that can inform thinking and decision-making. However, recent studies show that consumers of visualizations often draw causal conclusions even when not supported by the data. Motivated by these observations, this article highlights recent advances from a growing community of researchers exploring methods that aim to directly support visual causal inference. However, many of these approaches have their own limitations which limit their use in many real-world scenarios. This article therefore also outlines a set of key open challenges and corresponding priorities for new research to advance the state of the art in visual causal inference.

cs.HC↗