arXiv subjects

Art Hobson

Publications and source records attributed to Art Hobson.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Understanding entanglement and resolving the measurement problem

We summarize a recently proposed resolution of the quantum measurement problem. It stems from an insight into entanglement demonstrated in a 1991 experiment involving photon momenta. This experiment shows that, when two superposed quantum systems A and B are entangled, the resulting "pre-measurement state" is not a paradoxical macroscopic superposition of compound states of the two subsystems; for example, Schrodinger's cat is not "smeared" between dead and alive. It is instead a non-local superposition of correlations between states of the subsystems. In Schrodinger's example, an undecayed nucleus is correlated with a live cat, AND a decayed nucleus is correlated with a dead cat, where "AND" indicates the superposition on. This is exactly what we want. We have misinterpreted "dyads" |A> |B> where "A" and "B" are subsystems of a composite system AB. A> |B> does not mean states |A> and |B> both exist. It means instead |B> exists if and only |A> exists, i.e. |A> and |B> are correlated. It is a fact of nature that such correlations are nonlocally coherent: The degree of correlation between A and B depends on the nonlocal phase angle between the arbitrarily distant subsystems. Such coherent correlations are central to the nonlocal collapse of wave functions.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Re-assessment of the state of Schroedinger's cat, final version

The quantum state of Schroedinger's cat is usually incorrectly described as a superposition of "dead" and "alive," despite an argument by Rinner and Werner that, locally, the cat should be considered to be in a mixture of non-superposed states. Here, it is rigorously proven that the cat is not in a superposition. This is central to the measurement problem. Nonlocal two-photon interferometry experiments throw further light on the measurement state by probing the effect of a variable phase factor inserted between its superposed terms. These experiments demonstrate that both subsystems really are in locally mixed states rather than superpositions, and they tell us what the measurement state superposition actually superposes. They show that measurement transfers the coherence in Schroedinger's nuclear superposition neither to the cat nor to the nucleus, but only to the correlations between them. This explains the collapse process--but not its subsequent irreversible dissipation--within the context of unitary dynamics with no need for external entities such as the environment, a human mind, other worlds, or collapse mechanisms.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Two-photon interferometry illuminates quantum measurements

The quantum measurement problem still finds no consensus. Nonlocal interferometry provides an unprecedented experimental probe by entangling two photons in the "measurement state" (MS). The experiments show that each photon "measures" the other; the resulting entanglement decoheres both photons; decoherence collapses both photons to unpredictable but definite outcomes; and the two-photon MS continues evolving coherently. Thus, contrary to common opinion, when a two-part system is in the MS, the outcomes actually observed at both subsystems are definite. Although standard quantum physics postulates definite outcomes, two-photon interferometry verifies them to be not only consistent with, but actually a prediction of, the other principles. Nonlocality is the key to understanding this. As a consequence of nonlocality, the states we actually observe are the local states. These actually-observed local states collapse, while the global MS, which can be "observed" only after the fact by collecting coincidence data from both subsystems, continues its unitary evolution. This conclusion implies a refined understanding of the eigenstate principle: Following a measurement, the actually-observed local state instantly jumps into the observed eigenstate. Various experts' objections are rebutted.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Why decoherence solves the measurement problem

Although the solution, within standard quantum physics, of the problem of outcomes has been published several times, many authors continue to treat measurement as an unsolved fundamental dilemma. The solution lies in the formation of entangled subsystems, the non-local nature of the measurement state, and the resulting distinction between mixed-state local outcomes and the pure-state global outcome. Upon "measurement" (i.e. entanglement), the quantum system and its measurement apparatus both decohere and collapse into local mixed states while the unitarily-evolving global state remains coherent and un-collapsed. The states we observe are the local, collapsed states. Considerable experimental evidence supports this conclusion. Theoretical objections to this conclusion are rebutted, and a new perspective on measurement and entanglement is noted.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Resolving the problem of definite outcomes of measurements

The heart of the measurement puzzle, namely the problem of definite outcomes, remains unresolved. This paper shows that Josef Jauch's 1968 reduced density operator approach is the solution, even though many question it: The entangled "Measurement State" implies local mixtures of definite but indeterminate eigenvalues even though the MS continues evolving unitarily. A second, independent, argument based on the quantum's nonlocal entanglement with its measuring apparatus shows that the outcomes must be definite eigenvalues because of relativity's ban on instant signaling. Experiments with entangled photon pairs show the MS to be a non-paradoxical superposition of correlations between states rather than a "Schrodinger's cat" superposition of states. Nature's measurement strategy is to shift the superposition--the coherence--from the detected quantum to the correlations between the quantum and its detector, allowing both subsystems to collapse locally to mixtures of definite eigenvalues. This solution implies an innocuous revision of the standard eigenvalue-eigenstate link. Three frequent objections to this solution are rebutted.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Resolving the problem of definite outcomes of measurements

The entangled "Schrodinger's cat state" of a quantum and its measurement apparatus is not a paradoxical superposition of states but is instead a non-paradoxical superposition of nonlocal coherent correlations between states: An un-decayed nucleus is correlated with a live cat, and a decayed nucleus is correlated with a dead cat. This elucidation of entanglement is demonstrated by quantum-theoretical analysis and by experiments performed in 1990 using entangled photon pairs. Thus the cat state does not predict a dead-and-alive cat. Instead of indefinite superpositions, it predicts mixtures of definite eigenvalues even though the subsystems are not actually in the corresponding eigenstates, a situation that implies a (trivial) revision of the standard eigenvalue-eigenstate rule. Because the subsystem states are not mixed even though the subsystem eigenvalues are mixed, this analysis avoids two common objections to such a resolution, namely improper density operators and basis ambiguity. Thus, entanglement transfers coherence from the superposed quantum to correlations between the quantum and its measuring apparatus, permitting instantaneous collapse without interrupting the global unitary evolution. This resolves a key part of the measurement problem.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Resolving Schrodinger's cat

Schrodinger's famous cat has long been misunderstood. According to quantum theory and experiments with entangled systems, an entangled state such as the Schrodinger's cat state is neither a superposition of states of either subsystem nor a superposition of compound states of the composite system, but rather a nonlocal superposition of correlations between pairs of states of the two subsystems. The entangled post-measurement state that results from an ideal measurement is not paradoxical, but is merely a coherent superposition of two statistical correlations at "zero phase angle," i.e. at 100% positive correlation. Thus the state of the radioactive nucleus and Schrodinger's cat is as follows: an undecayed nucleus is 100% positively correlated with an alive cat, and (i.e. superposed with) a decayed nucleus is 100% positively correlated with a dead cat. The superposition consists merely in the fact that both correlations are simultaneously true. Despite many published statements to the contrary, this superposition is not paradoxical. It is in fact what one expects intuitively.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Solution of the problem of definite outcomes of quantum measurements

Theory and experiment both demonstrate that an entangled quantum state of two subsystems is neither a superposition of states of its subsystems nor a superposition of composite states but rather a coherent superposition of nonlocal correlations between incoherently mixed local states of the two subsystems. Thus, even if one subsystem happens to be macroscopic as in the entangled "Schrodinger's cat" state resulting from an ideal measurement, this state is not the paradoxical macroscopic superposition it is generally presumed to be. It is, instead, a "macroscopic correlation," a coherent quantum correlation in which one of the two correlated sub-systems happens to be macroscopic. This clarifies the physical meaning of entanglement: When a superposed quantum system A is unitarily entangled with a second quantum system B, the coherence of the original superposition of different states of A is transferred to different correlations between states of A and B, so the entangled state becomes a superposition of correlations rather than a superposition of states. This transfer preserves unitary evolution while permitting B to be macroscopic without entailing a macroscopic superposition. This resolves the "problem of outcomes" but is not a complete resolution of the measurement problem because the entangled state is still reversible.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Quantum realism is consistent with quantum facts

Despite the unparalleled accuracy of quantum-theoretical predictions across an enormous range of phenomena, the theory's foundations are still in doubt. The theory deviates radically from classical physics, predicts counterintuitive phenomena, and seems inconsistent. The biggest stumbling block is measurement, where the Schrodinger equation's unitary evolution seems inconsistent with collapse. These doubts have inspired a variety of proposed interpretations and alterations of the theory. Most interpretations posit the theory represents only observed appearances rather than reality. The realistic interpretations, on the other hand, posit entities such as other universes, hidden variables, artificial collapse mechanisms, or human minds, that are not found in the standard mathematical formulation. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to the possibility that the standard theory is both realistic and correct as it stands. This paper examines several controversial issues, namely quantization, field particle duality, quantum randomness, superposition, entanglement, non-locality, and measurement, to argue that standard quantum physics, realistically interpreted, is consistent with all of them.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Product states, entanglement, and measurement

A product state of a composite quantum system AB is customarily interpreted physically to mean subsystem A has property A1 and subsystem B has property B1. But this interpretation contradicts both the theory and observed outcomes of non-local interferometry experiments on the momentum-entangled state of two photons. These experiments demonstrate that product states must be interpreted physically as correlations, i.e. the product state means A has property A1 if and only if B has property B1. This clarification resolves the problem of definite outcomes and, with it, the measurement problem.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Entanglement, decoherence, and the measurement problem

The entangled Schrodinger cat state obtained immediately upon measurement of a superposed two-state quantum system is often considered paradoxical because it appears to predict two macroscopically different outcomes, such as an alive and dead cat. However, nonlocal interferometry experiments testing momentum-entangled photon pairs over all phases demonstrate that the cat state does not fit this description and is not paradoxical. Both experiment and theory imply that it instead represents a superposition of two nonlocally coherent (i.e. phase-dependent) statistical correlations between its sub-systems. This is not paradoxical. Standard quantum theory rigorously predicts the experimentally-observed outcomes of this state. Neither sub-system is superposed; rather, the correlations between the states of the subsystems are superposed. This resolves the problem of definite outcomes. The nonlocal properties of entanglement then ensure that only one outcome occurs while the other outcome simultaneously does not occur, resolving a problem posed by Einstein in 1927. The single outcome that occurs then triggers an irreversible process leading to macroscopic registration of the outcome. This resolves the quantum measurement problem. Collapse occurs because of entanglement and does not require a special collapse postulate. Collapse is a consequence of standard quantum physics and the irreversible nature of the macroscopic registration.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

The entangled measurement state is not a paradoxical superposition of the detector

The entangled state that results when a detector measures a superposed quantum system has spawned decades of concern about the problem of definite outcomes or "Schrodinger's cat." This state seems to describe a detector in an indefinite or "smeared" situation of indicating two macroscopic configurations simultaneously. This would be paradoxical. Since all entangled states are known to have nonlocal properties, and since measurements have obvious nonlocal characteristics, it's natural to turn to nonlocality experiments for insight into this question. Unlike the measurement situation where the phase is fixed at zero for perfect correlations, nonlocality experiments cover the full range of superposition phases and can thus show precisely what entangled states superpose. For two-state systems, these experiments reveal that the measurement state is not a superposition of two macroscopically different detector states but instead a superposition of two coherent correlations between distinct detector states and corresponding system states. In the measurement situation (i.e. at zero phase), and assuming the Schrodinger's cat scenario, the entangled state can be read as follows: An undecayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with an alive cat, AND a decayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with a dead cat, where "AND" indicates the superposition. This is not paradoxical.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Review and suggested resolution of the problem of Schrodinger's cat

This paper reviews and suggests a resolution of the problem of definite outcomes of measurement. This problem, also known as "Schrodinger's cat," has long posed an apparent paradox because the state resulting from a measurement appears to be a quantum superposition in which the detector is in two macroscopically distinct states (alive and dead in the case of the cat) simultaneously. Many alternative interpretations of the quantum mathematical formalism, and several alternative modifications of the theory, have been proposed to resolve this problem, but no consensus has formed supporting any one of them. Applying standard quantum theory to the measurement state, together with the analysis and results of decades of nonlocality experiments with pairs of entangled systems, this paper shows the entangled measurement state is not a paradoxical macroscopic superposition of states. It is instead a phase-dependent superposition of correlations between states of the subsystems. Thus Schrodinger's cat is a non-paradoxical "macroscopic correlation" in which one of the two correlated systems happens to be a detector. This insight resolves the problem of definite outcomes but it does not entirely resolve the measurement problem because the entangled state is still reversible.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Entanglement and the measurement problem

The entangled "measurement state" (MS), predicted by von Neumann to arise during quantum measurement, seems to display paradoxical properties such as multiple macroscopic outcomes. But analysis of interferometry experiments using entangled photon pairs shows that entangled states differ surprisingly from simple superposition states. Based on standard quantum theory, this paper shows that (i) the MS does not represent multiple detector readings but instead represents nonparadoxical multiple statistical correlations between system states and detector readings, (ii) exactly one outcome actually occurs, and (iii) when one outcome occurs, the other possible outcomes simultaneously collapse nonlocally. Point (iii) resolves an issue first raised in 1927 by Einstein who demonstrated that quantum theory requires instantaneous state collapse. This conundrum's resolution requires nonlocal correlations, which from today's perspective implies the MS must be an entangled state. Thus, contrary to previous presumed proofs of the measurement problem's insolubility, we find the MS to be the collapsed state and just what we expect upon measurement.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2019

Solving the measurement problem within standard quantum theory

A misunderstanding of entangled states has spawned decades of concern about quantum measurements and a plethora of quantum interpretations. The "measurement state" or "Schrodinger's cat state" of a superposed quantum system and its detector is nonlocally entangled, suggesting that we turn to nonlocality experiments for insight into measurements. By studying the full range of superposition phases, these experiments show precisely what the measurement state does and does not superpose. These experiments reveal that the measurement state is not, as had been supposed, a paradoxical superposition of detector states. It is instead a nonparadoxical superposition of two correlations between detector states and system states. In this way, the experimental results resolve the problem of definite outcomes ("Schrodinger's cat"), leading to a resolution of the measurement problem. However, this argument does not yet resolve the measurement problem because it is based on the results of experiments, while measurement is a theoretical problem: How can standard quantum theory explain the definite outcomes seen experimentally? Thus, we summarize the nonlocality experiments' supporting theory, which rigorously predicts the experimental results directly from optical paths. Several previous theoretical analyses of the measurement problem have relied on the reduced density operators derived from the measurement state, but these solutions have been rejected due to criticism of reduced density operators. Because it avoids reduced density operators, the optical-path analysis is immune to such criticism.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2019

Realist Analysis of Six Controversial Quantum Issues

This paper presents a philosophically realistic analysis of quantization, field-particle duality, superposition, entanglement, nonlocality, and measurement. These are logically related: Realistically understanding measurement depends on realistically understanding superposition, entanglement, and nonlocality; understanding these three depends on understanding field-particle duality and quantization. This paper resolves all six, based on a realistic view of standard quantum physics. It concludes that, for these issues, standard quantum physics is consistent with scientific practice since Copernicus: Nature exists on its own and science's goal is to understand its operating principles, which are independent of humans. Quantum theory need not be regarded as merely the study of what humans can know about the microscopic world, but can instead view it as the study of real quanta such as electrons, photons, and atoms. This position has long been argued by Mario Bunge.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2012

There are no particles, there are only fields

Quantum foundations are still unsettled, with mixed effects on science and society. By now it should be possible to obtain consensus on at least one issue: Are the fundamental constituents fields or particles? As this paper shows, experiment and theory imply unbounded fields, not bounded particles, are fundamental. This is especially clear for relativistic systems, implying it's also true of non-relativistic systems. Particles are epiphenomena arising from fields. Thus the Schroedinger field is a space-filling physical field whose value at any spatial point is the probability amplitude for an interaction to occur at that point. The field for an electron is the electron; each electron extends over both slits in the 2-slit experiment and spreads over the entire pattern; and quantum physics is about interactions of microscopic systems with the macroscopic world rather than just about measurements. It's important to clarify this issue because textbooks still teach a particles- and measurement-oriented interpretation that contributes to bewilderment among students and pseudoscience among the public. This article reviews classical and quantum fields, the 2-slit experiment, rigorous theorems showing particles are inconsistent with relativistic quantum theory, and several phenomena showing particles are incompatible with quantum field theories.

physics.hist-ph↗