SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Artyom Astashenok

Publications and source records attributed to Artyom Astashenok.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The apparent decay of pulsar magnetic fields

Neutron stars are extremely strong cosmic magnets which fields are expected to decay with time. Here we report on the simple test of this process. Adopting a novel approach, we have estimated surface magnetic fields $B$ for 76 radiopulsars (the most numerous subclass of the known isolated neutron stars) which ages $t$ are known independently. Focusing on the accurate evaluation of the precision of both quantities, we determined a significant power-law trend $B(t) \propto t^{-β}$ with index $β= 0.19^{+0.05}_{-0.06}$ at 95\% C.L. The effects of the observational selection turn this value into the upper limit for the intrinsic field decay rate. If so, then neutron star crusts are close to the "impurity-free crystals", which results in a relatively slow magnetic fields decay.

astro-ph.HE

Refinement of the timing-based estimator of pulsar magnetic fields

Numerical simulations of realistic non-vacuum magnetospheres of isolated neutron stars have shown that pulsar spin-down luminosities depend weakly on the magnetic obliquity. This result provides the opportunity to estimate the surface magnetic field for a given radiopulsar with quite a high accuracy. In the current work, we present a refinement of the classical `magneto-dipolar' formula for pulsar magnetic fields $B_{\rm md} = (3.2\times 10^{19}\mbox{ G})\sqrt{P\dot P}$, where $P$ is the neutron star spin period. The new, robust timing-based estimator is introduced as $\log B = \log B_{\rm md} + Δ_{\rm B}(M, α)$, where the correction $Δ_{\rm B}$ depends on the equation of state (EOS) of dense matter, the individual pulsar obliquity $α$ and the mass $M$. Adopting state-of-the-art statistics for $M$ and $α$ we calculate the distributions of $Δ_{\rm B}$ for a representative subset of 22 EOSs that do not contradict observations. It has been found that $Δ_{\rm B}$ is distributed nearly normally, with the average in the range -0.5 to -0.25 dex and standard deviation $σ[Δ_{\rm B}] \approx$ 0.06 to 0.09 dex, depending on the adopted EOS. The latter quantity represents a formal uncertainty of the corrected estimation of $\log B$ because $Δ_{\rm B}$ is weakly correlated with $\log B_{\rm md}$. At the same time, if it is assumed that every considered EOS has the same chance of occurring in nature, then another, more generalized, estimator $B^* \approx 3B_{\rm md}/7$ can be introduced providing an unbiased value of the pulsar surface magnetic field with $\sim$30 per cent uncertainty with 68 per cent confidence. Finally, we discuss the possible impact of pulsar timing irregularities on the timing-based estimation of $B$ and review the astrophysical applications of the obtained results.

astro-ph.HE