arXiv subjects

Arya Raeesi

Publications and source records attributed to Arya Raeesi.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Beyond Binary Priorities: Multi-Tier SLA Scheduling for Large Language Model Serving

Modern LLM serving deployments must simultaneously satisfy heterogeneous service-level objectives (SLOs) across a diverse population of user tiers, ranging from latency-critical API calls to background batch processing. Llumnix introduced a dynamic, migration-capable multi-instance scheduler for LLM inference that achieves load balancing, defragmentation, prioritization, and auto-scaling through a unified "freeness" metric. However, Llumnix's priority model is restricted to two levels (high and normal), an abstraction too coarse to express the richer SLA classes common in production deployments. In this work, we extend Llumnix's priority model to support an arbitrary number of tiers and evaluate the effects of this extension under three realistic priority distributions (uniform, Gaussian, enterprise) using Vidur, a high-fidelity LLM inference simulator. We implement per-tier headroom with exponential decay, tier-aware dispatch ordering, and the full Llumnix migration pipeline inside Vidur's hierarchical scheduling framework. We compare our extended scheduler against INFaaS (global routing baseline), vLLM, Orca, and Sarathi-Serve (per-replica baselines), sweeping priority levels from 1 to 10. Our experiments demonstrate that four priority tiers yields the best cost-effectiveness tradeoff, achieving prefill mean speedups of up to 8.3x and end-to-end P99 speedups of up to 3.1x over INFaaS with cost-per-latency improvements of 46 to 68%, while preserving strong SLO differentiation across tiers. We further show that the system sustains these gains at 10 priority levels without tail latency collapse, with overhead concentrated in the prefill phase.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

Auditing Forgetting in Limited Memory Language Models

Limited Memory Language Models (LMLMs) externalize factual knowledge to a database to enable deletion-based unlearning without retraining. Existing evaluations measure post-deletion correctness in aggregate and cannot tell whether a deleted fact persists through residual parametric memory, alternative retrieval paths, or near-neighbor retrieval artifacts. We propose a causal auditing framework that holds the model fixed and varies the database state at inference time across three interventions: FULL, DEL-ON, and DEL-OFF. The framework decomposes post-deletion behavior into parametric leakage L(f), retrieval-mediated correctness R(f), and a retrieval artifact rate grounded in the inference-time retrieval trace. We apply it to 12,228 alias-closure deletions across thirteen databases, including four adversarial topologies (Base, Alias, Noise, Collision) we construct in three domains, and six prompt formulations. Parametric leakage is near zero in every variant and every prompt style: the model rarely returns the deleted answer in the absence of retrieval. The residual that does survive lives in the retrieval graph: retrieval-mediated correctness and the retrieval artifact rate match within rounding everywhere, so post-deletion correctness is, in our audit, predominantly reconstituted from near-neighbor retrieval. This residual ranges from 0.7% on the released LMLM database to 13.6% on the most adversarial variant, and prompt formulation does not independently control how much of a deleted fact survives. These results suggest that, for this class of LMLM and deletion procedure, the unlearning boundary is drawn primarily by the database administrator rather than by the model.

cs.CL↗