arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Athanase Papadopoulos.
This is a biography of Herbert Busemann (1905--1994). The final version will appear in Volume I of the Selected Works of Herbert Busemann (2 volumes, Springer Verlag, to appear in 2017).
We survey the main ideas in the early history of the subjects on which Riemann worked and that led to some of his most important discoveries. The subjects discussed include the theory of functions of a complex variable, elliptic and Abelian integrals, the hypergeometric series, the zeta function, topology, differential geometry, integration, and the notion of space. We shall see that among Riemann's predecessors in all these fields, one name occupies a prominent place, this is Leonhard Euler. The final version of this paper will appear in the book \emph{From Riemann to differential geometry and relativity} (L. Ji, A. Papadopoulos and S. Yamada, ed.) Berlin: Springer, 2017.
This is the introduction I wrote for the multi-authored book "From Riemann to differential geometry and relativity", edited by L. Ji, A. Papadopoulos and S. Yamada (Berlin, Springer verlag, 2017). The book consists of twenty chapters, written by various authors. This introduction, besides giving the information on the content of the book, is a quick review of the topics on which Riemann worked and of the impact of this work on mathematics (topology, complex geometry, algebraic geometry, integration, trigonometric series, Riemannian geometry, etc.), philosophy and physics.
The origin of quasiconformal mappings, like that of conformal mappings, can be traced back to old cartography where the basic problem was the search for mappings from the sphere onto the plane with minimal deviation from conformality, subject to certain conditions which were made precise. In this paper, we survey the development of cartography, highlighting the main ideas that are related to quasiconformality. Some of these ideas were completely ignored in the previous historical surveys on quasiconformal mappings. We then survey early quasiconformal theory in the works of Grötzsch, Lavrentieff, Ahlfors and Teichmüller, which are the 20th-century founders of the theory. The period we consider starts with Claudius Ptolemy (c. 100--170 A.D.) and ends with Oswald Teichmüller (1913--1943). We mention the works of several mathematicians-geographers done in this period, including Euler, Lagrange, Lambert, Gauss, Chebyshev, Darboux and others. We highlight in particular the work of Nicolas-Auguste Tissot (1824--1897), a French mathematician and geographer who (according to our knowledge) was the first to introduce the notion of a mapping which transforms infinitesimal circles into infinitesimal ellipses, studying parameters such as the ratio of the major to the minor axes of such an infinitesimal ellipse, its area divided by the area of the infinitesimal circle of which it is the image, and the inclination of its axis with respect to a fixed axis in the plane. We also give some information about the lives and works of Grötzsch, Lavrentieff, Ahlfors and Teichmüller. The latter brought the theory of quasiconformal mappings to a high level of development. He used it in an essential way in his investigations of Riemann surfaces and their moduli and in function theory (in particular, in his work on the Bieberbach conjecture and the type problem). We survey in detail several of his results. We also discuss some aspects of his life and writings, explaining why his papers were not read and why some of his ideas are still unknown even to Teichmüller theorists. The final version of this paper will appear in the book "Uniformization, Riemann-Hilbert Correspondence, Calabi-Yau Manifolds, and Picard-Fuchs Equations" (ed. L. Ji and S.-T. Yau), International Press and Higher Education Press (2017).
For each right-angled hexagon in the hyperbolic plane, we construct a one-parameter family of right-angled hexagons with a Lipschitz map between any two elements in this family, realizing the smallest Lipschitz constant in the homotopy class of this map relative to the boundary. As a consequence of this construction, we exhibit new geodesics for the arc metric on the Teichm{ü}ller space of an arbitrary surface of negative Euler characteristic with nonempty boundary. We also obtain new geodesics for Thurston's metric on Teichm{ü}ller spaces of hyperbolic surfaces without boundary.
Nicolas-Auguste Tissot (1824--1897) published a series of papers on cartography in which he introduced a tool which became known later on, among geographers, under the name of the "Tissot indicatrix." This tool was broadly used during the twentieth century in the theory and in the practical aspects of the drawing of geographical maps. The Tissot indicatrix is a graphical representation of a field of ellipses on a map that describes its distortion. Tissot studied extensively, from a mathematical viewpoint, the distortion of mappings from the sphere onto the Euclidean plane that are used in drawing geographical maps, and more generally he developed a theory for the distorsion of mappings between general surfaces. His ideas are at the heart of the work on quasiconformal mappings that was developed several decades after him by Gr{ö}tzsch, Lavrentieff, Ahlfors and Teichm{ü}ller. Gr{ö}tzsch mentions the work of Tissot and he uses the terminology related to his name (in particular, Gr{ö}tzsch uses the Tissot indicatrix). Teichm{ü}ller mentions the name of Tissot in a historical section in one of his fundamental papers where he claims that quasiconformal mappings were used by geographers, but without giving any hint about the nature of Tissot's work. The name of Tissot is also missing from all the historical surveys on quasiconformal mappings. In the present paper, we report on this work of Tissot. We shall also mention some related works on cartography, on the differential geometry of surfaces, and on the theory of quasiconformal mappings. This will place Tissot's work in its proper context. The final version of this paper will appear in the journal Arch. Hist. Exact Sciences.
We prove that for every analytic curve in the complex plane, Euclidean and spherical arc-lengths are global conformal parameters. We also prove that for any analytic curve in the hyperbolic plane, hyperbolic arc-length is also a global parameter. We generalize some of these results to the case of analytic curves in Euclidean n-space and complex n-space and we discuss the situation of curves in the Riemann sphere.
This paper is a commentary and a reading guide to three papers by Herbert Busemann, Über die Geometrien, in denen die "Kreise mit unendlichem Radius" die kürzesten Linien sind." (On the geometries where circles of infinite radius are the shortest lines) (1932), "Paschsches Axiom und Zweidimensionalität," (Pasch's Axiom and Two--Dimensionality) (1933) and "Über Räume mit konvexen Kugeln und Parallelenaxiom (On spaces with convex spheres and the parallel postulate) (1933). These are the first papers that Busemann wrote on the foundations of geometry and the axiomatic characterization of Minkowski spaces (finite-dimensional normed spaces). The subject of these papers followed Busemann for the rest of his life, and the three papers already contain several ideas and techniques that he developed later on, in his work on the subject which lasted several decades. The three papers were translated into English by Annette A'Campo. These translations, together with the final version of present commentary, will be part of the forthcoming edition of Busemann's Collected Papers edition.
We report on the works of Euler and Chebyshev on the drawing of geographical maps. We point out relations with questions about the fitting of garments that were studied by Chebyshev.
The arc metric is an asymmetric metric on the Teichm{ü}ller space T(S) of a surface S with nonempty boundary. In this paper we study the relation between Thurston's compactification and the horofunction compactification of T(S) endowed with the arc metric. We prove that there is a natural homeomorphism between the two compactifications.
We comment on Teichm{ü}ller 's paper ''Vollst{ä}ndige L{ö}sung einer Extremalaufgabe der quasikonformen Abbildung'' (Complete solution of an ex-tremal problem of the quasiconformal mapping),, published in 1941. In this paper, Teichm{ü}ller gives a proof of the existence of extremal quasiconformal mappings in the case of the pentagon (disc with five distinguished points on the boundary). The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller theory.
We comment on the paper Über Extremalprobleme der konformen Geometrie (On extremal problems in conformal geometry) by Teichmüller, published in 1941. This paper contains ideas on a wide generalization of his previous work on the solution of extremal problems in conformal geometry. The generalization concerns at the same time the fields of function theory, topology and algebra. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichmüller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.
We review some ideas of Grothendieck and others on actions of the absolute Galois group Γ Q of Q (the automorphism group of the tower of finite extensions of Q), related to the geometry and topology of surfaces (mapping class groups, Teichm{ü}ller spaces and moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces). Grothendieck's motivation came in part from his desire to understand the absolute Galois group. But he was also interested in Thurston's work on surfaces, and he expressed this in his Esquisse d'un programme, his R{é}coltes et semailles and on other occasions. He introduced the notions of dessin d'enfant, Teichm{ü}ller tower, and other related objects, he considered the actions of Γ Q on them or on their etale fundamental groups, and he made conjectures on some natural homomorphisms between the absolute Galois group and the automor-phism groups (or outer automorphism groups) of these objects. We mention several ramifications of these ideas, due to various authors. We also report on the works of Sullivan and others on nonlinear actions of Γ Q , in particular in homotopy theory. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.
Grothendieck's Esquisse d'un programme is often referred to for the ideas it contains on dessins d'enfants, the Teichm{ü}ller tower, and the actions of the absolute Galois group on these objects or their etale fundamental groups. But this program contains several other important ideas. In particular, motivated by surface topology and moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces, Grothendieck calls there for a recasting of topology, in order to make it fit to the objects of semialgebraic and semianalytic geometry, and in particular to the study of the Mumford-Deligne compactifications of moduli spaces. A new conception of manifold, of submanifold and of maps between them is outlined. We review these ideas in the present chapter, because of their relation to the theory of moduli and Te-ichm{ü}ller spaces. We also mention briefly the relations between Grothendieck's ideas and earlier theories developed by Whitney, Lojasiewicz and Hironaka and especially Thom, and with the more recent theory of o-minimal structures. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.
In his 1944 paper Veränderliche Riemannsche Flächen , Teichmüller defined a structure of complex manifold on the set of isomorphism classes of marked closed Riemann surfaces of genus g. The complex manifold he obtained is the space called today Teichmüller space. In the same paper, Teichmüller introduced the so-called universal Teichmüller curve -- a space over Teichmüller space where the fiber above each point is a Riemann surface representing that point. In fact, Teichmüller proved the existence of the Teichmüller curve as a space of Riemann surfaces parametrized by an analytic space, with an existence and uniqueness theorem establishing this analytic structure. This result was later reformulated and proved by Grothendieck in a series of ten lectures he gave at Cartan's seminar in 1960-1961. In his approach , Grothendieck replaced Teichmüller's explicit parameters by a general construction of fiber bundles whose base is an arbitrary analytic space. This work on Teichmüller space led him to recast the bases of analytic geometry using the language of categories and functors. In Grothendieck's words, the Teichmüller curve becomes a space representing a functor from the category of analytic spaces into the category of sets. In this survey, we comment on Grothendieck's series of lectures. The survey is primarily addressed to low-dimensional topologists and geometers. In presenting Grothendieck's results, we tried to explain or rephrase in more simple terms some notions that are usually expressed in the language of algebraic geometry. However, it is not possible to short-circuit the language of categories and functors. The survey is also addressed to those algebraic geometers who wish to know how the notion of moduli space evolved in connection with Teichmüller theory. Explaining the origins of mathematical ideas contributes in dispensing justice to their authors and it usually renders the theory that is surveyed more attractive. The final version of this paper will appear as a chapter in Volume VI of the Handbook of Teichmüller theory. This volume is dedicated to the memory of Alexander Grothendieck.
We survey some major contributions to Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{ü}ller space. Our report has a historical character, but the stress is on the chain of mathematical ideas. We start with the introduction of Riemann surfaces, and we end with the discovery of some of the basic structures of Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{ü}ller space. We point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many algebraic geometers and analysts working in the theory. The period we are interested in starts with Riemann, in 1851, and ends in the early 1960s, when Ahlfors and Bers confirmed that Teichm{ü}ller's results were correct.This paper was written for the book "Lipman Bers, a life in Mathematics," edited by Linda Keen , Irwin Kra and Rubi Rodriguez (Amercian Mathematical Society, 2015). It is dedicated to the memory of Lipman Bers who was above all a complex analyst and spent a large part of his life and energy working on the analytic structure of Teichm{ü}ller space. His work on analysis is nevertheless inseparable from geometry and topology. In this survey, we highlight the relations and the logical dependence between this work and the works of Riemann, Poincar{é}, Klein, Brouwer, Siegel, Teichm{ü}ller, Weil, Grothendieck and others. We explain the motivation behind the ideas. In doing so, we point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many Teichm{ü}ller theorists.
We provide a commentary on Teichm{ü}ller's paper "Extremale quasikonforme Abbildungen und quadratische Differentiale" (Extremal quasiconformal mappings of closed oriented Riemann surfaces), Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Naturw. Kl. 1940, No.22, 1-197 (1940). The paper is quoted in several works, although it was read by very few people. Some of the results it contains were rediscovered later on and published without any reference to Teichm{ü}ller.In this commentary, we highlight the main results and the main ideas contained in that paper and we describe some of the important developments they gave rise to.The final version of this paper, together with the English translation of Teichm{ü}ller's paper, will apper in Volume V of the \emph{Handbook of Teichm{ü}ller theory} (European Mathematical Society Publishing House, 2015).
This is a mathematical commentary on Teichm{ü}ller's paper ``Bestimmung der extremalen quasikonformen Abbildungen bei geschlossenen orientierten Riemannschen Fl{ä}chen'' (Determination of extremal quasiconformal maps of closed oriented Riemann surfaces). This paper is among the last (and may be the last one) that Teichm{ü}ller wrote on the theory of moduli. It contains the proof of the so-called Teichm{ü}ller existence theorem for a closed surface of genus at least 2. For this proof, the author defines a mapping between a space of equivalence classes of marked Riemann surfaces (the Teichm{ü}ller space) and a space of equivalence classes of certain Fuchsian groups (the so-called Fricke space). After that, he defines a map between the latter and the Euclidean space of dimension 6g-6 Using Brouwer's theorem of invariance of domain, he shows that this map is a homeomorphism. This involves in particular a careful definition of the topologies of Fricke space, the computation of its dimension, and comparison results between hyperbolic distance and quasiconformal dilatation. The use of the invariance of domain theorem is in the spirit of Poincar{é} and Klein's use of the so-called ``continuity principle'' in their attempts to prove the uniformization theorem.