SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Atharva Dange

Publications and source records attributed to Atharva Dange.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Chatbot Conversations in Physics Education: Using Artificial Intelligence to Analyze Student Reasoning through Computational Grounded Theory

This study applies Computational Grounded Theory (CGT) to analyze student misconceptions using interaction data from an AI-powered chatbot deployed in a university-level Modern Physics course. The chatbot - the UTA Study Buddy Bot - engaged students in peer-like problem-solving conversations throughout the semester, generating a rich dataset of over 10 million tokens. To explore patterns in student reasoning and identify recurring conceptual difficulties, we implemented a CGT pipeline that combined natural language processing, unsupervised clustering of sentence-level vector embeddings, human interpretation of emergent themes, and supervised learning to evaluate the generalizability of identified categories. Preliminary results revealed persistent misconceptions in areas such as relativistic momentum and quantum energy levels, along with distinctive trends in how students phrased their questions and expressed uncertainty. These findings underscore the potential of CGT as a scalable, theory-aligned approach for extracting insights from chatbot dialogues and guiding the development of more adaptive, AI-driven educational tools in physics instruction.

physics.ed-ph

aiPlato: A Novel AI Tutoring and Step-wise Feedback System for Physics Homework

This exploratory study examines the classroom deployment of aiPlato, an AI-enabled homework platform, in a large introductory physics course at the University of Texas at Arlington. Designed to support open-ended problem solving, aiPlato provides step-wise feedback and iterative guidance through tools such as "Evaluate My Work" and "AI Tutor Chat", while preserving opportunities for productive struggle. Over four optional extra-credit assignments, the platform captured detailed student interaction data, which were analyzed alongside course performance and end-of-semester survey responses. We examine how students engaged with different feedback tools, whether engagement patterns were associated with performance on the cumulative final exam, and how students perceived the platform's usability and learning value. Students who engaged more frequently with aiPlato tended to achieve higher final exam scores, with a mean difference corresponding to a standardized effect size of approximately 0.81 between high and low engagement groups after controlling for prior academic performance. Usage patterns and survey responses indicate that students primarily relied on iterative, formative feedback rather than solution-revealing assistance. As a quasi-experimental pilot study, these findings do not establish causality and may reflect self-selection effects. Nonetheless, the results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating AI-mediated, step-wise feedback into authentic physics homework and motivate future controlled studies of AI-assisted tutoring systems.

physics.ed-ph