arXiv subjects

Atlanta Chakraborty

Publications and source records attributed to Atlanta Chakraborty.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Surrogate-based Bayesian calibration methods for chaotic systems: a comparison of traditional and non-traditional approaches

Parameter calibration is essential for reducing uncertainty and improving predictive fidelity in physics-based models, yet it is often limited by the high computational cost of model evaluations. Bayesian calibration methods provide a principled framework for combining prior information with data while rigorously quantifying uncertainty. In this work, we compare four emulator-based Bayesian calibration strategies, Calibrate-Emulate-Sample (CES), History Matching (HM), Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED), and a goal-oriented extension of BOED (GBOED). The proposed GBOED formulation explicitly targets information gain with respect to the calibration posterior, aligning design decisions with downstream inference. We assess methods using accuracy and uncertainty quantification metrics, convergence behavior under increasing computational budgets, and practical considerations such as implementation complexity and robustness. For the Lorenz '96 system, CES, HM, and GBOED all yield strong calibration performance, even with limited numbers of model evaluations, while standard BOED generally underperforms in this setting. Differences among the strongest methods are modest, particularly as computational budgets increase. For the two-layer quasi-geostrophic system, all methods produce reasonable posterior estimates, and convergence behavior is more consistent. Overall, our results indicate that multiple emulator-based calibration strategies can perform comparably well when applied appropriately, with method selection often guided more by computational and practical considerations than by accuracy alone. These findings highlight both the limitations of standard BOED for calibration and the promise of goal-oriented and iterative approaches for efficient Bayesian inference in complex dynamical systems.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Summary Statistics of Large-scale Model Outputs for Observation-corrected Outputs

Physics-based models capture broad spatial and temporal dynamics, but often suffer from biases and numerical approximations, while observations capture localized variability but are sparse. Integrating these complementary data modalities is important to improving the accuracy and reliability of model outputs. Meanwhile, physics-based models typically generate large outputs that are challenging to manipulate. In this paper, we propose Sig-PCA, a space-time framework that integrates summary statistics from model outputs with localized observations via a neural network (NN). By leveraging reduced-order representations from physics-based models and integrating them with observational data, our approach corrects model outputs, while allowing to work with dimensionally-reduced quantities hence with smaller NNs. This framework highlights the synergy between observational data and statistical summaries of model outputs, and effectively combines multisource data by preserving essential statistical information. We demonstrate our approach on two datasets (surface temperature and surface wind) with different statistical properties and different ratios of model to observational data. Our method corrects model outputs to align closely with the observational data, specifically enabling to correct probability distributions and space-time correlation structures.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

A Likelihood-Free Approach to Goal-Oriented Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design

Conventional Bayesian optimal experimental design seeks to maximize the expected information gain (EIG) on model parameters. However, the end goal of the experiment often is not to learn the model parameters, but to predict downstream quantities of interest (QoIs) that depend on the learned parameters. And designs that offer high EIG for parameters may not translate to high EIG for QoIs. Goal-oriented optimal experimental design (GO-OED) thus directly targets to maximize the EIG of QoIs. We introduce LF-GO-OED (likelihood-free goal-oriented optimal experimental design), a computational method for conducting GO-OED with nonlinear observation and prediction models. LF-GO-OED is specifically designed to accommodate implicit models, where the likelihood is intractable. In particular, it builds a density ratio estimator from samples generated from approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), thereby sidestepping the need for likelihood evaluations or density estimations. The overall method is validated on benchmark problems with existing methods, and demonstrated on scientific applications of epidemiology and neural science.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2022

Modularized Bayesian analyses and cutting feedback in likelihood-free inference

There has been much recent interest in modifying Bayesian inference for misspecified models so that it is useful for specific purposes. One popular modified Bayesian inference method is "cutting feedback" which can be used when the model consists of a number of coupled modules, with only some of the modules being misspecified. Cutting feedback methods represent the full posterior distribution in terms of conditional and sequential components, and then modify some terms in such a representation based on the modular structure for specification or computation of a modified posterior distribution. The main goal of this is to avoid contamination of inferences for parameters of interest by misspecified modules. Computation for cut posterior distributions is challenging, and here we consider cutting feedback for likelihood-free inference based on Gaussian mixture approximations to the joint distribution of parameters and data summary statistics. We exploit the fact that marginal and conditional distributions of a Gaussian mixture are Gaussian mixtures to give explicit approximations to marginal or conditional posterior distributions so that we can easily approximate cut posterior analyses. The mixture approach allows repeated approximation of posterior distributions for different data based on a single mixture fit, which is important for model checks which aid in the decision of whether to "cut". A semi-modular approach to likelihood-free inference where feedback is partially cut is also developed. The benefits of the method are illustrated in two challenging examples, a collective cell spreading model and a continuous time model for asset returns with jumps.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Weakly informative priors and prior-data conflict checking for likelihood-free inference

Bayesian likelihood-free inference, which is used to perform Bayesian inference when the likelihood is intractable, enjoys an increasing number of important scientific applications. However, many aspects of a Bayesian analysis become more challenging in the likelihood-free setting. One example of this is prior-data conflict checking, where the goal is to assess whether the information in the data and the prior are inconsistent. Conflicts of this kind are important to detect, since they may reveal problems in an investigator's understanding of what are relevant values of the parameters, and can result in sensitivity of Bayesian inferences to the prior. Here we consider methods for prior-data conflict checking which are applicable regardless of whether the likelihood is tractable or not. In constructing our checks, we consider checking statistics based on prior-to-posterior Kullback-Leibler divergences. The checks are implemented using mixture approximations to the posterior distribution and closed-form approximations to Kullback-Leibler divergences for mixtures, which make Monte Carlo approximation of reference distributions for calibration computationally feasible. When prior-data conflicts occur, it is useful to consider weakly informative prior specifications in alternative analyses as part of a sensitivity analysis. As a main application of our methodology, we develop a technique for searching for weakly informative priors in likelihood-free inference, where the notion of a weakly informative prior is formalized using prior-data conflict checks. The methods are demonstrated in three examples.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

A robust and non-parametric model for prediction of dengue incidence

Disease surveillance is essential not only for the prior detection of outbreaks but also for monitoring trends of the disease in the long run. In this paper, we aim to build a tactical model for the surveillance of dengue, in particular. Most existing models for dengue prediction exploit its known relationships between climate and socio-demographic factors with the incidence counts, however they are not flexible enough to capture the steep and sudden rise and fall of the incidence counts. This has been the motivation for the methodology used in our paper. We build a non-parametric, flexible, Gaussian Process (GP) regression model that relies on past dengue incidence counts and climate covariates, and show that the GP model performs accurately, in comparison with the other existing methodologies, thus proving to be a good tactical and robust model for health authorities to plan their course of action.

stat.AP↗