arXiv subjects

Atsushi Takamatsu

Publications and source records attributed to Atsushi Takamatsu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Quasi-Binarized Autoencoders: An Architecture-Independent Information Bottleneck for Medical Image Anomaly Detection

Unsupervised anomaly detection, which learns only from normal images, is a central task in medical image analysis and remains an open problem. Reconstruction-based methods pass an image through an encoder-decoder network trained on normal data and detect anomalies from the residual between the image and its reconstruction. This works only if the information passed from the encoder to the decoder is limited; otherwise the network learns an identity mapping and reconstructs anomalies too. This limit is usually imposed through architectural choices, tuned per dataset, that cannot be stated in bits. We introduce the quasi-binarizing (QB) layer, which squashes each latent element into [0, 1] and adds Laplace noise of scale 1/epsilon. Each element is then epsilon-locally differentially private, and the mutual information between an image and its reconstruction is bounded by a quantity that depends only on epsilon and the number of QB elements, whatever the encoder and decoder. Placing a QB layer on every encoder-decoder path, including all skip connections, we build QBAE, a seven-level attention U-Net with 32,768 QB elements. On the seven datasets of the MedIAnomaly benchmark, QBAE with one architecture and one configuration reaches a mean image-level AUROC of 0.828, the highest among methods that do not adapt to each dataset, and the best reported results on BraTS2021 (AUROC 0.911, pixel-level AP 0.838). The noise is kept at test time, so that every reconstruction satisfies the bound. Without input corruption, the bottleneck alone prevents identity collapse (mean AUROC 0.805 vs. 0.590). Code is available at https://github.com/hanaokalog/MedIAnomalyQB.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Large Language Model-Assisted Cleaning of Report-Derived Labels in a Large-Scale Chest CT Dataset

Purpose: To evaluate whether large language model (LLM)-assisted label cleaning can identify label-report discordance in CT-RATE, a large-scale public chest CT dataset. Materials and Methods: After report-level deduplication, 24,446 unique radiology reports were identified. Twelve reports were excluded from the primary GPT-5.4 analysis because of Microsoft Azure AI Foundry content-safety filtering, leaving 24,434 reports and 439,812 label instances across 18 abnormality categories. GPT-5.4-derived binary labels were generated from report text using structured JSON output and compared with existing CT-RATE labels. Discordant instances were adjudicated by radiologists. In addition, 100 randomly sampled reports were manually annotated to compare CT-RATE labels, individual LLM-derived labels, and multi-LLM majority-vote labels against radiologist-annotated reference labels. Results: Overall agreement between GPT-5.4-derived and CT-RATE labels was 96.4%, with Cohen's kappa of 0.884. Lymphadenopathy showed the lowest agreement and kappa. In discordance review, radiologist adjudication supported GPT-5.4-derived labels in 72 of 97 (74.2%) general discordant instances and 91 of 99 (91.9%) targeted lymphadenopathy discordant instances. Against radiologist-annotated reference labels, multi-LLM majority-vote labels achieved the highest label-macro-averaged F1 score and Cohen's kappa. Conclusion: LLM-assisted label cleaning identified clinically meaningful label-report discordance in CT-RATE and may support scalable quality improvement of public imaging datasets. The cleaned dataset will be made publicly available to support future research.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2026

Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study

Background: Accurate translation of radiology reports is important for multilingual research, clinical communication, and radiology education, but the validity of LLM-based evaluation remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the educational suitability of LLM-generated Japanese translations of chest CT reports and compare radiologist assessments with LLM-as-a-judge evaluations. Methods: We analyzed 150 chest CT reports from the CT-RATE-JPN validation set. For each English report, a human-edited Japanese translation was compared with an LLM-generated translation by DeepSeek-V3.2. A board-certified radiologist and a radiology resident independently performed blinded pairwise evaluations across 4 criteria: terminology accuracy, readability, overall quality, and radiologist-style authenticity. In parallel, 3 LLM judges (DeepSeek-V3.2, Mistral Large 3, and GPT-5) evaluated the same pairs. Agreement was assessed using QWK and percentage agreement. Results: Agreement between radiologists and LLM judges was near zero (QWK=-0.04 to 0.15). Agreement between the 2 radiologists was also poor (QWK=0.01 to 0.06). Radiologist 1 rated terminology as equivalent in 59% of cases and favored the LLM translation for readability (51%) and overall quality (51%). Radiologist 2 rated readability as equivalent in 75% of cases and favored the human-edited translation for overall quality (40% vs 21%). All 3 LLM judges strongly favored the LLM translation across all criteria (70%-99%) and rated it as more radiologist-like in >93% of cases. Conclusions: LLM-generated translations were often judged natural and fluent, but the 2 radiologists differed substantially. LLM-as-a-judge showed strong preference for LLM output and negligible agreement with radiologists. For educational use of translated radiology reports, automated LLM-based evaluation alone is insufficient; expert radiologist review remains important.

cs.AI↗