Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Aurélien Bibaut

Publications and source records attributed to Aurélien Bibaut.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Adaptive inference for functionals of M-estimands

Reinforcement learning and contextual bandit algorithms have become increasingly common in sequential decision-making applications. When these methods are deployed in high-stakes domains, there is growing interest not only in learning effective policies, but also in conducting statistical inference for quantities learned under adaptive data collection. However, classical procedures applied naively in these settings can fail: even when estimators are unbiased, their variance becomes path-dependent and as a result may not be asymptotically normal. A growing literature has emerged to ameliorate this problem, but solutions tend to be problem specific and often rely on correct specification of a working model. In this work, we develop a unified framework for constructing asymptotically valid confidence intervals to cover smooth functionals of nonparametric M-estimands under adaptive sampling. Under Neyman orthogonality, we provide two novel methods for performing inference: (1) a self-normalized statistic based on the realized quadratic variation of the influence function and (2) a statistic using a plug-in estimate of the conditional variance based on reweighted influence function increments. Our results allow for flexible nonparametric estimation of nuisance parameters and remain valid under model misspecification. Our theory is supported by a simulation study for a dynamic pricing application which demonstrates that this method can produce asymptotically valid confidence intervals where standard methods fail.

math.ST↗

Scalable Multi-Task Inverse Reinforcement Learning

By learning transferable rewards, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) enables counterfactual evaluation of agents under modified environments. Such transfer places strict requirements on coverage since target environments affect agents' state occupancy. We propose a multi-task IRL method that pools data across multiple agents with different rewards in the same environment under a low-rank assumption. In addition to alleviating coverage requirements, so each task need not visit every state as long as others do, the method offers scalable evaluation of multiple tasks under new environments as computationally intensive planning scales with rank rather than the number of tasks. We provide finite sample guarantees on reward recovery and on policy learning in new environments. Experiments show our method is robust to limited coverage, recovers rewards on and off of each task's support, transfers to target environments at lower regret than baselines, with its computational advantage over per-task methods widening as tasks grow.

cs.LG↗

Semiparametric Double Reinforcement Learning with Applications to Long-Term Causal Inference

Double reinforcement learning (DRL) provides efficient off-policy inference for policy values in nonparametric Markov decision processes (MDPs), but fully nonparametric estimators can be unstable when intertemporal overlap is weak and occupancy ratios are high-dimensional. This limitation is especially relevant for long-term causal inference from randomized experiments: randomization ensures overlap in treatment assignment, but not over future state trajectories induced by continued intervention use. We develop semiparametric DRL for continuous linear functionals of the infinite-horizon $Q$-function. Rather than impose linear MDP structure on the reward and transition laws, we place working semiparametric restrictions on the $Q$-function itself, the solution of the discounted Bellman equation. When correct, these restrictions can improve efficiency relative to unrestricted DRL while allowing rich, possibly infinite-dimensional models. To avoid relying on correct specification, we define the estimand through weighted Bellman-residual minimization. The resulting projection target remains meaningful under misspecification and recovers the original functional under correct specification. For this class of parameters, we derive efficient influence functions and efficiency bounds, construct model-robust automatically debiased estimators, and develop minimax criteria for estimating the $Q$- and Riesz functions. Under correct specification, optimally weighted versions attain the semiparametric efficiency bound in the restricted model.

stat.ML↗

Efficient Inference for Inverse Reinforcement Learning and Dynamic Discrete Choice Models

In many sequential decision-making problems, researchers observe actions but not the rewards that drive behavior, yet still wish to evaluate and compare counterfactual policies. Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) and dynamic discrete choice (DDC) models address this setting by positing an optimality model that links latent rewards to observed actions. Existing flexible IRL methods allow rich reward representations but typically do not provide valid inference, whereas classical DDC methods support inference only under restrictive parametric structure. We develop a semiparametric framework for debiased inverse reinforcement learning in maximum-entropy IRL and Gumbel-shock DDC models. Our key identification result is that the log-behavior policy can be treated as a pseudo-reward: it point-identifies policy value differences and, under a normalization constraint, the reward itself. This reduces inference on reward-dependent estimands to inference on smooth functionals of the behavior policy and transition kernel. We establish pathwise differentiability, derive efficient influence functions, and construct automatic debiased machine-learning estimators that permit flexible nuisance estimation while attaining $\sqrt{n}$-consistency, asymptotic normality, and semiparametric efficiency. The result is a computationally tractable framework for valid uncertainty quantification in flexible IRL and DDC models.

cs.LG↗

The Value of Personalized Recommendations: Evidence from Netflix

Personalized recommendation systems shape much of user choice online, yet their targeted nature makes separating out the value of recommendation and the underlying goods challenging. We build a discrete choice model that embeds recommendation-induced utility, low-rank heterogeneity, and flexible state dependence and apply the model to viewership data at Netflix. We exploit idiosyncratic variation introduced by the recommendation algorithm to identify and separately value these components as well as to recover model-free diversion ratios that we can use to validate our structural model. We use the model to evaluate counterfactuals that quantify the incremental engagement generated by personalized recommendations. First, we show that replacing the current recommender system with a matrix factorization or popularity-based algorithm would lead to 4% and 12% reduction in engagement, respectively, and decreased consumption diversity. Second, most of the consumption increase from recommendations comes from effective targeting, not mechanical exposure, with the largest gains for mid-popularity goods (as opposed to broadly appealing or very niche goods).

econ.GN↗

Reward Transfer from Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Coupled Minimax Approach

We study the transfer of rewards learned using inverse reinforcement learning from expert demonstrations in one environment to reinforcement learning in a new, different environment. This arises naturally when demonstrations are collected in a controlled environment. We formulate the problem as a joint system of Bellman equations across the source and target environments and develop minimax estimators for the target soft-$q$-function. Whereas a sequential solution approach first estimates the source reward and then plugs it into the target control problem, a coupled approach solves the source and target system of equations jointly. We show that, in contrast to the sequential approach, the coupled approach removes the first-order influence of source Bellman residual error. We characterize the local behavior of each approach, develop finite-sample soft-$q$-function error bounds, and prove regret guarantees for the resulting soft-control policy. An empirical investigation using a sepsis simulator validates the theoretical comparison.

cs.LG↗

Semiparametric Efficient Bilevel Gradient Estimation

Functional bilevel methods estimate a lower-level function and plug it into a hypergradient, but this plug-in gradient can retain first-order bias when the lower-level problem is learned nonparametrically. To remove this bias, we develop a semiparametric debiasing theory for population bilevel gradients based on the efficient influence function. This perspective leads to a cross-fitted orthogonal hypergradient estimator for which we establish asymptotic normality together with uniform control over the outer parameter. Under quadratic losses, the estimator reduces to a simple doubly robust score based on conditional mean nuisances. On synthetic bilevel benchmarks with known ground truth, the method tracks the oracle efficient-gradient benchmark and improves over plug-in functional hypergradients and regularized kernel bilevel baselines.

stat.ML↗

Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Analysis Without Structural Equations: Debiased Inference on Functionals of Inverse Problems with No Solutions

We consider debiased inference on finite-dimensional functionals of infinite-dimensional least-squares solutions to inverse problems as a way to avoid having to assume exact solutions exist. Such assumptions are substantive and not innocuous, and their failure may imperil inference when we impose them on the statistical model. Our approach instead allows us to conduct inference on a quantity that is defined regardless of solutions existing and coincides with the usual estimands when they do. For the case of instrumental variables, this means we can motivate the analysis with structural models but these do not need to hold exactly for the semiparametric inferential procedure to remain valid.

stat.ML↗

Efficient Inference after Directionally Stable Adaptive Experiments

We study inference on scalar-valued pathwise differentiable targets after adaptive data collection, such as a bandit algorithm. We introduce a novel target-specific condition, directional stability, which is strictly weaker than previously imposed target-agnostic stability conditions. Under directional stability, we show that estimators that would have been efficient under i.i.d. data remain asymptotically normal and semiparametrically efficient when computed from adaptively collected trajectories. The canonical gradient has a martingale form, and directional stability guarantees stabilization of its predictable quadratic variation, enabling high-dimensional asymptotic normality. We characterize efficiency using a convolution theorem for the adaptive-data setting, and give a condition under which the one-step estimator attains the efficiency bound. We verify directional stability for LinUCB, yielding the first semiparametric efficiency guarantee for a regular scalar target under LinUCB sampling.

stat.ML↗

Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Inference with Many Weak Instruments

We study inference on linear functionals in the nonparametric instrumental variable (NPIV) problem with a discretely-valued instrument under a many-weak-instruments asymptotic regime, where the number of instrument values grows with the sample size. A key motivating example is estimating long-term causal effects in a new experiment with only short-term outcomes, using past experiments to instrument for the effect of short- on long-term outcomes. Here, the assignment to a past experiment serves as the instrument: we have many past experiments but only a limited number of units in each. Since the structural function is nonparametric but constrained by only finitely many moment restrictions, point identification typically fails. To address this, we consider linear functionals of the minimum-norm solution to the moment restrictions, which is always well-defined. As the number of instrument levels grows, these functionals define an approximating sequence to a target functional, replacing point identification with a weaker asymptotic notion suited to discrete instruments. Extending the Jackknife Instrumental Variable Estimator (JIVE) beyond the classical parametric setting, we propose npJIVE, a nonparametric estimator for solutions to linear inverse problems with many weak instruments. We construct automatic debiased machine learning estimators for linear functionals of both the structural function and its minimum-norm projection, and establish their efficiency in the many-weak-instruments regime. To do so, we develop a general semiparametric efficiency theory for regular estimators under weak identification and many-weak-instrument asymptotics.

stat.ME↗

Simulation-Based Inference for Adaptive Experiments

Multi-arm bandit experimental designs are increasingly being adopted over standard randomized trials due to their potential to improve outcomes for study participants, enable faster identification of the best-performing options, and/or enhance the precision of estimating key parameters. Current approaches for inference after adaptive sampling either rely on asymptotic normality under restricted experiment designs or underpowered martingale concentration inequalities that lead to weak power in practice. To bypass these limitations, we propose a simulation-based approach for conducting hypothesis tests and constructing confidence intervals for arm specific means and their differences. Our simulation-based approach uses positively biased nuisances to generate additional trajectories of the experiment, which we call \textit{simulation with optimism}. Using these simulations, we characterize the distribution potentially non-normal sample mean test statistic to conduct inference. We provide guarantees for (i) asymptotic type I error control, (ii) convergence of our confidence intervals, and (iii) asymptotic strong consistency of our estimator over a wide variety of common bandit designs. Our empirical results show that our approach achieves the desired coverage while reducing confidence interval widths by up to 50%, with drastic improvements for arms not targeted by the design.

stat.ME↗

Evaluating Decision Rules Across Many Weak Experiments

Technology firms conduct randomized controlled experiments ("A/B tests") to learn which actions to take to improve business outcomes. In firms with mature experimentation platforms, experimentation programs can consist of many thousands of tests. To effectively scale experimentation, firms rely on decision rules: standard operating procedures for mapping the results of an experiment to a choice of treatment arm to launch to the general user population. Despite the critical role of decision rules in translating experimentation into business decisions, rigorous guidance on how to evaluate and choose decision rules is scarce. This paper proposes to evaluate decision rules based on their cumulative returns to business north star metrics. Although intuitive and easy to explain to decision-makers, this quantity can be difficult to estimate, especially when experiments have weak signal-to-noise ratios. We develop a cross-validation estimator that is much less biased than the naive plug-in estimator under conditions realistic to digital experimentation. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach via a case study of 123 historical A/B tests at Netflix, where we used it to show that a new decision rule would have increased cumulative returns to the north star metric by an estimated $33\%$, directly leading to the adoption of the new rule.

stat.ME↗

Nonparametric Jackknife Instrumental Variable Estimation and Confounding Robust Surrogate Indices

Jackknife instrumental variable estimation (JIVE) is a classic method to leverage many weak instrumental variables (IVs) to estimate linear structural models, overcoming the bias of standard methods like two-stage least squares. In this paper, we extend the jackknife approach to nonparametric IV (NPIV) models with many weak IVs. Since NPIV characterizes the structural regression as having residuals projected onto the IV being zero, existing approaches minimize an estimate of the average squared projected residuals, but their estimates are biased under many weak IVs. We introduce an IV splitting device inspired by JIVE to remove this bias, and by carefully studying this split-IV empirical process we establish learning rates that depend on generic complexity measures of the nonparametric hypothesis class. We then turn to leveraging this for semiparametric inference on average treatment effects (ATEs) on unobserved long-term outcomes predicted from short-term surrogates, using historical experiments as IVs to learn this nonparametric predictive relationship even in the presence of confounding between short- and long-term observations. Using split-IV estimates of a debiasing nuisance, we develop asymptotically normal estimates for predicted ATEs, enabling inference.

math.ST↗

Learning the Covariance of Treatment Effects Across Many Weak Experiments

When primary objectives are insensitive or delayed, experimenters may instead focus on proxy metrics derived from secondary outcomes. For example, technology companies often infer the long-term impacts of product interventions from their effects on short-term user engagement signals. We consider the meta-analysis of many historical experiments to learn the covariance of treatment effects on these outcomes, which can support the construction of such proxies. Even when experiments are plentiful, if treatment effects are weak, the covariance of estimated treatment effects across experiments can be highly biased. We overcome this with techniques inspired by weak instrumental variable analysis. We show that Limited Information Maximum Likelihood (LIML) learns a parameter equivalent to fitting total least squares to a transformation of the scatterplot of treatment effects, and that Jackknife Instrumental Variables Estimation (JIVE) learns another parameter computable from the average of Jackknifed covariance matrices across experiments. We also present a total covariance estimator for the latter estimand under homoskedasticity, which is equivalent to a $k$-class estimator. We show how these parameters can be used to construct unbiased proxy metrics under various structural models. Lastly, we discuss the real-world application of our methods at Netflix.

stat.ME↗

Inferring the Long-Term Causal Effects of Long-Term Treatments from Short-Term Experiments

We study inference on the long-term causal effect of a continual exposure to a novel intervention, which we term a long-term treatment, based on an experiment involving only short-term observations. Key examples include the long-term health effects of regularly-taken medicine or of environmental hazards and the long-term effects on users of changes to an online platform. This stands in contrast to short-term treatments or "shocks," whose long-term effect can reasonably be mediated by short-term observations, enabling the use of surrogate methods. Long-term treatments by definition have direct effects on long-term outcomes via continual exposure, so surrogacy conditions cannot reasonably hold. We connect the problem with offline reinforcement learning, leveraging doubly-robust estimators to estimate long-term causal effects for long-term treatments and construct confidence intervals.

stat.AP↗

Demistifying Inference after Adaptive Experiments

Adaptive experiments such as multi-arm bandits adapt the treatment-allocation policy and/or the decision to stop the experiment to the data observed so far. This has the potential to improve outcomes for study participants within the experiment, to improve the chance of identifying best treatments after the experiment, and to avoid wasting data. Seen as an experiment (rather than just a continually optimizing system) it is still desirable to draw statistical inferences with frequentist guarantees. The concentration inequalities and union bounds that generally underlie adaptive experimentation algorithms can yield overly conservative inferences, but at the same time the asymptotic normality we would usually appeal to in non-adaptive settings can be imperiled by adaptivity. In this article we aim to explain why, how, and when adaptivity is in fact an issue for inference and, when it is, understand the various ways to fix it: reweighting to stabilize variances and recover asymptotic normality, always-valid inference based on joint normality of an asymptotic limiting sequence, and characterizing and inverting the non-normal distributions induced by adaptivity.

stat.ME↗

Long-Term Causal Inference with Imperfect Surrogates using Many Weak Experiments, Proxies, and Cross-Fold Moments

Inferring causal effects on long-term outcomes using short-term surrogates is crucial to rapid innovation. However, even when treatments are randomized and surrogates fully mediate their effect on outcomes, it's possible that we get the direction of causal effects wrong due to confounding between surrogates and outcomes -- a situation famously known as the surrogate paradox. The availability of many historical experiments offer the opportunity to instrument for the surrogate and bypass this confounding. However, even as the number of experiments grows, two-stage least squares has non-vanishing bias if each experiment has a bounded size, and this bias is exacerbated when most experiments barely move metrics, as occurs in practice. We show how to eliminate this bias using cross-fold procedures, JIVE being one example, and construct valid confidence intervals for the long-term effect in new experiments where long-term outcome has not yet been observed. Our methodology further allows to proxy for effects not perfectly mediated by the surrogates, allowing us to handle both confounding and effect leakage as violations of standard statistical surrogacy conditions.

stat.ME↗

One-step ahead sequential Super Learning from short times series of many slightly dependent data, and anticipating the cost of natural disasters

Suppose that we observe a short time series where each time-t-specific data-structure consists of many slightly dependent data indexed by a and that we want to estimate a feature of the law of the experiment that depends neither on t nor on a. We develop and study an algorithm to learn sequentially which base algorithm in a user-supplied collection best carries out the estimation task in terms of excess risk and oracular inequalities. The analysis, which uses dependency graph to model the amount of conditional independence within each t-specific data-structure and a concentration inequality by Janson [2004], leverages a large ratio of the number of distinct a's to the degree of the dependency graph in the face of a small number of t-specific data-structures. The so-called one-step ahead Super Learner is applied to the motivating example where the challenge is to anticipate the cost of natural disasters in France.

math.ST↗