SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Axel Seifert

Publications and source records attributed to Axel Seifert.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Universal ordinary differential equations and the parameterization of warm-rain processes

The parameterization of warm-rain formation is a long-standing problem in cloud microphysics because the evolution of bulk cloud variables cannot be derived uniquely from the kinetic collection equation (KCE). Universal ordinary differential equations (UODEs)provide a scientific machine learning framework that combines neural networks with ordinary differential equations and can learn dynamical operators directly from time series. Here, the UODE framework is applied to warm-rain formation by training on trajectories generated with a super-droplet model that approximates the KCE. In contrast to most previous machine-learning approaches, only the prognostic state variables are used for training, without requiring autoconversion or accretion rates as targets. The learned closure accurately reproduces the KCE trajectories within the training domain and, although not explicitly constrained to do so, yields autoconversion and accretion rates that closely resemble those diagnosed from the KCE. Analyzing the learned operator provides new insight into the structure of the widely used Seifert and Beheng (2001) warm-rain parameterization. In particular, it suggests that the empirical suppression of accretion primarily compensates for an overestimation of autoconversion at small rain fractions. Motivated by these findings, a refined analytical formulation is proposed that improves agreement with the KCE while retaining the simplicity of the original parameterization. The results demonstrate that UODEs can serve not only as accurate surrogate models but also as a tool for understanding and improving analytical parameterizations of cloud microphysical processes.

physics.ao-ph

On the geometry of aggregate snowflakes

Snowflakes play a crucial role in weather and climate. A significant portion of precipitation that reaches the surface originates as ice, even when it ultimately falls as rain. Contrary to the popular image of symmetric, dendritic crystals, most large snowflakes are irregular aggregates formed through the collision of primary ice crystals, such as hexagonal plates, columns, and dendrites. These aggregates exhibit complex, fractal-like structures, particularly at large sizes. Despite this structural complexity, each aggregate snowflake is unique, with properties that vary significantly around the mean - variability that is typically neglected in weather and climate models. Using a physically based aggregation model, we generate millions of synthetic snowflakes to investigate their geometric properties. The resulting dataset reveals that, for a given monomer number (cluster size) and mass, the maximum dimension follows approximately a lognormal distribution. We present a parameterization of aggregate geometry that captures key statistical properties, including maximum dimension, aspect ratio, cross-sectional area, and their joint correlations. This formulation enables a stochastic representation of aggregate snowflakes in Lagrangian particle models. Incorporating this variability improves the realism of simulated fall velocities, enhances growth rates by aggregation, and broadens Doppler radar spectra in closer agreement with observations.

physics.ao-ph

Comparing the dynamics of idealized squall lines between NWP and LES models

Both Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models and Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) models are used to simulate convective systems, such as squall lines, but with different purposes. NWP models aim for the most accurate weather forecasts, whereas LES models are typically used to advance our understanding of physical processes. Therefore, these types of models differ in their design. With increasing computer power, the domain sizes and resolutions of these models converge, which raises the question if the model results also converge. We investigated an idealized squall line with the NWP model ICON (ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic) and the LES model MicroHH. These models differ in their design, mainly because ICON solves the compressible equations on a triangular grid, while MicroHH solves the anelastic equations on a regular grid. The case setup, including resolution, domain size, boundary conditions, and microphysics scheme, is aligned between the models. The models simulate the same squall-line structure and circulation pattern in simulations with both warm and ice microphysics. However, there are quantitative differences with MicroHH having a more intense squall-line circulation than ICON at all resolutions (1 km, 500 m, and 250 m), mainly because MicroHH has less numerical diffusion. The magnitude of the differences is sensitive to the advection scheme and the resolution and less sensitive to the formulation of turbulent diffusion. The quantitative differences between the models across resolutions highlight the importance of model physics and numerics, whereas the good qualitative agreement gives confidence that insights from LES can be applied in NWP.

physics.ao-ph