arXiv subjects

Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo

Publications and source records attributed to Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation

Multilingual models share capacity across languages, so adding languages can hurt performance on existing ones. Mixture-of-experts models expand this capacity with little additional per-token computation. Given this extra capacity, does adding experts reduce what each additional language costs? To answer this question, we propose a repetition-aware joint scaling law relating number of active parameters, training tokens per language, number of experts, and language coverage. Fitted on 26,300 per-language loss observations from 64 pretrained configurations, our law reduces prediction error on held-out configurations by 28% relative to the strongest evaluated baseline. At matched number of active parameters and training tokens per language, 32 experts reduce the loss penalty of expanding from 12 to 200 languages by 83% compared with a dense model. Our law further shows that broader language coverage favors more experts across a wider range of compute budgets, guiding capacity allocation as multilingual models scale.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Neural Regression with Embeddings for Numerical Attribute Prediction in Knowledge Graphs

In recent years, transductive knowledge graph embedding models have been applied to tasks such as link prediction and query answering. Although knowledge graphs often contain rich numerical attributes, most embedding models neglect them, limiting their ability to represent real-world knowledge graphs with diverse information. In this work, we propose a neural regression model (LitEm) that enables transductive knowledge graph embedding models to predict numerical attributes within knowledge graphs. Experimental results demonstrate that LitEm achieves the best or second-best results on most attributes across FB15K-237, YAGO15K, DB15K, and Mutagenesis. Furthermore, we propose a co-training framework that jointly trains state-of-the-art transductive knowledge graph embedding models with LitEm, which improves link prediction performance mainly for bilinear models and simultaneously enables them to predict numerical attributes. In addition, the literal-awareness evaluation demonstrates that co-training helps models to encode and exploit attribute information in a "literal-aware'' manner, suggesting that the observed gains are not merely due to additional parameters. We publicly release our implementation at https://github.com/dice-group/dice-embeddings.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Syntactic Simplification of OWL Class Expressions

Class expression learning often produces complex OWL class expressions that are difficult to interpret and reason over. However, by following theoretically grounded simplification principles, this complexity can be reduced. In this paper, we propose Class Expression Simplifier (CES), a novel algorithm for the syntactic simplification of class expressions in Description Logics (DL). CES aims to preserve formal semantics while reducing representational complexity. It systematically applies rewriting rules to eliminate redundancies and identify simpler yet equivalent expressions, thereby producing more compact and human-readable representations without altering logical entailments. We evaluate the effectiveness of CES on class expressions learned from two medium-sized ontologies, demonstrating measurable improvements in reasoning efficiency and reductions in verbosity. This work contributes to the broader goal of making ontology-driven applications more accessible, maintainable, and scalable, with direct implications for knowledge graph construction, semantic search, and Web-scale reasoning. CES is implemented within the open-source Python framework OWLAPY and is publicly available.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

MARS: Multi-hop Adaptive Retrieval and SPARQL Generation for KGQA

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning performance, but their tendency to hallucinate limits their reliability in knowledge-intensive tasks requiring up-to-date and grounded information. Combining knowledge graphs (KGs) with LLMs facilitates the use of explicit symbolic knowledge that can be continuously updated without costly fine-tuning, while benefiting from rapidly advancing LLM reasoning. We propose MARS, a scalable knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) approach that requires no model fine-tuning. Rather than relying on open-ended agentic exploration, MARS performs a structured retrieval procedure that links question entities to the KG and iteratively retrieves relevant next-hop information. At each step, MARS decides whether to continue graph traversal or to generate the final SPARQL query, allowing the model to adapt the retrieval depth to the question while keeping the overall pipeline more predictable than fully agentic approaches. We evaluate MARS on three established KGQA benchmarks across several LLMs and settings, including multilingual evaluation, and provide insights through ablation studies and error analysis. Our approach achieves competitive performance relative to state-of-the-art methods while remaining efficient and scalable. The evaluation results, code and resources are publicly available: https://github.com/dice-group/mars-kgqa.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Knowledge Editing using Logical Rules

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications that require access to up-to-date knowledge. However, retraining LLMs is computationally expensive. Therefore, knowledge editing techniques are crucial for maintaining current information and correcting erroneous assertions within pre-trained models. Current benchmarks for knowledge editing primarily focus on recalling edited facts, often neglecting their logical consequences. To address this limitation, we introduce a new benchmark designed to evaluate how knowledge editing methods handle the logical consequences of a single fact edit. Our benchmark extracts relevant logical rules from a knowledge graph for a given edit. Then, it generates multi-hop questions based on these rules to assess the impact on logical consequences. Our findings indicate that while existing knowledge editing approaches can accurately insert direct assertions into LLMs, they frequently fail to inject entailed knowledge. Specifically, experiments with popular methods like ROME and FT reveal a substantial performance gap, up to 24%, between evaluations on directly edited knowledge and on entailed knowledge. This highlights the critical need for semantics-aware evaluation frameworks in knowledge editing.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Inconsistent Databases and Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks

The connection between subset-maximal repairs for inconsistent databases involving various integrity constraints and acceptable sets of arguments within argumentation frameworks has recently drawn growing interest. In this paper, we contribute to this domain by establishing a new connection when integrity constraints (ICs) include denial constraints and local-as-view tuple-generating dependencies. It turns out that SET-based Argumentation Frameworks (SETAFs), an extension of Dung's argumentation frameworks (AFs) allowing collective attacks, are needed. It is known that subset-maximal repairs under denial constraints correspond to the naive extensions, which also coincide with the preferred and stable extensions in the resulting SETAFs. Our main findings establish that repairs under the considered fragment of tuple-generating dependencies correspond to the preferred extensions. Moreover, for these dependencies, additional preprocessing allows computing a unique extension that is stable and naive. Allowing both types of constraints breaks this relationship, and even the pre-processing does not help as only preferred semantics captures these repairs. Finally, while it is known that functional dependencies do not require set-based attacks, we prove the same regarding inclusion dependencies. Thus, one can translate inconsistent databases under these restricted classes of ICs to plain AFs with attacks only between arguments.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

Rethinking Explanations: Formalizing Contrast in Description Logics

There has been a growing interest in explaining entailments over description logic (DL) knowledge bases. The existing explanation formalisms focus on justifications to explain true axioms, and abductive reasoning to explain missing axioms in a knowledge base. However, these formalisms only point out the reasoning steps behind a (missing) entailment and lack a user-centered approach as they do not consider an inquirer's needs, level of understanding, or prior knowledge. We propose contrastive explanations, aiming at answering "why an axiom P (fact) is true instead of another axiom Q (foil)" over description logic knowledge bases. The motivation arises from the observation that when a user discovers that P has occurred, they are often surprised because they anticipated the occurrence of another similar event Q. Furthermore, individual explanations for "why P" and "why not Q" are unsatisfactory since a user expects to see the difference between P and Q. In this work, we first present formal foundations of contrasting questions and then define contrastive explanations within description logics. To this end, facts include ABox assertions of the form C(x) for a concept C and individual x. Possible foils for such facts are assertions C(y) (contrasting against an individual y), or D(x) (contrasting against a concept D). Additionally, we explore the properties of contrastive explanations in the DL EL and ALC. We also provide an implementation of our definition and an experimental evaluation on KBs of varying sizes.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Learning Chain Of Thoughts Prompts for Predicting Entities, Relations, and even Literals on Knowledge Graphs

Knowledge graph embedding (KGE) models perform well on link prediction but struggle with unseen entities, relations, and especially literals, limiting their use in dynamic, heterogeneous graphs. In contrast, pretrained large language models (LLMs) generalize effectively through prompting. We reformulate link prediction as a prompt learning problem and introduce RALP, which learns string-based chain-of-thought (CoT) prompts as scoring functions for triples. Using Bayesian Optimization through MIPRO algorithm, RALP identifies effective prompts from fewer than 30 training examples without gradient access. At inference, RALP predicts missing entities, relations or whole triples and assigns confidence scores based on the learned prompt. We evaluate on transductive, numerical, and OWL instance retrieval benchmarks. RALP improves state-of-the-art KGE models by over 5% MRR across datasets and enhances generalization via high-quality inferred triples. On OWL reasoning tasks with complex class expressions (e.g., $\exists hasChild.Female$, $\geq 5 \; hasChild.Female$), it achieves over 88% Jaccard similarity. These results highlight prompt-based LLM reasoning as a flexible alternative to embedding-based methods. We release our implementation, training, and evaluation pipeline as open source: https://github.com/dice-group/RALP .

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Semantics-Aware Caching for Concept Learning

Concept learning is a form of supervised machine learning that operates on knowledge bases in description logics. State-of-the-art concept learners often rely on an iterative search through a countably infinite concept space. In each iteration, they retrieve instances of candidate solutions to select the best concept for the next iteration. While simple learning problems might require a few dozen instance retrieval calls to find a fitting solution, complex learning problems might necessitate thousands of calls. We alleviate the resulting runtime challenge by presenting a semantics-aware caching approach. Our cache is essentially a subsumption-aware map that links concepts to a set of instances via crisp set operations. Our experiments on 5 datasets with 4 symbolic reasoners, a neuro-symbolic reasoner, and 5 popular pagination policies demonstrate that our cache can reduce the runtime of concept retrieval and concept learning by an order of magnitude while being effective for both symbolic and neuro-symbolic reasoners.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2025

Can You Tell the Difference? Contrastive Explanations for ABox Entailments

We introduce the notion of contrastive ABox explanations to answer questions of the type "Why is a an instance of C, but b is not?". While there are various approaches for explaining positive entailments (why is C(a) entailed by the knowledge base) as well as missing entailments (why is C(b) not entailed) in isolation, contrastive explanations consider both at the same time, which allows them to focus on the relevant commonalities and differences between a and b. We develop an appropriate notion of contrastive explanations for the special case of ABox reasoning with description logic ontologies, and analyze the computational complexity for different variants under different optimality criteria, considering lightweight as well as more expressive description logics. We implemented a first method for computing one variant of contrastive explanations, and evaluated it on generated problems for realistic knowledge bases.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

OWLAPY: A Pythonic Framework for OWL Ontology Engineering

In this paper, we introduce OWLAPY, a comprehensive Python framework for OWL ontology engineering. OWLAPY streamlines the creation, modification, and serialization of OWL 2 ontologies. It uniquely integrates native Python-based reasoners with support for external Java reasoners, offering flexibility for users. OWLAPY facilitates multiple implementations of core ontology components and provides robust conversion capabilities between OWL class expressions and formats such as Description Logics, Manchester Syntax, and SPARQL. It also allows users to define custom workflows to leverage large language models (LLMs) in ontology generation from natural language text. OWLAPY serves as a well-tested software framework for users seeking a flexible Python library for advanced ontology engineering, including those transitioning from Java-based environments. The project is publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/dice-group/owlapy and on the Python Package Index (PyPI) at https://pypi.org/project/owlapy/ , with over 50,000 downloads at the time of writing.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Parameter Averaging in Link Prediction

Ensemble methods are widely employed to improve generalization in machine learning. This has also prompted the adoption of ensemble learning for the knowledge graph embedding (KGE) models in performing link prediction. Typical approaches to this end train multiple models as part of the ensemble, and the diverse predictions are then averaged. However, this approach has some significant drawbacks. For instance, the computational overhead of training multiple models increases latency and memory overhead. In contrast, model merging approaches offer a promising alternative that does not require training multiple models. In this work, we introduce model merging, specifically weighted averaging, in KGE models. Herein, a running average of model parameters from a training epoch onward is maintained and used for predictions. To address this, we additionally propose an approach that selectively updates the running average of the ensemble model parameters only when the generalization performance improves on a validation dataset. We evaluate these two different weighted averaging approaches on link prediction tasks, comparing the state-of-the-art benchmark ensemble approach. Additionally, we evaluate the weighted averaging approach considering literal-augmented KGE models and multi-hop query answering tasks as well. The results demonstrate that the proposed weighted averaging approach consistently improves performance across diverse evaluation settings.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Explainable Benchmarking through the Lense of Concept Learning

Evaluating competing systems in a comparable way, i.e., benchmarking them, is an undeniable pillar of the scientific method. However, system performance is often summarized via a small number of metrics. The analysis of the evaluation details and the derivation of insights for further development or use remains a tedious manual task with often biased results. Thus, this paper argues for a new type of benchmarking, which is dubbed explainable benchmarking. The aim of explainable benchmarking approaches is to automatically generate explanations for the performance of systems in a benchmark. We provide a first instantiation of this paradigm for knowledge-graph-based question answering systems. We compute explanations by using a novel concept learning approach developed for large knowledge graphs called PruneCEL. Our evaluation shows that PruneCEL outperforms state-of-the-art concept learners on the task of explainable benchmarking by up to 0.55 points F1 measure. A task-driven user study with 41 participants shows that in 80\% of the cases, the majority of participants can accurately predict the behavior of a system based on our explanations. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/dice-group/PruneCEL/tree/K-cap2025

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Neural Reasoning for Robust Instance Retrieval in $\mathcal{SHOIQ}$

Concept learning exploits background knowledge in the form of description logic axioms to learn explainable classification models from knowledge bases. Despite recent breakthroughs in neuro-symbolic concept learning, most approaches still cannot be deployed on real-world knowledge bases. This is due to their use of description logic reasoners, which are not robust against inconsistencies nor erroneous data. We address this challenge by presenting a novel neural reasoner dubbed EBR. Our reasoner relies on embeddings to approximate the results of a symbolic reasoner. We show that EBR solely requires retrieving instances for atomic concepts and existential restrictions to retrieve or approximate the set of instances of any concept in the description logic $\mathcal{SHOIQ}$. In our experiments, we compare EBR with state-of-the-art reasoners. Our results suggest that EBR is robust against missing and erroneous data in contrast to existing reasoners.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Contextual Augmentation for Entity Linking using Large Language Models

Entity Linking involves detecting and linking entity mentions in natural language texts to a knowledge graph. Traditional methods use a two-step process with separate models for entity recognition and disambiguation, which can be computationally intensive and less effective. We propose a fine-tuned model that jointly integrates entity recognition and disambiguation in a unified framework. Furthermore, our approach leverages large language models to enrich the context of entity mentions, yielding better performance in entity disambiguation. We evaluated our approach on benchmark datasets and compared with several baselines. The evaluation results show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on out-of-domain datasets.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Ontolearn-A Framework for Large-scale OWL Class Expression Learning in Python

In this paper, we present Ontolearn-a framework for learning OWL class expressions over large knowledge graphs. Ontolearn contains efficient implementations of recent stateof-the-art symbolic and neuro-symbolic class expression learners including EvoLearner and DRILL. A learned OWL class expression can be used to classify instances in the knowledge graph. Furthermore, Ontolearn integrates a verbalization module based on an LLM to translate complex OWL class expressions into natural language sentences. By mapping OWL class expressions into respective SPARQL queries, Ontolearn can be easily used to operate over a remote triplestore. The source code of Ontolearn is available at https://github.com/dice-group/Ontolearn.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Investigating Co-Constructive Behavior of Large Language Models in Explanation Dialogues

The ability to generate explanations that are understood by explainees is the quintessence of explainable artificial intelligence. Since understanding depends on the explainee's background and needs, recent research focused on co-constructive explanation dialogues, where an explainer continuously monitors the explainee's understanding and adapts their explanations dynamically. We investigate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to engage as explainers in co-constructive explanation dialogues. In particular, we present a user study in which explainees interact with an LLM in two settings, one of which involves the LLM being instructed to explain a topic co-constructively. We evaluate the explainees' understanding before and after the dialogue, as well as their perception of the LLMs' co-constructive behavior. Our results suggest that LLMs show some co-constructive behaviors, such as asking verification questions, that foster the explainees' engagement and can improve understanding of a topic. However, their ability to effectively monitor the current understanding and scaffold the explanations accordingly remains limited.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines

Recent advances in AI -- including generative approaches -- have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals. The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment, that is, to make AI systems act according to our preferences. A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise. In cognitive science, human generalisation commonly involves abstraction and concept learning. In contrast, AI generalisation encompasses out-of-domain generalisation in machine learning, rule-based reasoning in symbolic AI, and abstraction in neurosymbolic AI. In this perspective paper, we combine insights from AI and cognitive science to identify key commonalities and differences across three dimensions: notions of, methods for, and evaluation of generalisation. We map the different conceptualisations of generalisation in AI and cognitive science along these three dimensions and consider their role for alignment in human-AI teaming. This results in interdisciplinary challenges across AI and cognitive science that must be tackled to provide a foundation for effective and cognitively supported alignment in human-AI teaming scenarios.

cs.AI↗