Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Aydin Javadov

Publications and source records attributed to Aydin Javadov.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

I Don't Miss You, but I Do: Self-Explanation Faithfulness of Modality Missingness in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in settings where some input modalities may be unavailable, yet we know little about whether they can faithfully explain how such missing information affects their own predictions. We introduce an interventional protocol for evaluating self-explanations of modality dynamics: models state what each modality alone would support, whether restoring a missing modality would change their answer, and whether the available evidence is sufficient; we then execute the corresponding intervention and compare these claims with realized behavior. We evaluate ten VLMs spanning open-weight and proprietary models across four tasks covering mixed, redundant, and unique modality regimes. We find a systematic tendency to overstate the sufficiency of available evidence. Models substantially underestimate the effect of restoring missing modalities: executed change exceeds predicted change in 78 of 80 model-task-condition settings, with task-level median executed change rates reaching 70.1\% while median predicted rates remain at most 9.6\%. Insufficiency claims have low recall, leaving many cases in which behavior changes despite a stated claim of sufficiency. Retrospective self-explanations show the same tendency, over-crediting single-input sufficiency in mixed regimes and interchangeability in redundant ones. Together, these results show that VLMs systematically mischaracterize how their predictions depend on available and missing evidence, motivating executable interventions as a behavioral test of multimodal self-explanations.

cs.LG↗

NeuReasoner: Theory-grounded Mapping of Reasoning Elicitation Boundaries

A growing body of work suggests that the reasoning capabilities of large language models are largely latent in their base form, with post-training primarily amplifying rather than introducing them. However, this evidence comes mainly from mathematical and coding benchmarks, leaving the boundary conditions of that claim largely unexplored, namely which cognitive tasks can be recovered through elicitation and where that recovery fails. To investigate this, we introduce NeuReasoner, a theory-grounded elicitation instrument. At each step, an orchestrator pairs a Neuro Lens, inspired by functional specificity, with a Cognitive Lens, drawn from the Erotetic Theory of Reasoning, and integrates their outputs through internal modularization of a single model, without external tools. We evaluate NeuReasoner on CogBench, a suite of behavioral tasks from cognitive psychology, alongside standard mathematical and coding benchmarks, measuring both its improvement over vanilla inference and its ability to match a model's post-trained thinking mode. At sufficient scale, NeuReasoner matches or exceeds thinking-mode baselines on arithmetic reasoning, code generation, Bayesian reasoning, and reward learning; these gains persist against self-consistency and iterative-refinement baselines matched to NeuReasoner's per-decision call budget. Using NeuReasoner allows us to find clear boundaries: risk-taking and decision making under uncertainty remains hard to recover through elicitation alone, and model scale interacts with elicitation in both directions: widening its advantage on some cognitive signatures while erasing it on others. Overall, through NeuReasoner as a modular, interpretable, theory-grounded elicitation instrument, we empirically map where reasoning elicitation succeeds and fails, beyond the mathematical and coding benchmarks where prior claims have rested.

cs.LG↗

When Does Routing Become Interpretable? Causal Probes on Block Attention Residuals

Block Attention Residuals (Block AttnRes) by replace fixed additive residuals with a learned softmax over earlier depth-source representations, surfacing cross-layer routing as an inspectable tensor in the forward pass. This is a tempting interpretability target: information flow normally inferred indirectly is now directly observable. We ask whether such exposure suffices for mechanistic interpretation. We probe two same-scale ($0.6$B) Block AttnRes checkpoints under identical routing-ablation interventions: a vanilla Qwen3 inference-wrapped through a deterministic recency-bias schedule that the codebase admits as a routing-equivalent loading path, and a Block AttnRes Qwen3 trained from scratch with routing as part of optimisation. The wrapped baseline's routing weights are content-independent and reproduce the schedule's analytic prediction. The trained AttnRes checkpoint instead exhibits three localised routing motifs: an embedding-source pathway through early-layer MLP, a current-state pathway through early-layer attention and MLP, and an older-history pathway through late-layer attention. Beyond this stratification, we find a sharp dissociation between average routing mass and causal importance: in both sublayers, the largest mass slice is not the largest causal contribution, and one source family carries appreciable mass with no detectable causal role under intervention. Architectural exposure of routing is therefore necessary but not sufficient for mechanistic interpretation: structured depth routing emerges only when routing has been part of training, and even then, descriptive routing summaries should be treated as candidate hypotheses to be tested by causal interventions, not as evidence of mechanism in their own right.

cs.LG↗

Compose and Fuse: Revisiting the Foundational Bottlenecks in Multimodal Reasoning

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) promise enhanced reasoning by integrating diverse inputs such as text, vision, and audio. Yet cross-modal reasoning remains underexplored, with conflicting reports on whether added modalities help or harm performance. These inconsistencies stem from a lack of controlled evaluation frameworks and analysis of models' internals to isolate when and why modality interactions support or undermine reasoning. We address this gap through a logic-grounded evaluation framework that categorizes multimodal reasoning into six interaction patterns, varying how facts are distributed across modalities and logically combined. Empirically, additional modalities enhance reasoning only when they provide independent and sufficient reasoning paths, while redundant or chained entailment support often hurts performance. Moreover, reasoning degrades in three systematic ways: weaker modalities drag down overall performance, conflicts bias preference toward certain modalities, and joint signals from different modalities fail to be integrated effectively. Therefore, we identify two core failures: task-composition bottleneck, where recognition and reasoning cannot be jointly executed in one pass, and fusion bottleneck, where early integration introduces bias. For further investigation, we find that attention patterns fail to encode fact usefulness, but a simple two-step prompting (recognize then reason) restores performance, confirming the task-composition bottleneck. Moreover, modality identity remains recoverable in early layers, and softening attention in early fusion improves reasoning, highlighting biased fusion as another failure mode. Overall, our findings show that integration, not perception, is the main barrier to multimodal reasoning, suggesting composition-aware training and early fusion control as promising directions.

cs.CL↗

Pre-Clinical Latency Characterization of VRxBioRelax: A Real-Time EMG Biofeedback System for Muscle Relaxation in Virtual Reality

Chronic tension in the upper trapezius (UT), often caused by poor ergonomics, prolonged posture, or psychological stress, contributes to musculoskeletal discomfort, headaches, and impaired interoceptive awareness. Although surface electromyography (sEMG) biofeedback can promote UT relaxation, traditional systems using conventional displays often fail to sustain engagement. Virtual reality (VR) offers a more immersive alternative, provided that latency remains below perceptual thresholds. We introduce VRxBioRelax, a closed-loop VR biofeedback system that streams sEMG data from Delsys Trigno Avanti sensors via MQTT to a Unity scene. Muscle activation drives a dynamic dawn-to-dusk landscape synchronized with a progressive muscle relaxation protocol. To validate system responsiveness, 87,716 EMG samples from the NinaPro DB2 dataset were replayed at $\sim$75 Hz. Timestamps at four key stages-acquisition, Root Mean Square (RMS) processing, network receipt, and rendering-revealed mean latencies of 0.50 ms (processing), 5.62 ms (network), and 19.22 ms (rendering), yielding an average end-to-end delay of 25.34 ms. Notably, 99.3% of frames arrived within 50 ms. One-sided t-tests confirmed mean latency was significantly lower than both the 30 ms VR comfort limit ($t_{87\,715}=-25.2$, $p=5.9{\times}10^{-140}$) and the 50 ms clinical benchmark ($t_{87\,715}=-133.3$, $p<10^{-300}$). These findings support VRxBioRelax for use in remote interoceptive training, stress reduction, and telepresence-enabled rehabilitation.

cs.HC↗

RAxSS: Retrieval-Augmented Sparse Sampling for Explainable Variable-Length Medical Time Series Classification

Medical time series analysis is challenging due to data sparsity, noise, and highly variable recording lengths. Prior work has shown that stochastic sparse sampling effectively handles variable-length signals, while retrieval-augmented approaches improve explainability and robustness to noise and weak temporal correlations. In this study, we generalize the stochastic sparse sampling framework for retrieval-informed classification. Specifically, we weight window predictions by within-channel similarity and aggregate them in probability space, yielding convex series-level scores and an explicit evidence trail for explainability. Our method achieves competitive iEEG classification performance and provides practitioners with greater transparency and explainability. We evaluate our method in iEEG recordings collected in four medical centers, demonstrating its potential for reliable and explainable clinical variable-length time series classification.

cs.LG↗