Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

B. Ricci

Publications and source records attributed to B. Ricci.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Stellar evolution and large extra dimensions

We discuss in detail the information on large extra dimensions which can be derived in the framework of stellar evolution theory and observation. The main effect of large extra dimensions arises from the production of the Kaluza-Klein (KK) excitations of the graviton. The KK-graviton and matter interactions are of gravitational strength, so the KK states never become thermalized and always freely escape. In this paper we first pay attention to the sun. Production of KK gravitons is incompatible with helioseismic constraints unless the 4+n dimensional Planck mass M_s exceeds 300 Gev/c^2. Next we show that stellar structures in their advanced phase of H burning evolution put much more severe constraints, M_s > 3-4 TeV/c^2, improving on current laboratory lower limits.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismology, solar models and solar neutrinos

We review recent advances concerning helioseismology, solar models and solar neutrinos. Particularly we shall address the following points: i) helioseismic tests of recent SSMs; ii)the accuracy of the helioseismic determination of the sound speed near the solar center; iii)predictions of neutrino fluxes based on helioseismology, (almost) independent of SSMs; iv)helioseismic tests of exotic solar models.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismology and Beryllium neutrino

We derive a lower limit on the Beryllium neutrino flux on earth, $Φ(Be)_{min} = 1\cdot 10^9 cm^{-2} s^{-1}$, in the absence of oscillations, by using helioseismic data, the B-neutrino flux measured by Superkamiokande and the hydrogen abundance at the solar center predicted by Standard Solar Model (SSM) calculations. We emphasize that this abundance is the only result of SSMs needed for getting $Φ(Be)_{min}$. We also derive lower bounds for the Gallium signal, $G_{min}=(91 \pm 3) $ SNU, and for the Chlorine signal, $C_{min}=(3.24\pm 0.14)$ SNU, which are about $3σ$ above their corresponding experimental values, $G_{exp}= (72\pm 6)$ SNU and $C_{exp}= (2.56\pm 0.22) $ SNU.

astro-ph↗

Bounds on hep neutrinos

The excess of highest energy solar-neutrino events recently observed by Superkamiokande can be in principle explained by anomalously high $hep$-neutrino flux $Φ_ν(hep)$. Without using SSM calculations, from the solar luminosity constraint we derive that $Φ_ν(hep)/S_{13}$ cannot exceed the SSM estimate by more than a factor three. If one makes the additional hypothesis that $hep$ neutrino production occurs where the $^3$He concentration is at equilibrium, helioseismology gives an upper bound which is (less then) two times the SSM prediction. We argue that the anomalous $hep$-neutrino flux of order of that observed by Superkamiokande cannot be explained by astrophysics, but rather by a large production cross-section.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismology and the solar age

The problem of measuring the solar age by means of helioseismology hasbeen recently revisited by Guenther & Demarque (1997) and by Weiss & Schlattl (1998). Different best values for $t_{\rm seis}$ and different assessment of the uncertainty resulted from these two works. We show that depending on the way seismic data are used, one may obtain the value $t_{\rm seis}\approx 4.6$ Gy, close to the age of the oldest meteorites, $t_{\rm met}=4.57$ Gy, like in the first paper, or above 5 Gy like in the second paper. The discrepancy in the seismic estimates of the solar age may be eliminated by assuming higher than the standard metal abundance and/or an upward revision of the opacities in the solar radiative interior.We argue that the most accurate and robust seismic measure of the solar age are the small frequency separations, $D_{\ell,n}=ν_{l,n}-ν_{\ell+1,n-1}$, for spherical harmonic degrees $\ell=0,2$ and radial orders $n\gg\ell$.The seismic age inferred by minimization of the sum of squared differences between the model and the solar small separations is $t_{\rm seis}=4.66\pm0.11$, a number consistent with meteoritic data.Our analysis supports earlier suggestions of using small frequency separations as stellar age indicators.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismic tests of diffusion theory

We present a quantitative estimate of the accuracy of the calculated diffusion coefficients, by comparing predictions of solar models with observational data provided by helioseismology. By taking into account the major uncertainties in building solar models we conclude that helioseismology confirms the diffusion efficiency adopted in SSM calculations, to the 10% level.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismology can test the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution

Nuclear reactions in stars occur between nuclei in the high-energy tail of the energy distribution and are sensitive to possible deviations from the standard equilibrium thermal-energy distribution. We are able to derive strong constraints on such deviations by using the detailed helioseismic information of the solar structure. If a small deviation is parameterized with a factor exp{-delta*(E/kT)^2}, we find that delta should lie between -0.005 and +0.002. However, even values of delta as small as 0.003 would still give important effects on the neutrino fluxes.

astro-ph↗

Solar neutrinos: where we are and what is next?

We summarize the results of solar neutrino experiments and update a solar model independent analysis of solar neutrino data. We discuss the implications of helioseismology on solar models and predicted solar neutrino fluxes. Finally , we discuss the potential of new experiments for detecting specific signatures of the proposed solutions to the solar neutrino puzzle.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismology, solar models and neutrino fluxes

We present our results concerning a systematical analysis of helioseismic implications on solar structure and neutrino production. We find Y$_{ph}=0.238-0.259$, $R_b/R_\odot=0.708-0.714$ and $ρ_b=(0.185-0.199)$ gr/cm$^3$. In the interval $0.2<R/R_\odot<0.65$, the quantity $U=P/ρ$ is determined with and accuracy of $\pm 5$\permille~or better. At the solar center still one has remarkable accuracy, $ΔU/U <4%$. We compare the predictions of recent solar models (standard and non-standard) with the helioseismic results. By constructing helioseismically constrained solar models, the central solar temperature is found to be $T=1.58 \times 10^7$K with a conservatively estimated accuracy of 1.4%, so that the major unceratainty on neutrino fluxes is due to nuclear cross section and not to solar inputs.

astro-ph↗

A Mixed Solar Core, Solar Neutrinos and Helioseismology

We consider a wide class of solar models with mixed core. Most of these models can be excluded as the predicted sound speed profile is in sharp disagreement with helioseismic constraints. All the remaining models predict $^7$Be and/or $^7$B neutrino fluxes at least as large as those of SSMs. In conclusion, helioseismology shows that a mixed solar core cannot account for the neutrino deficit implied by the current solar neutrino experiments.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismology and p+p $\to$ d + e$^+$ + $ν_e$ in the sun

By using a phenomenological field theory of nucleon-nucleon interactions, Oberhummer et al. found a cross section of p+p $\to$ d + e$^+$ + $ν_e$ about 2.9 times that given by the potential approach and adopted in Standard Solar Model calculations. We show that a solar model with $S=2.9 S_{SSM}$ is inconsistent with helioseismic data, the difference between model predictions and helioseismic determinations being typically a factor ten larger than estimated uncertainties. We also show that, according to helioseismology, $\Sppzero$ cannot differ from $S_{SSM}$ by more than 15%.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismic constraints to the central solar temperature and neutrino fluxes

The central solar temperature T and its uncertainties are calculated in helioseismologically-constrained solar models. From the best fit to the convective radius, density at the convective radius and seismically determined helium abundance the central temperature is found to be T=1.58x10^7 K, in excellent agreement with Standard Solar Models. Conservatively, we estimate that the accuracy of this determination is Delta T/T=1.4 %, better than that in SSM. Neutrino fluxes are calculated. The lower limit to the boron neutrino flux, obtained with maximum reduction factors from all sources of uncertainties, is 2 sigma higher than the flux measured recently by SuperKamiokande.

astro-ph↗

How long does it take for heat to flow through the sun?

This question, which often comes in when discussing solar neutrinos, is not clearly analysed in any textbook, to our knowledge. In this note we give a simple estimate of the flow time, also reminding its (ir)relevance to the solar neutrino problem.

astro-ph↗

Helioseismology and standard solar models

We present a systematical analysis of uncertainties in the helioseismological determination of quantities characterizing the solar structure. We discuss the effect of errors on the measured frequencies, the residual solar model dependence and the uncertainties of the inversion method. We find Y_{ph}=0.238-0.259, $R_b/R_\odot=0.708-0.714$ and $ρ_b=(0.185-0.199)$ gr/cm^3 (the index b refers to the bottom of the convective envelope). In the interval $0.2<R/R_\odot<0.65$, the quantity U=P/ρis determined with and accuracy of $\pm 5$\permille or better. The predictions of a few recent solar model calculations are compared with helioseismological results.

astro-ph↗

The $^{51}$Cr neutrino source and Borexino: a desirable marriage

Exposure to a $^{51}$Cr neutrino source as that used in Gallex will provide an excellent overall performance test of Borexino, which should collect about 1400 source induced events, with an initial rate of about 35 counts per day. This will be particularly important if MSW-small-angle turns out to be the solution of the solar neutrino problem. In addition, if an independent, accurate calibration is available, one will have an interesting experiment on neutrino properties: as an example, a neutrino magnetic moment of the order $5\cdot10^{-11}μ_B$could be detected/excluded at the 90\% C.L.

hep-ph↗

Solar neutrinos: beyond standard solar models

After a short survey of the physics of solar neutrinos, giving an overview of hydrogen burning reactions, predictions of standard solar models and results of solar neutrino experiments, we discuss the solar-model-independent indications in favour of non-standard neutrino properties. The experimental results look to be in contradiction with each other, even disregarding some experiment: unless electron neutrinos disappear in their trip from the sun to the earth, the fluxes of intermediate energy neutrinos (those from 7Be electron capture and from the CNO cycle) result to be unphysically negative, or anyway extremely reduced with respect to standard solar model predictions. Next we review extensively non-standard solar models built as attempts to solve the solar neutrino puzzle. The dependence of the central solar temperature on chemical composition, opacity, age and on the values of the astrophysical S-factors for hydrogen-burning reactions is carefully investigated. Also, possible modifications of the branching among the various pp-chains in view of nuclear physics uncertainties are examined. Assuming standard neutrinos, all solar models examined fail in reconciling theory with experiments, even when the physical and chemical inputs are radically changed with respect to present knowledge and even if some of the experimental results are discarded.

astro-ph↗

Updating Standard Solar Models

We present an updated version of our standard solar model (SSM) where helium and heavy elements diffusion is included and the improved OPAL equation of state (Rogers 1994, Rogers Swenson \& Iglesias 1996) is used. In such a way the EOS is consistent with the adopted opacity tables, from the same Livermore group, an occurrence which should further enhance the reliability of the model. The results for the physical characteristics and the neutrino production of our SSM are discussed and compared with previous works on the matter.

astro-ph↗

Solar opacity, neutrino signals and helioseismology

In connection with the recent suggestion by Tsytovich et al. that opacity in the solar core could be overestimated, we consider the following questions: i) What would a 10\% opacity reduction imply for the solar neutrino puzzle? ii) Is there any hope of solving the solar neutrino puzzle by changing opacity? iii) Is a 10\% opacity reduction testable with helioseismological data?

astro-ph↗