arXiv subjects

Bair N. Tuchinov

Publications and source records attributed to Bair N. Tuchinov.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Component-Adaptive and Lesion-Level Supervision for Improved Small Structure Segmentation in Brain MRI

Small lesions in brain MRI are hard to segment because they occupy a tiny fraction of the volume and are dominated by background and larger lesions during voxel-wise optimization, so a model can reach a high Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) while missing many of them. We propose CATMIL, a training objective that adds two auxiliary terms to the standard nnU-Net Dice and cross-entropy loss without changing the architecture. The Component-Adaptive Tversky (CAT) term weights lesion voxels by the inverse size of their connected component, so each lesion contributes nearly equally regardless of volume. The lesion-level Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) term treats each lesion as a bag of voxels and penalizes lesions with no detected voxel. For multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation on MSLesSeg, CATMIL achieves the highest small-lesion recall (0.873 vs. 0.796 for Dice+CE; 95% CI of the difference +0.030 to +0.157, higher in all six test patients) and about 48% fewer missed lesions, with comparable DSC and HD95. The gain holds for lesions of at least 3 mm in diameter, the clinical reading size (recall 0.944 vs. 0.870). Standard losses produce no probability response to most small lesions they miss, so no threshold can recover them. The cost is more small false-positive components; a simple component-size filter removes most of them while keeping the sensitivity gain, and at matched lesion-wise precision CATMIL detects more small lesions with higher lesion-wise F1. An ablation attributes the detection gain to the MIL term. On a second dataset, 3D-MR-MS, CATMIL with the same loss weights again improves small-lesion recall, at a larger false-positive cost and slightly lower DSC. Code: https://github.com/luumsk/SmallLesionMRI

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Dataset-Specific Encoding of Image Content Underlies Cross-Dataset Failure in Brain MRI Foundation Models

Frozen features of brain MRI foundation models lose accuracy on new datasets, a failure usually blamed on the features encoding where each scan came from. We show that the failure lies elsewhere. Across 17 public datasets and eight frozen representations, every representation recognizes the MRI sequence within each dataset, yet most fail on an unseen one. The cause is neither dataset encoding nor a shift of each dataset: the content itself is encoded along different directions in each dataset. This explains which datasets fail, for the sequence and for sex, and why removing the dataset signal with INLP, LEACE, CORAL or adversarial training never improves sequence transfer. Only the broadly pretrained 3DINO and SAM-Med3D encode the sequence consistently enough to transfer; the brain-specific BrainIAC and BrainFM do no better than an untrained network. Code is available at https://github.com/BrainFM/brainfm-profiler/tree/main/representation_utility.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

A Foundation Model for Brain MRI with Dynamic Modality Integration

We present a foundation model for brain MRI that can work with different combinations of imaging sequences. The model uses one encoder with learnable modality embeddings, conditional layer normalization, and a masked autoencoding objective that accounts for missing modalities. A variance-covariance regularizer is applied to stabilize feature learning and improve representation diversity. This design removes the need for separate models for each modality and allows the network to adapt when some sequences are missing or unseen. It is trained on about 60,000 multi-center MRIs using self-supervised reconstruction and modality imputation to learn flexible representations. A learnable modality embedding guides feature extraction so the encoder can adjust to different inputs. We describe our planned evaluation on brain tumor and multiple sclerosis segmentation, as well as lesion classification, under various modality settings. Preliminary results show that the method works feasibly, and further experiments are planned to study its performance in more detail. All code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/BrainFM/brainfm

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

A Structured Review and Quantitative Profiling of Public Brain MRI Datasets for Foundation Model Development

The development of foundation models for brain MRI depends critically on the scale, diversity, and consistency of available data, yet systematic assessments of these factors remain scarce. In this study, we analyze 54 publicly accessible brain MRI datasets encompassing over 538,031 to provide a structured, multi-level overview tailored to foundation model development. At the dataset level, we characterize modality composition, disease coverage, and dataset scale, revealing strong imbalances between large healthy cohorts and smaller clinical populations. At the image level, we quantify voxel spacing, orientation, and intensity distributions across 15 representative datasets, demonstrating substantial heterogeneity that can influence representation learning. We then perform a quantitative evaluation of preprocessing variability, examining how intensity normalization, bias field correction, skull stripping, spatial registration, and interpolation alter voxel statistics and geometry. While these steps improve within-dataset consistency, residual differences persist between datasets. Finally, feature-space case study using a 3D DenseNet121 shows measurable residual covariate shift after standardized preprocessing, confirming that harmonization alone cannot eliminate inter-dataset bias. Together, these analyses provide a unified characterization of variability in public brain MRI resources and emphasize the need for preprocessing-aware and domain-adaptive strategies in the design of generalizable brain MRI foundation models.

cs.CV↗