arXiv subjects

Baoluo Sun

Publications and source records attributed to Baoluo Sun.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Proximal Path-Specific Inference

Causal mediation analysis has been extended to estimate path-specific effects with multiple intermediate variables, isolating treatment effects through a mediator of interest while excluding pathways through its ancestors. Such analyses address bias from recanting witnesses, i.e., treatment-induced mediator-outcome confounders. However, existing methods typically rely on stringent assumptions precluding general unmeasured confounding, which are often violated in practice. In this paper, we relax these restrictions by leveraging observed covariates as proxy variables to accommodate unmeasured confounding among the treatment, recanting witness, mediator, and outcome. Using proximal confounding bridge functions, we develop four nonparametric identification strategies for the path-specific effect. We further derive the efficient influence function and propose a quadruply robust, locally efficient estimator. To handle high-dimensional nuisance parameters, we propose a proximal debiased machine learning approach. We theoretically guarantee that our estimator achieves $\sqrt{n}$-consistency and asymptotic normality even when machine learning estimators for nuisance functions converge at slower rates. Our approaches are validated via semiparametric and nonparametric simulations and an application to the CDC WONDER Natality study, estimating the path-specific effect of prenatal care on preterm birth through preeclampsia, independent of maternal smoking during pregnancy.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Quasi Instrumental Variable Methods for Stable Hidden Confounding and Binary Outcome

Instrumental variable (IV) methods are central to causal inference from observational data, particularly when a randomized experiment is not feasible. However, of the three conventional core IV identification conditions, only one, IV relevance, is empirically verifiable; often one or both of the other conditions, exclusion restriction and IV independence from unmeasured confounders, are unmet in real-world applications. These challenges are compounded when the outcome is binary, a setting for which robust IV methods remain underdeveloped. A fundamental contribution of this paper is the development of a general identification strategy justified under a structural equilibrium dynamic generative model of so-called stable confounding and a quasi instrumental variable (QIV), i.e. a variable that is only assumed to be predictive of the outcome. Such a model implies (a) stability of confounding on the multiplicative scale, and (b) stability of the additive average treatment effect among the treated (ATT), across levels of that QIV. The former is all that is necessary to ensure a valid test of the causal null hypothesis; together those two conditions establish nonparametric identification and estimation of the conditional and marginal ATT. To address the statistical challenges posed by the need for boundedness in binary outcomes, we introduce a generalized odds product re-parametrization of the observed data distribution, and we develop both a principled maximum likelihood estimator and a triply robust semiparametric locally efficient estimator, which we evaluate through simulations and an empirical application to the UK Biobank.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Multi-Task Learning for High-Dimensional Regression with Many Weak Instruments

Many weak instrumental variables (IVs) are routinely used in the health and social sciences to improve identification and inference of the treatment effect of interest, along with a broad collection of data on potential confounding factors in the hope that the IV assumptions hold within each data stratum. We propose a new debiased continuous-updating generalized method of moments estimator with multi-task learning of the IV propensity scores to simultaneously address the biases from a diverging number of weak IVs as well as first-step regularized estimation of nuisance regression functions in high-dimensional potential confounding factors. We develop a new multi-task learning theory for generalized linear models under a general sub-Gaussian design to establish valid inference in the many weak IVs asymptotic regime under appropriate sparsity conditions. We evaluate the proposed method via extensive Monte Carlo studies and an empirical application to investigate the returns to education.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Constructive Instrumental Variable Identification and Inference with Many Weak Interaction Moments

Instrumental variable methods are widely used for causal inference, but identification becomes especially challenging when instruments are weak and potentially invalid. These challenges are particularly pronounced in Mendelian randomization, where genetic variants serve as instruments and violations of exclusion restriction or independence assumptions are common. We propose MAGIC, a constructive and assumption-lean framework that achieves identification even when all candidate instruments may be invalid. The method exploits pairwise and higher-order interactions among mutually independent instruments to construct moment conditions orthogonal to both unmeasured confounding and direct effects under a linear structural model. The resulting estimation problem involves many potentially weak interaction moments with unknown nuisance parameters. We develop a semiparametric generalized method of moments estimator and introduce a global Neyman orthogonality condition to ensure robustness of both the moment function and its derivative to nuisance estimation under many weak moment asymptotics. We establish consistency and asymptotic normality when the number of moments diverges with sample size and characterize the semiparametric efficiency bound under fixed dimension. Simulations and an application to UK Biobank data illustrate the method.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Proximal Inference for Indirect and Intervening Effects in Population Interventions

Unmeasured confounding, unethical exposure, and ill-defined interventions pose significant challenges to evaluating policy-relevant mediation estimands in medicine and public health. In observational studies involving harmful exposures, the population intervention indirect effect (PIIE) is often more salient than the natural indirect effect, as the latter relies on hypothetical interventions that may be ethically or practically unfeasible. While the PIIE can be identified via the generalized front-door criterion under unmeasured exposure-outcome confounding, existing estimation methods typically assume the absence of unmeasured confounding for the mediator. Furthermore, when the exposure corresponds to ill-defined interventions, the standard PIIE criterion fails; however, the generalized front-door formula may still identify the causal effect of an intervening variable designed to capture the indirect effect. This paper develops a unified identification and estimation framework for the PIIE and the causal effect of an intervening variable in settings with pervasive unmeasured confounding affecting exposure-mediator, exposure-outcome, and mediator-outcome relationships. Specifically, we leverage observed covariates as proxy variables to construct three distinct identification strategies within a proximal causal inference framework. We characterize the semiparametric efficiency bound for the target estimands and develop multiply robust, locally efficient estimators that remain consistent under partial model misspecification. The finite-sample performance of our estimators is demonstrated through simulations. Finally, we apply our methodology to study the indirect effect of alcohol consumption on depression risk as mediated by depersonalization symptoms.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

On Doubly Robust Estimation with Nonignorable Missing Data Using Instrumental Variables

Suppose we are interested in the mean of an outcome that is subject to nonignorable nonresponse. This paper develops new semiparametric estimation methods with instrumental variables which affect nonresponse, but not the outcome. The proposed estimators remain consistent and asymptotically normal even under partial model misspecifications for two variation independent nuisance components. We evaluate the performance of the proposed estimators via a simulation study, and apply them in adjusting for missing data induced by HIV testing refusal in the evaluation of HIV seroprevalence in Mochudi, Botswana, using interviewer experience as an instrumental variable.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Testing High-Dimensional Mediation Effect with Arbitrary Exposure-Mediator Coefficients

In response to the unique challenge created by high-dimensional mediators in mediation analysis, this paper presents a novel procedure for testing the nullity of the mediation effect in the presence of high-dimensional mediators. The procedure incorporates two distinct features. Firstly, the test remains valid under all cases of the composite null hypothesis, including the challenging scenario where both exposure-mediator and mediator-outcome coefficients are zero. Secondly, it does not impose structural assumptions on the exposure-mediator coefficients, thereby allowing for an arbitrarily strong exposure-mediator relationship. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed test is the first of its kind to provably possess these two features in high-dimensional mediation analysis. The validity and consistency of the proposed test are established, and its numerical performance is showcased through simulation studies. The application of the proposed test is demonstrated by examining the mediation effect of DNA methylation between smoking status and lung cancer development.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators under Unmeasured Mediator-Outcome Confounding

It is often of interest in the health and social sciences to investigate the joint mediation effects of multiple post-exposure mediating variables. Identification of such joint mediation effects generally require no unmeasured confounding of the outcome with respect to the whole set of mediators. As the number of mediators under consideration grows, this key assumption is likely to be violated as it is often infeasible to intervene on any of the mediators. In this paper, we develop a simple two-step method of moments estimation procedure to assess mediation with multiple mediators simultaneously in the presence of potential unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding. Our identification result leverages heterogeneity of the exposure effect on each mediator in the population, which is plausible under a variety of empirical settings. The proposed estimators are illustrated through both simulations and an application to evaluate the mediating effects of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in the association between self-efficacy and fatigue among health care workers during the COVID-19 outbreak.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

A stableness of resistance model for nonresponse adjustment with callback data

Nonresponse arises frequently in surveys and follow-ups are routinely made to increase the response rate. In order to monitor the follow-up process, callback data have been used in social sciences and survey studies for decades. In modern surveys, the availability of callback data is increasing because the response rate is decreasing and follow-ups are essential to collect maximum information. Although callback data are helpful to reduce the bias in surveys, such data have not been widely used in statistical analysis until recently. We propose a stableness of resistance assumption for nonresponse adjustment with callback data. We establish the identification and the semiparametric efficiency theory under this assumption, and propose a suite of semiparametric estimation methods including doubly robust estimators, which generalize existing parametric approaches for callback data analysis. We apply the approach to a Consumer Expenditure Survey dataset. The results suggest an association between nonresponse and high housing expenditures.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Semiparametric Efficient G-estimation with Invalid Instrumental Variables

The instrumental variable method is widely used in the health and social sciences for identification and estimation of causal effects in the presence of potentially unmeasured confounding. In order to improve efficiency, multiple instruments are routinely used, leading to concerns about bias due to possible violation of the instrumental variable assumptions. To address this concern, we introduce a new class of g-estimators that are guaranteed to remain consistent and asymptotically normal for the causal effect of interest provided that a set of at least $\gamma$ out of $K$ candidate instruments are valid, for $\gamma\leq K$ set by the analyst ex ante, without necessarily knowing the identities of the valid and invalid instruments. We provide formal semiparametric efficiency theory supporting our results. Both simulation studies and applications to the UK Biobank data demonstrate the superior empirical performance of our estimators compared to competing methods.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

GENIUS-MAWII: For Robust Mendelian Randomization with Many Weak Invalid Instruments

Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a popular approach to study causal effects by using genetic variants as instrumental variables. We propose a new MR method, GENIUS-MAWII, which simultaneously addresses the two salient phenomena that adversely affect MR analyses: many weak instruments and widespread horizontal pleiotropy. Similar to MR GENIUS (Tchetgen Tchetgen et al., 2021), we achieve identification of the treatment effect by leveraging heteroscedasticity of the exposure. We then derive the class of influence functions of the treatment effect, based on which, we construct a continuous updating estimator and establish its consistency and asymptotic normality under a many weak invalid instruments asymptotic regime by developing novel semiparametric theory. We also provide a measure of weak identification, an overidentification test, and a graphical diagnostic tool. We demonstrate in simulations that GENIUS-MAWII has clear advantages in the presence of directional or correlated horizontal pleiotropy compared to other methods. We apply our method to study the effect of body mass index on systolic blood pressure using UK Biobank.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

On Mendelian Randomization Mixed-Scale Treatment Effect Robust Identification (MR MiSTERI) and Estimation for Causal Inference

Standard Mendelian randomization analysis can produce biased results if the genetic variant defining the instrumental variable (IV) is confounded and/or has a horizontal pleiotropic effect on the outcome of interest not mediated by the treatment. We provide novel identification conditions for the causal effect of a treatment in presence of unmeasured confounding, by leveraging an invalid IV for which both the IV independence and exclusion restriction assumptions may be violated. The proposed Mendelian Randomization Mixed-Scale Treatment Effect Robust Identification (MR MiSTERI) approach relies on (i) an assumption that the treatment effect does not vary with the invalid IV on the additive scale; and (ii) that the selection bias due to confounding does not vary with the invalid IV on the odds ratio scale; and (iii) that the residual variance for the outcome is heteroscedastic and thus varies with the invalid IV. We formally establish that their conjunction can identify a causal effect even with an invalid IV subject to pleiotropy. MiSTERI is shown to be particularly advantageous in presence of pervasive heterogeneity of pleiotropic effects on additive scale, a setting in which two recently proposed robust estimation methods MR GxE and MR GENIUS can be severely biased. In order to incorporate multiple, possibly correlated and weak IVs, a common challenge in MR studies, we develop a MAny Weak Invalid Instruments (MR MaWII MiSTERI) approach for strengthened identification and improved accuracy MaWII MiSTERI is shown to be robust to horizontal pleiotropy, violation of IV independence assumption and weak IV bias. Both simulation studies and real data analysis results demonstrate the robustness of the proposed MR MiSTERI methods.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

High-dimensional Model-assisted Inference for Local Average Treatment Effects with Instrumental Variables

Consider the problem of estimating the local average treatment effect with an instrument variable, where the instrument unconfoundedness holds after adjusting for a set of measured covariates. Several unknown functions of the covariates need to be estimated through regression models, such as instrument propensity score and treatment and outcome regression models. We develop a computationally tractable method in high-dimensional settings where the numbers of regression terms are close to or larger than the sample size. Our method exploits regularized calibrated estimation, which involves Lasso penalties but carefully chosen loss functions for estimating coefficient vectors in these regression models, and then employs a doubly robust estimator for the treatment parameter through augmented inverse probability weighting. We provide rigorous theoretical analysis to show that the resulting Wald confidence intervals are valid for the treatment parameter under suitable sparsity conditions if the instrument propensity score model is correctly specified, but the treatment and outcome regression models may be misspecified. For existing high-dimensional methods, valid confidence intervals are obtained for the treatment parameter if all three models are correctly specified. We evaluate the proposed methods via extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to estimate the returns to education.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Accounting for correlated horizontal pleiotropy in two-sample Mendelian randomization using correlated instrumental variants

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful approach to examine the causal relationships between health risk factors and outcomes from observational studies. Due to the proliferation of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and abundant fully accessible GWASs summary statistics, a variety of two-sample MR methods for summary data have been developed to either detect or account for horizontal pleiotropy, primarily based on the assumption that the effects of variants on exposure (γ) and horizontal pleiotropy (α) are independent. This assumption is too strict and can be easily violated because of the correlated horizontal pleiotropy (CHP). To account for this CHP, we propose a Bayesian approach, MR-Corr2, that uses the orthogonal projection to reparameterize the bivariate normal distribution for γ and α, and a spike-slab prior to mitigate the impact of CHP. We develop an efficient algorithm with paralleled Gibbs sampling. To demonstrate the advantages of MR-Corr2 over existing methods, we conducted comprehensive simulation studies to compare for both type-I error control and point estimates in various scenarios. By applying MR-Corr2 to study the relationships between pairs in two sets of complex traits, we did not identify the contradictory causal relationship between HDL-c and CAD. Moreover, the results provide a new perspective of the causal network among complex traits. The developed R package and code to reproduce all the results are available at https://github.com/QingCheng0218/MR.Corr2.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

Selective Machine Learning of the Average Treatment Effect with an Invalid Instrumental Variable

Instrumental variable methods have been widely used to identify causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. A key identification condition known as the exclusion restriction states that the instrument cannot have a direct effect on the outcome which is not mediated by the exposure in view. In the health and social sciences, such an assumption is often not credible. To address this concern, we consider identification conditions of the population average treatment effect with an invalid instrumental variable which does not satisfy the exclusion restriction, and derive the efficient influence function targeting the identifying functional under a nonparametric observed data model. We propose a novel multiply robust locally efficient estimator of the average treatment effect that is consistent in the union of multiple parametric nuisance models, as well as a multiply debiased machine learning estimator for which the nuisance parameters are estimated using generic machine learning methods, that effectively exploit various forms of linear or nonlinear structured sparsity in the nuisance parameter space. When one cannot be confident that any of these machine learners is consistent at sufficiently fast rates to ensure $\surd{n}$-consistency for the average treatment effect, we introduce a new criteria for selective machine learning which leverages the multiple robustness property in order to ensure small bias. The proposed methods are illustrated through extensive simulations and a data analysis evaluating the causal effect of 401(k) participation on savings.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2016

Identification and Inference for Marginal Average Treatment Effect on the Treated With an Instrumental Variable

In observational studies, treatments are typically not randomized and therefore estimated treatment effects may be subject to confounding bias. The instrumental variable (IV) design plays the role of a quasi-experimental handle since the IV is associated with the treatment and only affects the outcome through the treatment. In this paper, we present a novel framework for identification and inference using an IV for the marginal average treatment effect amongst the treated (ETT) in the presence of unmeasured confounding. For inference, we propose three different semiparametric approaches: (i) inverse probability weighting (IPW), (ii) outcome regression (OR), and (iii) doubly robust (DR) estimation, which is consistent if either (i) or (ii) is consistent, but not necessarily both. A closed-form locally semiparametric efficient estimator is obtained in the simple case of binary IV and outcome and the efficiency bound is derived for the more general case.

stat.ME↗